Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's Huge Libyan Disaster (great article)
national interest dot org ^ | Charles R. Kubic

Posted on 06/16/2016 1:51:35 PM PDT by doug from upland

Prior to the February 17, 2011, “Day of Rage,” Libya had a national budget surplus of 8.7 percent of GDP in 2010, with oil production at 1.8 million barrels per day, on track to reach its goal of 3 million barrels per day. Currently, oil production has decreased by over 80 percent. Following the revolution, the Libyan economy contracted by an estimated 41.8 percent, with a national deficit of 17.1 percent GDP in 2011.

Before the revolution, Libya was a secure, prospering, secular Islamic country and a critical ally providing intelligence on terrorist activity post–September 11, 2001. Qaddafi was no longer a threat to the United States. Yet Secretary of State Hillary Clinton strongly advocated and succeeded in convincing the administration to support the Libyan rebels with a no-fly zone, intended to prevent a possible humanitarian disaster that turned quickly into all-out war.

Within weeks of the revolution there were two valid cease-fire opportunities, one presented to the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and a second opportunity presented to U.S. Africa Command for direct military commander negotiations to effect Gaddafi’s abdication, in which I was personally involved. Both opportunities were rejected and shut down by Secretary Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalinterest.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; disaster; hillary; hugh; isis; liar; libya; nato; pantsuit

1 posted on 06/16/2016 1:51:35 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hillary herself is a huge disaster.


2 posted on 06/16/2016 2:02:10 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

George Soros and Hillary Clinton came up with the “Responsibility To Protect” idea that they used as cover to attack Libya.

Our attack on Libya was made so that Hillary and Soros could profit.

Where did Qadaffi’s fortune go?

Where did Libya’s gold go?


3 posted on 06/16/2016 2:06:30 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hillary is stupid and a pathological liar. These are facts. Lately when talking she seems exhausted and desperate, definitely low energy even when she is shouting.


4 posted on 06/16/2016 2:18:04 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Doesn’t matter. None of it matters. The Media and the Republican Party are savagely, and relentlessly, attacking Trump 24/7.

The Ruling Class and their Media propaganda outlets mean to put that witch in office and you peons have no say in the matter.


5 posted on 06/16/2016 2:29:39 PM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

In her own words (and cackle): He came, we saw, he died.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y


6 posted on 06/16/2016 2:35:20 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
(Clinton Meets in Paris With Libyan Rebel Leader)

(Libya – Ali al-Salabi and the Re-Emerging Muslim Brotherhood)

(Libya Epitomizes Clinton's Not-So-Smart Power)


7 posted on 06/16/2016 2:39:39 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Great article. Very damning.

Why the polls have Hillary up big is beyond me. Do people just not know what she’s done? Or do they not believe it? Or do they not care?


8 posted on 06/16/2016 2:42:56 PM PDT by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

I think a lot of it has to do with the way the media is demonizing Trump. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such an onslaught against a political candidate. They’ll have you believe this is the reincarnation of Adolph Hitler, replete with genocide, etc. Really.

(See the NYTimes editorial page, for example, accompanied by inflammatory headlines and editorialized articles in the main news sections. They actually said genocide. The NY Daily News is no different.)


9 posted on 06/16/2016 3:09:22 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

Quote:

” Do people just not know what she’s done? Or do they not believe it? Or do they not care?”

All three. As Howard Stern said, this is a nation of sheep. Very stupid sheep.


10 posted on 06/16/2016 3:25:48 PM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

polls mean nothing. They are just an excuse to Bray more propaganda. I pray that the important poll taken in November stays true and isn’t just a bunch of made up numbers.


11 posted on 06/16/2016 3:29:52 PM PDT by themidnightskulker (And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Clinton and Obama created the greatest refugee/migrant crisis since WWII. It’s that simple. Why does no on say this????


12 posted on 06/16/2016 4:51:33 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angels27; RAldrich

There are some threads about the polling. The short of it is that the polls are over-representing Democrats. Historically people almost always vote for the candidate of the party they voted for in the last election. In the last election, Obama beat Romney by about 4% nationwide. So a fair poll would try to reach likely voters and balance them so that only about 4% more Obama voters would included than Romney voters. However, the polls so far seem to be running 10%-12% sampling people who voted for Obama in the last election. By this measure they are over-representing people likely to vote for Hillary. If you balance them to align with the 4% built-in advantage, Trump is either much closer or even ahead. It gets even more interesting when you break it down state by state because of the electoral college. In states that were closer than 4% or in states that went for Romney, Trump may have a large edge including places like PA and NJ.

Of course Hillary supporters in the media will want to push polls that they think benefit them. Look for polls that show their internals and show likely voter representation balanced. Plus there is another factor which is that if you did not vote in the last election you are not a likely voter so you won’t get counted in these polls. The open question is whether Trump will inspire people to get out and vote when they hadn’t been inspired before. The rhetoric is getting hot and it might be an historic election in many ways. It is a very crucial election for the future of the country.


13 posted on 06/16/2016 5:51:01 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson