Posted on 06/15/2016 9:44:06 AM PDT by SandRat
PHOENIX — A young U.S. citizen is suing the federal government after she said she was taken in handcuffs by border offices to a Nogales hospital for a body cavity search — which found nothing — and then billed for the procedure.
Ashley Cervantes says in her lawsuit that she had crossed into Mexico on foot on a Saturday morning in October 2014 to have breakfast at a restaurant where she often eats. On returning, she presented border officials with her birth certificate and state identification card.
Attorney Brian Marchetti said they accused the woman, 18 at the time, of possessing drugs. When she denied that was true, they took her into a detention room where, during the next several hours, she was handcuffed to a chair, had several dogs sniff her, and eventually taken into a separate room where she was patted down and asked to squat so female investigators could visually inspect her.
All that, said Marchetti, occurred without her consent or a warrant. In fact, he said, a request to call her mother was denied.
It was what happened next that Marchetti charges clearly violated his client's rights.
He said an agent of Customs and Border Protection signed a "Treatment Authorization Request'' to have her taken to a medical facility as an alleged "potential internal carrier of foreign substance.'' That form, he said, requested an X-ray.
Instead, Marchetti said Cervantes was taken in handcuffs to Holy Cross Hospital where the doctor probed her anus and vagina.
"Ashley had never before been to a gynecologist and, for the remainder of her life, will always remember that her first pelvic and rectal exams were under the most inhumane circumstances imaginable to a U.S. citizen at a hospital on U.S. soil,'' Marchetti charges in his lawsuit.
No drugs ever were found, Marchetti said, and his client was released after about seven hours.
The attorney said the problem goes beyond the decisions by federal agents. He charged that the hospital has no protections in place to ensure that searches sought by law enforcement comply with constitutional requirements.
A spokesman for Customs and Border Protection declined to comment.
But the agency's policy says that body cavity searches must be approved by a supervisor "and after obtaining consent or a search warrant.'' It also says that consent to X-rays "must be freely and voluntarily given'' or a court order is required.
Gary Hopkins, spokesman for Tenet Healthcare, the majority owner of the hospital, said he cannot comment because the issues in the lawsuit predate his company's involvement with Holy Cross.
Marchetti did not dispute that standards for searches of someone crossing into the country, even a U.S. citizen, may be different than someone stopped by police elsewhere. But he told Capitol Media Services none of that excuses what happened to Cervantes.
"Wherever the line is, it's crossed here where you have an American citizen who, by the way, the most trouble she's ever been in is an hour of detention her freshman year of high school,'' he said.
"Whether or not the border exception applies here, we would certainly submit the search needs to be reasonable,'' Marchetti said. And even if "reasonable minds'' could disagree on whether an X-ray might have been appropriate, that was not the course taken by Customs and Border Protection.
And Marchetti said if the invasion of his client's body was not enough, that was not the end. The hospital had one more thing.
"They even billed her parents for the 'treatment' for $575,'' he said.
The case will be heard in front of a federal judge in Tucson.
I thought you now needed a passport to cross back and forth from Mexico?
....or a passport card.
Yes, I think that is correct. But they probably make exceptions for people who are escaping bad conditions in their home country. Or 0bama quietly gave an executive order for border agents to ignore that law.
*wow*
(texokie shakes head)
I guess she will not be going into Mexico fro breakfast anymore. Outrageous.
or anything else.
I know in the 70’s we did not need a passport to cross over and come back. But we did have to show identification, such as a driver’s license.
Hopefully a new millionaire. Gross abuse of power.
If I want to go to Mexico for breakfast all I’ve got to do is go over to Diamond Hill in Fort Worth.
If I want to go to Mexico for breakfast all I’ve got to do is go over to Diamond Hill in Fort Worth.
I lived near the Canadian border in the 80’s, and that’s all you needed. It all changed under Bush about a decade ago.
Past court rulings have found that until you clear customs and immigration, you aren’t technically in the U.S. Hence the Constitution does not apply to you and they authorities can do basically whatever they darned well want to you.
Not sure what the basis for her appeal may be.
Breakfast in Mexico here is anywhere right down the street.
School kids do it all the time. The US school bus picks them up at the border and takes them to a US school in the mornings and returns them to the border in the afternoon. Free US education. Free US laptop. Free US breakfasts and lunches. Free to everyone except the US taxpayer.
Why do I not sense any outrage here? Ho, hum, just another day of being “raped” by the government. I would be freaking insane if this had happened to me or one of mine. They’d be doing body cavity searches on somebody, alright, looking for as many .40 slugs as I was able to squeeze off!
We needed some kind of special ID...maybe it was yellow. This was in the 70’s.
Horny border guards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.