Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Trump forces think they can get a candidate next week [Not April Fools]
Washington Examiner ^ | July 19, 2016 | Joel Grehrke

Posted on 07/20/2016 10:04:52 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: thinden

But this time there is no name to do it. 17 people vied for the nomination and they were all BEATEN soundly.


61 posted on 07/20/2016 11:12:22 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

It’s becoming pretty obvious much of the #nevertrump crowd is and has been on the Hillary payroll.”

The Trump campaign should put this out as a press release. That would be funny.


62 posted on 07/20/2016 11:15:49 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Edmund/Liawatha 2016. If you are going to lie, lie big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Ginsburg will be 84, 2 months after inauguration.
Anthony Kennedy turns 80, this Saturday.
Stephen Breyer turns 78 in about 4 weeks.

So Scalia’s seat is one that definitely has to be filled.
Chances are very high that at least one of the others will leave during the next term.

If Hillary gets in, Ginsberg WILL definitely retire and I’d suspect Breyer would also. Opening 3 seats for Hillary to fill.

As an incumbent, Hillary becomes even harder to beat.
7 years from now Kennedy is 87, Breyer is 85, almost absolutely guaranteeing that Hillary would appoint 4.
Also, 7 years from now Clarence Thomas will be 75. Health could swing for him by then. (especially with Hillary in office)

The GOPe can stamp their little feet all they like, but the REAL action happens the next term.


63 posted on 07/20/2016 11:17:00 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 60Gunner

OMG you’re right, he looks like Jared the pedo.


64 posted on 07/20/2016 11:17:27 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
"Anti-Trump forces think they can get a candidate next week [Not April Fools]..."

..... Is it Pedro? Will he promise that all of our wildest dreams will come true?

65 posted on 07/20/2016 11:21:44 AM PDT by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

If they do this, I am picking one of them as a target.


66 posted on 07/20/2016 11:33:52 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Hillary: "Weapons of war have no place on our streets."... Laz: "Muslims are weapons of war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bray

Cultists is exactly correct. I kinda enjoy watching them marginalize themselves, easier to manage them in the future.


67 posted on 07/20/2016 11:56:11 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44 (If you ain't the lead dog, the scenery never changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Don't be surprised if that candidate is Ted Cruz...AFTER HE GIVES HIS BIG SPEECH TONIGHT.

He'll extol the virtues of "Real Conservatives"...down-talk Hillary a little...and he'll not endorse Trump.

He might even make it sound a little like a farewell speech...setting up the hammer in the next week or so when he announces his 3rd party run.

And he'll have all the money and zealots he could hope for.

What's not so bad about such a scenario is it will draw more Independents, Occasional Voters and Democrats to Trump when they see what a Real Conservative is.

Lead with Social Issues but actually work at Globalism via Trade, Immigration, Foreign Adventure and the continued bribery of the Corrupt US Congress.

And all the continued lawlessness that brings.

68 posted on 07/20/2016 12:04:41 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

they can have John Kasick


69 posted on 07/20/2016 12:07:21 PM PDT by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Sure, they are.

Its all talk and nothing will come of it.


70 posted on 07/20/2016 12:22:17 PM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

Actually something that is possible is very likely to happen, given enough time.


71 posted on 07/20/2016 2:42:28 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; be-baw; eastforker; Piranha
Good explanation at # 44, Piranha.

Probability is defined as the likelihood of an event occuring, expressed as a decimal number in the range zero to one.

Impossible means P(event) = zero.

Improbable means P(event) < 0.01 (if the chances are 1/100).

Plausible means believable. Plausible deniability implies everyone knows we're lying, but the fictional cover story is marginally reasonable. Plausible implies a low range of probability. P(event) = [0.15 – 0.25] perhaps.

Coin flip means P(event) = 0.5

Likely = probably means P(event) > 0.5

Inevitable = ineluctable means P(event) approaches 1.0 asymptotically over time.

Certain means P(event) = 1.0

72 posted on 07/20/2016 3:23:52 PM PDT by goldbux (When you're odd the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
"We believe that it's not only possible but it is plausible that a candidate will emerge, will get on the ballot, and will fight to give Americans a better option, and so we're not giving up," Better for America chief strategist Joel Searby said Tuesday evening before a like-minded crowd in Cleveland.

Most of those who were talking about a third party effort have already given up and moved on.

Searby and his firm Data Targeting may have some kind of financial interest in keeping this idea afloat.

I doubt Bill Kristol actually has the kind of money to pay for the third party effort, but Searby could be hoping that #NeverTrump will pay off for him and his firm financially, either this year, or in the future, or in terms of greater publicity and visibility.

73 posted on 07/20/2016 3:31:04 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

“Plausible deniability implies everyone knows we’re lying, but the fictional cover story is marginally reasonable. Plausible implies a low range of probability. P(event) = [0.15 – 0.25] perhaps.”

Outstanding post. You understand plausibility and probability.


74 posted on 07/20/2016 3:33:47 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Do you know in which states a 3rd party candidate COULD get on the ballot? Any swing states?

I’m not sure where they think it’d make a difference. The primaries showed that Trump is stronger than anyone imagined in the South, so this attempt would not peel off votes there. The only “red” state that I could foresee possibly being turned would be Utah if they keep listening to Romney and Lee.


75 posted on 07/20/2016 3:35:07 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Thank you. Glad to help.


76 posted on 07/20/2016 4:45:30 PM PDT by goldbux (When you're odd the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson