Posted on 06/09/2016 2:24:01 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
Donald Trump’s team is hunkering down to draft the charge sheet the presumptive GOP nominee will unveil against Hillary Clinton on Monday, intent on laying out a credible general election argument that leads voters to question her trustworthiness.
Senior campaign advisers beginning to focus on the speech cast it Wednesday as “all about pivoting to the general election.”
But many Republicans worry that the former reality TV star’s penchant for focusing on the Clintons’ personal lives and scandals of years past — he declared them “fair game” months ago as he bulldozed to the finish line of a Republican primary — could undermine the more disciplined case party leaders have been making against Clinton for a year — that the Democrat’s email controversy and actions in Benghazi show she is too irresponsible to be commander in chief.
--------------------------------------
“Trump’s advisers believe Hillary has three major vulnerabilities,” a Trump insider said Wednesday, referring to alleged “epic corruption of the Clinton Foundation” and exorbitant speaking fees, which the source dismissed as “payoffs and bribes”; Clinton’s tenure at the State Department and lingering questions about the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya; her use of a private email server; the nexus between the State Department and the foundation; and Clinton’s efforts to “discredit and intimidate” women who might have been involved with her husband.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Glad he’s not following RNC SOP. Roll over and play dead.
Bookmark
Put it on a big 10’x10’ poster and insert her pic at top as a mugshot, put it up on stage.
<><> alleged “epic corruption of the Clinton Foundation”
<><> exorbitant speaking fees, more like “payoffs and bribes”;
<><> Hillary's shady tenure at the State Department ($6 billion went missing under her watch);
<><> lingering questions about the 2012 attacks in Benghazi;
<><> Hillary's insistence on the use of a private email server that undermined US ntl security;
<><> the nexus between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation (the FBI observes "selling access" was a major activity);
<><> Hillary's efforts to “discredit and intimidate” women involved with her husband.
Agreed....
I am concerned about the lack of a ground game strategy based on the electoral college dynamics...
Though the GOPe has been wrong on just about everything about Trump, I do think they are right about needing a strong ground game in swing states...
It's getting late in that game...to start building one..
Clinton has a huge advantage in that piece of the game...as of now..
...... Hope Trump is ready for the “Trump plans to sell off our National Parks” accusations that will be launched when Obama visits Carlsbad Caverns National Park next week.
Did you think the COngress and the Administration was protecting her for FREE??
The prelude to this Trump speech on MOnday is Ryan going on a Sunday show to trash Trump. He’s already taped it apparently. So the MSM backdrop to this event on Monday will be a Republican Speaker of the House campaigning for Hillary.
“Waste no energy on #nevertrumps and go after her.”
You can shut those dweebs up with a simple tweet telling them to “shut up”. :-). They live life in fear since they basically beg for public cash for a living.
=========================================
Donald needs to emphasize that Hillary does have a knack for negotiation (/smirk). Here's Hillary's conditions for making those $300,000 speeches.
==============================================
WASH/PO By Rosalind S. Helderman and Philip Rucker
Plans for UCLA visit give rare glimpse into Hillary Clinton’s paid speaking career.....she was paid $300,000 to speak to UCLA students and faculty in March. (UCLA)
When officials at the University of California at Los Angeles began negotiating a $300,000 speech appearance by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the school had one request: Could we get a reduced rate for public universities? The answer from Clinton’s representatives: $300,000 is the “special university rate.”
That e-mail exchange and other internal communications, obtained this week by The Washington Post under a Freedom of Information Act request, provide a rare glimpse into the complex and meticulous backstage efforts to manage the likely 2016 presidential candidate’s lucrative speaking career.
At UCLA, efforts to book Clinton and then prepare for her visit were all-consuming, beginning almost immediately after she left her job as secretary of state on Feb. 1, 2013, until she delivered her Luskin Lecture for Thought Leadership speech on March 5, 2014.
The documents show that Clinton’s representatives at the Harry Walker Agency exerted considerable control over her appearance and managed even the smallest details — from requesting lemon wedges and water on stage to a computer, scanner, and a spread of hummus and crudité in the green room backstage.
Gene Block, UCLA’s chief executive and chancellor, presents a medal to Hillary Rodham Clinton after her speech at the school March 5. (Nick Ut/AP)
Top university officials discussed at length the style and color of the executive armchairs Clinton and moderator Lynn Vavreck would sit in as they carried on a question-and-answer session, as well as the kind of pillows to be situated on each chair. Clinton’s representatives requested that the chairs be outfitted with two long, rectangular pillows — and that two cushions be kept backstage in case the chair was too deep and she needed additional back support.
After a lengthy call with a Clinton representative, UCLA administrator Patricia Lippert reported to campus colleagues, “She uses a lavalier [microphone] and will both speak from the audience and walk around stage, TED talk style. We need a teleprompter and 2-3 downstage scrolling monitors [for] her to read from.”
During a walk-through of Royce Hall five days before the lecture, the e-mails show, Clinton’s team rejected the podium planned for her use during her 20- to 30-minute speech, setting off a scramble on campus to find a suitable podium and rent a new university seal to match.
In the nearly two years since stepping down as secretary of state, Clinton has made dozens of paid appearances across the country at industry conventions and Wall Street banks as well as at universities. Her UCLA fee, like those at other universities, went to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the family’s nonprofit group.
But critics have argued that the carefully staged events and high speaking fees could complicate Clinton’s ability to run a populist campaign built around the economic struggles of the middle class.
Versions of Clinton’s standard speaking contracts have surfaced publicly this year — including her luxury travel requirements — but the contracts do not contain the extensive detail seen in the UCLA communications.
It is unclear how personally involved Clinton was in the UCLA negotiations and whether the requests from her agency were being directed by her or merely from underlings anticipating her preferences. A Clinton spokesman declined to comment on the speaking arrangements.
It is commonplace for celebrity speakers to request special accommodations — and Clinton was no exception. Her representatives asked for a case of still water, room temperature, to be deposited stage right. They also asked that “a carafe of warm/hot water, coffee cup and saucer, pitcher of room temperature water, water glass, and lemon wedges” be situated both on a table on stage as well as in another room where Clinton would stand for photos with VIPs.
For the green room, Clinton’s representatives requested: “Coffee, tea, room temp sparkling and still water, diet ginger ale, crudité, hummus and sliced fruit.” They also asked for a computer, mouse and printer, as well as a scanner, which the university had to purchase for the occasion.
When university officials decided to award Clinton the UCLA Medal, Clinton’s team asked that it be presented to her in a box rather than draped around her neck. That request was sent to the university’s chancellor, Gene Block.
“Chancellor Block has agreed to accommodate Hillary Clinton’s request to have the medal presented in a box,” Assistant Provost Margaret Leal-Sotelo wrote in one e-mail.
Lippert replied: “I can either have the jewelers box open or closed, in case the Chancellor doesn’t want to risk opening it.” By contract, Clinton’s approval was needed for any promotional materials. Clinton gave permission for the university to record the event, but “for archival purposes only.”
For public distribution, Clinton’s speaking agency approved only a two-minute highlight video to upload to YouTube. “Please make sure it is available only for one (1) year from the date of posting,” a Harry Walker Agency official added.
Clinton posed for individual photos with 100 VIPS, or 50 couples — “We get a total of 50 clicks,” one university official explained — as well as two group photos. Lippert wrote to colleagues that Clinton’s representatives wanted the group shots “prestaged,” with participants assembled and ready to take the photographs before Clinton arrived “so the secretary isn’t waiting for these folks to get their act together.” Reiterating the request, Lippert added, “She doesn’t like to stand around waiting for people.”
Like many major universities, UCLA regularly pays high-profile speakers to visit campus. Many of the visits are funded through a private endowment and not with tuition or public dollars. Clinton’s appearance was privately funded as part of a lecture series endowed by Meyer Luskin, an investor and president of Scope Industries, a food waste recycling company.
redneck rassler too (wwe)
What has she EVER accomplished of any value?
Nothing
[Trump’s advisers believe Hillary has these major vulnerabilities]
Don’t forget the stolen White House silverware.
OK....will add.
OK....will add....
And how they trashed the White House when they left, including taking the letters off the typewriters.
“Waste no energy on #nevertrumps and go after her.”
That’s exactly right and he’s doing just that.
But I’m getting a little confused here. Up until a few weeks ago I could maybe kinda sorta understand #nevertrumps when they could remotely hold out hopes of an upset.
Now it is rock solid carved in stone that Trump is the nominee and he won by huge margins, but they are still going to boycott? I have to start accepting the reality that they really are on the other side - they really want the progressive agenda and support HRC.
Unbelievable, but yet I’m now forced to believe. They are all traitors to the conservative cause that they claim to be the champions of.
Disgusting people.
I don't think it's a winning formula to woo Democrats...I know Democrats...They just don't care...
If Trump wants to win enough Democrat voters to win this election he will have to go anti Republican and support more jobs with good wages...Affordable health care...
Of course, anyone can do a web search and find out pretty quickly. And once they find out, the parallels between the Clintons and “Boss” Tweed are pretty shocking....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.