Posted on 06/14/2016 8:54:03 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Biden: No Man Has a Right to Touch a Woman Who Walks Stark Naked to the Capitol David Rutz
BY: June 14, 2016 11:01 am
Vice President Joe Biden deployed some colorful imagery at the United State of Women Summit on Tuesday, saying even a woman who walked stark naked to the U.S. Capitol had no right to receive unwanted touches from a man.
Biden said the Violence Against Women Act, which he drafted as a U.S. senator, articulated the fundamental right of women to live their lives free of abuse.
I remember when we did the act, when we were debating it, I said if a woman in this audience got up, stripped down, stark naked, and walked over to the United States Capitol, she has a right to be arrested for indecent exposure, but no man, even in that circumstance, has a right to touch her, he said. No man has a right to touch her! Period! Period! Period!
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
He thinks about naked people a lot.
Funny how the muslims don’t buy that. They say she’s asking for it. They say she’s begging for it. Uncovered meat. You have to cover the meat or the cat will come and eat it.
I am embarrassed, for him.
You tell 'em, Joe!
* Muslims and 3rd world 1st generation immigrants are excluded
This is a really screwed up sentence. The point of his statement was that no MAN had a right to touch her. This sentence says that the WOMAN ". . .had no right to receive unwanted touches from a man. That is a HUGE difference in wording.
Only Bill Clinton could possibly look more absurd making such a statement
Numerous photos show Slow Joe groping women in PUBLIC and he gets a free pass. Imagine what the dirty rat does in private...
He said this at a Women's Summit? Not a good choice of words.
Women in this country better wake up, and wake up fast.
While it may feel good to use the heavy hand of the Federal Government to subjugate the male of the species, that same government is relocating and/or allowing thousands upon thousands of truly vile, violent men who aim to do unspeakable things to us all, including the American female.
People like Crazy Joe are not the friend of women, and should be ignored.
So what did Joe do? Step outside his planar existence and rise above his physical self groping that ass and condemns from the ethereal plane?
Really Joe? Reaaaaalllllllyyyyy?
This is a really screwed up sentence. The point of his statement was that no MAN had a right to touch her. This sentence says that the WOMAN ". . .had no right to receive unwanted touches from a man. That is a HUGE difference in wording.
------------------
Because of course, she secretly wants to be touched, but only by the right man (and not woman Joe?)
You're right, only a psychiatrist could decipher all this hidden motives in that sentence.
Muslims clearly have a different take on the presence of a “naked woman”. This is so abhorrent to Islam on so many levels, it would surely boggle the mind of every Islamic in the world. First, that a female would even attempt such an act of defiance to the natural superiority of the wisdom of males. Then, to allow the very nakedness to be seen, especially the long tresses atop her head, covered not in any way, an affront to the Prophet himself. And to be unaccompanied by any male relative, that is even more of a scandal in their eyes that even the nakedness.
It is rather fun to see Islamic heads exploding. Almost as much fun as watching liberals’ heads bursting wide open.
Can’t touch the ladies, but it is ok to watch them pee.
What is this idiot smoking...?
That brain aneurism damage of 25 years ago, suffered by slow Joe, is beginning to show itself on a regular basis.
I’m going out on a limb, but if a woman walks stark naked into the Capitol, I bet a freaking ton of security guards will touch here.
Well she can be detained, so a cop can then arrest her.
If a naked woman starts assaulting a guy, the guy can fight back.
If a naked woman is about to use a weapon on someone, she is gonna be touched and stopped.
So even Joe is wrong about that.
What a moron.
“...she has a right to be arrested...” idiot. No, we have a duty and responsibility, and we have the right, to arrest her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.