Posted on 07/26/2016 1:13:41 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
BREAKING: DNC Officials Are Now Taking Away Bernie Sanders Signs From Convention Delegates #DNCLeaks
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeoutfitters.com ...
That is perfect!
How else are they going to get their student loans paid off by the taxpayers?
Heh.
Must see TV.
First they come for your bernie sign.
Next they’ll come for your guns
PHOOEY to the Democrap New World Fascists!!!!
PHOOEY to Crooked Hillary and Corrupt Kaine, and to Goofy/Fakey Elizabeth Warren, too!!!!
I was thinking earlier today about the seizure prospect: if I was there, I would have had a Bernie sign made as a cloth sleeve just large enough to fit over an approved Hitlery sign. Roll it up and slip the contraband sign in my undies and after getting admitted carrying my Hitlery sign, I would whip out my...Bernie sign...and slip it over the other one.
Presto! Go Bernie time!
Nope...Bernie got his free rental campaign jet, any objection now trumped. For months has stated Hillary was unqualified for the presidency...now with his campaign jet agreement in hand ...all is well.
Bernies good bye went way to well last night, it will not continue, I am going to watch the votes tonight, have never done that but this time it may get interesting.
Bernie is still a putz and so his supporters. They will lay down.
Hillary ordered him to be compliant...Hillary PAID him to be compliant
Time for American citizens to do a quick study of the ideas of its "beginnings" so that they can recognize the counterfeit ideas which are being "imprint(ed)" upon it and are breaking down the "social fabric" that sustained freedom and order for over 200 years.
The following is quoted from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":
Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:
"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal life—imperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive strides—broadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove." EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
It's like Sanders has to prove that his is bigger than Trump's. Of course (<^..^>) I mean plane on the runway. Seriously, selling out for that plane makes we wonder if Sanders has serious manhood issues.
No free speech for you.
Did they do that at the RNC? I don’t think they needed to.
looks like an upside down palestinian flag?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.