Posted on 07/10/2016 10:21:14 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
Inciting a war against police is terrorism.
At a Black Lives Matter (BLM) rally in Dallas yesterday, demonstrators protested the recent shootings of two African American men by white police officers in Minnesota and Louisiana. “Enough is enough!” the marchers shouted while they held signs bearing slogans like: “If all lives matter, why are black ones taken so easily?” Then, as we now know, several assasins opened fire on the law-enforcement officers who were on duty at the rally. Four policemen and one transit officer were killed, and six additional police were wounded.
No analysis of this atrocity would be complete without noting the now-indisputable fact that every word uttered by BLM and its mouthpieces is an unadulterated lie. The entire self-identified purpose of this movement—which is to demand “an immediate end to police brutality and [to] the murder of Black people and all oppressed people”—is rendered utterly fictitious by a single statement of fact: Of all suspects who are killed by police in the US each year, 41.7% are white, 20.3% are Hispanic, and 31.7% are black—even as blacks account for 38.5% of all arrests for violent crimes, which are the types of crimes most likely to trigger a confrontation with police that could result in a fatality.
These numbers do not in any way suggest a lack of restraint by police in their dealings with black suspects. They suggest precisely the opposite. And that's the dirty little secret. Evidence of systemic racism in police shootings simply doesn't exist. Anywhere.
The premise underlying BLM's whole mission is a lie.
And, of course, justice for brutal and unnecessary loss of black life was never the real agenda of BLM anyway. This fact is painfully evidenced by the vast and ever-accumulating body count of black murders committed predominately by other blacks — every incident of which is met with silence by BLM’s race agitators. Rather, BLM was always a hate group animated not by a desire to save lives, but to take them. Its message is one of hate; for white people, for black people who did not follow its radical agenda, and for the entire nation.
Last night the BLM joined the ranks of major terrorist organizations.
A suspect in the attack last night had made it clear to a negotiator that, inspired to anger to anger by the BLM movement, he wanted to kill “white people” and especially “white officers.”
That’s what racism looks like. That’s what terrorism looks like.
What happened in Dallas was inevitable. It was not an isolated incident. Just ask the families of Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, murdered by BLM supporter Ismaaiyl Brinsley over a BLM cause.
The assassination of the two NYPD officers bore a striking resemblance to the Dallas attack. Had the media and their Democratic allies backed away from their unthinking support of BLM, Dallas need not have happened. Instead the media continued pushing its drumbeat of lies.
Yet BLM case after BLM case collapsed. The Freddie Gray hoax, which wrecked a city, proved hollow, just as the Michael Brown case had. And yet every Democrat, from Obama on down, did not waver.
Dallas is the defining line. The targeted murder of five police officers is a clear terror attack.
And the cause was the incitement by BLM and its media and political allies against police officers. BLM and its media propagandists have spent years portraying cops as killers out to exterminate the black community. What happened in Dallas was a direct result of that exterminationist rhetoric.
BLM’s message is that the country and its police officers are out to commit “genocide” against “brown bodies,” that the nation is illegitimate and that police officers are racist killers. Instead of being shunned, this rhetoric was rewarded, as when literary darling Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote that police officers “were not human to me.” For his hate speech, Coates received a MacArthur Genius Grant.
Some agreed with Coates. They saw police officers as less than human and killed them.
We cannot forget the origins of the Dallas attack in such rhetoric or BLM protesters chanting, “Pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon.” If we forget, then the next BLM terrorist attack will be our responsibility.
And while we can respect the rights of even hate groups to operate, we cannot tolerate terrorist organizations. It’s time to shut down BLM before the next shooting happens.
The National Law Enforcement Memorial Fund has recorded a very significant spike in police officer deaths. Last June, Chief Brown responded to the shooting attack at DPD headquarters by saying, “Go to a restaurant with us one time. Go eat lunch with us. We’re never going to sit with our back to the door.”
But it’s impossible to stop everyone who wants to kill a police officer. And it’s time we turned our attention to those who are behind the attacks.
The media is still repeating the same lies that we heard in Ferguson or Baltimore about “peaceful protests” suddenly turning violent. But those lies won’t fly anymore. The protests were never peaceful. When they become openly violent, it’s not a radical shift but an implementation of their core message.
BLM is a terrorist movement, and it should be designated as such by the U.S. government. It started out as the KKK. Now it’s evolving into Al Qaeda with an ideological core that promotes the idea of a total war while “lone wolves” do its dirty work. It’s time to hold it — and its supporters — accountable. It’s up to us to see that Dallas never happens again.
It’s also a WH generated poll that gets you to give them your name and e-mail for their data base
“BLM is a terrorist movement, and it should be designated as such by the U.S. government.
Never gonna happen, looking like Lynch Mob at DOJ is supporting the Marxist group behind the scenes. Not sure Trump would have the balls either to do it.
Incorrect. It is a petition started by a private citizen and it is NOT a poll. As if the fed.gov doesn't already have your name and e-mail as a taxpayer? Credit Card user? Motor Vehicle Operator? Passport Holder? - let's not kid ourselves - the last FReeper that lived off the grid was PharmerPhil back in 97 and Noumenon back in 2000
To the instigator himself
Boy, aren't we paying attention
I thought black lives matter already was a terrorist organization.
I signed the petition...
if there is no peace, then there must be no peace
I’m sure the same Justice Department that refused to prosecute Hillary Clinton will be all over that.
Signed
As I understand it and please correct me if I’m wrong ...
Those who support Shariah Law, those who publicly chant for ‘pigs in a blanket’ to be ‘fried like bacon’, and those who openly support Islamo-terrorists — they revoked their citizenship by their own actions.
A citizen is someone loyal to the peace-loving members of the nation. It’s impossible to be both a citizen and an enemy of a nation.
The only question is how do we determine who revoked his or her citizenship. Who decides and how? If it’s real-time public knowledge, we lose the vital element of surprise. If it’s too secretive, it becomes tyrannical.
Citizenship doesn’t work that way.
People renounce their citizenship all the time. I think it is time to redefine citizenship. Why can someone be a citizen and support re Conquista or Islamo-terrorism at the same time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.