Obama the 'Muslim Fraud'!
Posted on 06/22/2016 7:40:13 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
In commenting on why the Obama administration initially had decided to release redacted portions of the 911 telephone calls made by the radical Islamic terrorist who killed 49 people at an Orlando night club, columnist, author, and former terrorism prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy said it was because the government “is becoming Sharia-adherent.”
Sharia is the Islamic law that many Muslims (and governments) throughout the world follow, and it is based on the teachings in the Quran.
On Monday’s Bretibart News Daily (SiriusXM), host Stephen K. Bannon asked McCarthy, “The attorney general went on NBC yesterday and she said she’s redacting the audio of the assailant in Orlando to take out his call to jihad, his pledge to the Islamic State. Did you buy her reason? Or do you think it shows our government is starting to become Sharia-adherent or Sharia-compliant?
McCarthy, who prosecuted the radical Islamic terrorists responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, said, “It’s clearly that the government is becoming Sharia-adherent. And the left is using the same tactic with respect to law enforcement against radical Islamic extremism as it uses in the area of what they call ‘climate change.’”
“That is, they have an official version of events, which may be part of a counter-universe, but it’s their story and they’re sticking to it,” he said. “And what they’re trying to do is purge any alternative explanation.”
McCarthy continued, “So, the administration has the position that violent extremism, which is what they call it, is disconnected from any credible interpretation of Islam; that Islam is singularly a religion of peace and there is to be no other interpretation of it; and, therefore, anything that shows the direct nexus between Islamic doctrine and jihadist terror is to be suppressed.”
I'll believe it when he gives up pork.
Guess who? 82 #44 Oregon State U Beavers
Re-posted from yesterday’s post...A challenge to us as Americans who love liberty...
Government Self Interest Directly Opposes Individual Self Interest - Whose Side Are You On?
Let’s get it straight.
Government self-interest is opposed to the Constitution and individual freedom.
State and individual self-interest - embodied in the Constitution and state and individual freedom - is opposed to government self-interest.
By its very nature the central government is against the interests of the states and the people. That is why we have a Constitution, to keep this potential monster in its constitutional cage.
Again, let’s get it straight. Political government basically does only one thing well: coerce and kill. Government is VERY GOOD at coercion and killing. A good government, limited by the rule of law, will kill threatening enemies without and coerce wrongdoers within. A bad government, unhinged from the rule of law, is tyranny and will coerce and kill mostly its own citizens in its unquenchable quest for money and power.
Our central government is a government of tyranny because it has shed the limitations of the rule of law of the Constitution which is its ONLY legal source of power. For those reasons, our central government loves its guns but, in its thirst for more and more illegitimate power, wants to take away our guns so we won’t be a threat to their power regardless of constitutional prohibitions upon the central government from doing so.
Guns is a perfect example of the self interest of an unlimited government of tyranny being directly opposed to the self interest of the states and individuals. But guns are only one example of the central government taking unconstitutional and illegitimate power upon itself at the expense of your freedom. Sharia law is another example. Sharia law is absolutely forbidden at the federal and state level in the Constitution by its text and original understanding and intent.
You just have to ask yourself one question: which side are you on?
At some point, one must ask, what price freedom (political freedom simply being the absence of government coercion or laws)?
At some point, the people of each state must ask through their elected representatives, what price freedom? It is up to the states and the people of the states to say to unconstitutional federal acts (”tyranny”), ENOUGH! NO MORE!
The bad news is, so far, the states have shown themselves to be more interested in financial dependency on the feds than in freedom and independence. That MUST change.
God forbid. Shaw Shriek a Law.
WTH is the majority Republican Congress for? Observers?
Let’s just get this straight, people. Follow the money.
We find the same Temple money changers, with different names, working both sides of the aisle, but with the very same agenda, who are directing the likes of Paul Leave-It-to-Beaver Ryan and the brain saint, HILLARY BULLDOG CLINTON, all rolling around together on the same Temple steps with the globalist/open borders/one world government battalion of cash hogs.
We must follow the money.
Bump to your pdf for later reading.
“At some point, the people of each state must ask through their elected representatives, what price freedom? It is up to the states and the people of the states to say to unconstitutional federal acts (”tyranny”), ENOUGH! NO MORE!”
It would be nice to have a coordinated and forceful message to the TRAITORS in the federal gubbermint and statist media. The silence is deafening.
I’ve read elsewhere that American banks and financial institutions are being forced to become sharia compliant, too.
Totally backwards—Muslims should be required to comply with our laws in order to be allowed to be here, or interact financially with us internationally.
BTW, Islam does NOT mean “peace.”
It means “SUBMISSION.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.