Even with all those stars they lost viewers.
I was going to watch but then remembered that I had to wash my socks.
Did they count all of the dead viewers who will be voting (D) in November?
You mean droves of people were not rushing to their TVs to watch Chelsea intro Hillary?
==
Chelsea has has similar problems in small rallies for Hillery. Chelsea just does not draw crowds.
The RATS thought they would do the same old playbook on their convention...old, tiring, boring, and ‘stars’ what stars, the ones in their heads???
The RNC had a great convention, with speakers that knew what is going on in the American lives of her people, the RATS were in a ‘far off distant make believe island’...altho you would have to ask Bill about an ‘island’ since he’s been to one many times...
We had a hell of a good time last night on the live thread. Ripped them libtards to shreds....
Check this out. So much for the adoring crowd
http://www.yesimright.com/hillary-caught-using-actors-to-fill-seats-during-her-dnc-speech-shes-done/
The first three nights of the Democratic Convention beat the ratings of the first three nights of the Republican Convention.
If the fourth night had the Dems slip below the GOP numbers, then there are a lot of politicos chewing antacids like candy today.
Consider that a lot of viewers are force-fed the coverage. I dropped my wife off at the Kelsey-Seybold cancer clinic for chemo yesterday, and the Hillary love-fest on CNN was on all the TVs. I’m sure most hospitals and airports were doing likewise.
For once I wanted to see the protesters. But hardly anything was shown. Today RT showed Jake Tapper shouting to cut away as protesters were getting loud.
It’s just kabuki theater anyway. They only need to present enough of a show of support, with media lying to make them look more popular, to make the fraudulent voting numbers plausible.
Why watch a bunch of old crooks who have one foot in grave while saying the same crap they’ve been pushing for 40 years?
Astroturf.
Low energy, low interest.
NPR breathlessly said it was better than the RNC.
This is in line with what we know from the primary results.
In 2008 there were 38,111,341 Democrat votes in the primary.
In 2016 there were 28,269,195. A net decrease of 9,842,146 (-29%)
In 2012 there were 19,214,513 Republican votes in primary.
In 2016 there were 30,261,999. A net increase of 11,047,486 (+57%)
I am amazed people did not turn out to see the transgender woman who used to be a guy. (Not Hillary, the other one.)
This is the Big 3. They are in the tank for St. Hillary. If Republicans beat Dems on the Big 3, the Dems are in trouble.