Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Even if one were to believe their conversation was limited to "the grandchildren," can anyone envision a scenario where it would be proper for the lead prosecutor in a government corruption investigation to have a private social meeting with the spouse of one of (if not the main) subjects of said investigation?
1 posted on 06/29/2016 12:58:03 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines

It is not possible to fathom


2 posted on 06/29/2016 1:00:01 PM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The spouse is one thing, but Bill’s into this Clinton Foundation stuff up to his eyeballs as well. There’s NO good reason Lynch should have met with him. Something’s up.


3 posted on 06/29/2016 1:00:46 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Notice how the writer is suggesting that it was just a chance, coincidental meeting, since they both happened to be in Phoenix at the same time?


7 posted on 06/29/2016 1:11:30 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I’m going to have to charge her Bill. But Barry said he would pardon her. Trump is going to be president.


8 posted on 06/29/2016 1:29:10 PM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Imagine an episode of Law and Order where a well-connected politician spouse of a high profile defendant in an espionage case privately meets with the district attorney, and it is brushed off to the press as just an exchange of pleasantries. It seems highly improbable that such a scenario wouldn’t be aggressively challenged as legal corruption, but yet here we are.


9 posted on 06/29/2016 1:54:20 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“He spoke to myself...”

Moron.


13 posted on 06/29/2016 2:06:49 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Can you say , “Obstruction Of Justice” and did she bring her knee pads ?


15 posted on 06/29/2016 2:09:40 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Golf and grandchildren? They must think all of us just fell off the melon truck.


17 posted on 06/29/2016 2:24:31 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand (Alka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

How convenient. I doubt if Trump will overlook this.


18 posted on 06/29/2016 2:31:48 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; DarthVader

“Remember even Bonnie and Clyde came to an end! Tommie gun with extreme prejudice style.”

Yes, I do. Tommy G, with bodies bouncing in slow motion with multiple angles, is too nice an end for the expletives looting/destroying the greatest republic in the history of civilization.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H7zO6Ky8RE

Two Kinds of Plunder

I do not think that illegal plunder, such as theft or swindling — which the penal code defines, anticipates, and punishes — can be called socialism. It is not this kind of plunder that systematically threatens the foundations of society. Anyway, the war against this kind of plunder has not waited for the command of these gentlemen. The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. Long before the Revolution of February 1848 — long before the appearance even of socialism itself — France had provided police, judges, gendarmes, prisons, dungeons, and scaffolds for the purpose of fighting illegal plunder. The law itself conducts this war, and it is my wish and opinion that the law should always maintain this attitude toward plunder.

The Law Defends Plunder

But it does not always do this. Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal.

The Law - Frederic Bastiat

The greatest crime couple in the history of the republic ALERT!


20 posted on 06/29/2016 2:34:16 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

wasn’t this meeting a violation of some sort of rule, at least that is what I read on another post..is that true?


24 posted on 06/29/2016 2:52:03 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“I did not have plea bargain negotiations with that woman, Loretta Lynch!”

(Shaking bent finger)


25 posted on 06/29/2016 2:53:05 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (No such thing as micromanagement...It's usually microMISmanagement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If the beast gets elected, they’ll hold her over as AG.

A little quid pro quo.


26 posted on 06/29/2016 2:54:25 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
 photo e33d2f3d-7668-414f-83e3-2f9bdd03ff00_zpsea03jtaf.jpg
27 posted on 06/29/2016 2:54:30 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Aren’t there laws against private meetings between parties involved in a government investigation? or private meetings between our countries head prosecutor and a defendant?
This is a complete mockery of the rule of law. Why isn’t the RNC hitting this hard? Trump shouldn’t have to do everything. This (ignoring rule of law) has permeated all levels of government, not just national.


28 posted on 06/29/2016 3:02:02 PM PDT by blues-train (blues train)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Interesting timing...


29 posted on 06/29/2016 3:18:21 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

And, of course, it had to be aboard Clinton’s plane so that nobody could bug the conversation.

I guess they share chuckles all of the time when they talk about how stupid we are to believe their lies.


32 posted on 06/29/2016 3:45:11 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Keep calm and Pray on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Is she not supposed to talk to Clinton while the Hildabeast is under investigation by the FBI and the DOJ. Sounds like the nations top cop broke the law and she be encouraged to resign immediately. remember Roberto Gonzales he did something and lo and behold the liberals wanted his head on a platter>


37 posted on 06/29/2016 3:50:22 PM PDT by hondact200 (Lincoln Freed the Slaves. Obama Enslaves the Free. Trump 2016 - Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
can anyone envision a scenario where it would be proper for the lead prosecutor in a government corruption investigation to have a private social meeting with the spouse of one of (if not the main) subjects of said investigation?

Under no circumstances is that ethical or proper in any way. Someone prominent needs to call for her resignation...it won't happen, of course, but it could serve to draw attention to this matter and get it into the news.

39 posted on 06/29/2016 3:56:32 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Well, Arkansas Bill has always enjoyed blow jobs from women of color!


40 posted on 06/29/2016 3:59:21 PM PDT by miserare ( "What difference does it make?"~~Benghazi Hil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson