It’s difficult to see Trump’s litigation strategy here. If Trump really thinks that being a Mexican, donation to Clinton and being an immigration advocate disqualifies a judge, he is wrong. If he thinks the judge is going to remove himself, or be removed, he doesn’t know the law. If he thinks that this will somehow make the judge rule his way, he’s a fool.
Clinton, Sanders and Trump are the worst presidential candidates of my lifetime.
By talking about it it deflates the issue down the road - there can be no October Surprises with Trump. While Clinton refuses to discuss any scandal Trump takes it on full frontal.
You’re obviously a fool and an “oilpainter” but you’re just pretending to be a lawyer...Right?
Even if Trump is forced to eat damages on his controversial business school, now he’s turned the situation into a testimony to his resolve on the Hispanic-illegale issue. And so whatever enemies he gains could well be counterbalanced by the friends he also gains.
It’s been reported that Curiel is associated with an attorneys’ organization that in turn refers to the National Council of La Raza. If so, that should be a radioactive conflict of interest sign, but if Curiel believes in scorched earth, he hasn’t even seen political fire yet.
I think you’d better shut your mouth about Trump and take a hike before Jim does it for you.
Hey I heard there’s a new paint by number kit available at Michael’s. Its a zot. :-)
Two points:
(1) You write: “Its difficult to see Trumps litigation strategy here....If he thinks that this will somehow make the judge rule his way, hes a fool.”
But Trump is running for President. His attacks on the judge are probably related to that rather than “litigation strategy.”
(2) You write: “If Trump really thinks that being a Mexican, donation to Clinton and being an immigration advocate disqualifies a judge, he is wrong.”
“La Raza” means “The Race.” It is a radical, left-wing, racist organization that advocates a Mexican conquest of the US Southwest. Calling him an “immigration advocate” is like calling Rambo a “problem solver.”
No member of La Raza should sit on the federal bench—that he is a judge is an outrage. He should certainly recuse himself in a case featuring the world’s most prominent advocate of a wall. It is like if a member of Aryan Nation sat as the judge on Al Sharpton’s tax fraud trial (OK, Sharpton will never be brought to justice—but if he were). The two cases are no different and the left shouldn’t get a pass. Shining the spotlight on this judge is not wrong—it’s a good thing.
No, he makes any ruling against him look fraudulent in the eyes of the voting public. It is smart so that if he loses, the public discounts it.
No. You obviously are ignorant of the following fact: this Judge is a member of the La Raza group. They are racists.
This Judge should never have been assigned to this case. He is biased.
If a Judge was a member of the KKK, you bet there would be charges of racism by a black litigant.
I think there is more at play here. Trump really isn’t stupid. He is smart.
He is playing the same game among the general population that the elites have played for years—point at a particular aspect and history of someone who is (from his POV) hindering him.
By doing so, he is showing Joe and Jill Sixpack that when the left attacks him for any given aspect, Joe and Jill Sixpack will be able to say to each other, “Well, wait, isn’t that what Trump says about _______?” The attack from the left then tends to fall flat.
“If Trump really thinks that being a Mexican, donation to Clinton and being an immigration advocate disqualifies a judge, he is wrong.”
However, if he thinks that being a bigot who belongs to a violent anti-American organization *should* disqualify a judge, he is right.
“If he thinks the judge is going to remove himself, or be removed, he doesnt know the law.”
Of course this bigot is not going to recuse himself. Why should he, when he has such a clear chance to harm the US? As for being removed, well, that could happen. Actually, if he fails to recuse himself that could lead to his being removed from the bench.
“Clinton, Sanders and Trump are the worst presidential candidates of my lifetime.”
Road apples. Take that Trump-bashing crap back to DU.
You are on the wrong forum, but I suspect you won’t be here much longer.
~~Vote Trump 2016~~ ~~Vote Trump 2016~~ ~~Vote Trump 2016~~
Its difficult to see Trumps litigation strategy here. If Trump really thinks that being a Mexican, donation to Clinton and being an immigration advocate disqualifies a judge, he is wrong. If he thinks the judge is going to remove himself, or be removed, he doesnt know the law. If he thinks that this will somehow make the judge rule his way, hes a fool.
______________________
Trump has shown the judge is corrupt. 100% corrupt. That is all that matters.
Judges hate this kind of exposure.
I mean give me a break. He makes all the Trump U documents available to the public and in 24 hours he says that he goofed and reseals them but not before inflicting maximum damage on Trump.
The case is now so tainted that Trump will win handily.
He is no fool!
He knows damn well this entire "lawsuit" by NY AG Schneiderman -- and the selection of this La Raza judge -- is a scam and a fraud. "Litigation strategy" is irrelevant. the only thing to do is attack the entire system as corrupt and attack to destroy.
If Trump really thinks that being a Mexican, donation to Clinton and being an immigration advocate disqualifies a judge, he is wrong.”
Do you have any idea how retarded you sound?
All illegals should be deported on sight. Cuff ‘em and stuff ‘em. Let them come back legally if they can, but with so many being human filth... f those bitches.
The judge is a racist. He is a member of La Raza. He has to be exposed for exactly what he is. He could have only been appointed by a racist democrat which he was because Obama appointed him.
When a judge is a member of an egregiously racist group such as the “La Raza” racists, AKA , the “Klan With A Tan”, that judge’s impartiality IS open to questioning.
Would any non-Libtard consider a KKK member to be an impartial judge in a case where a black raped/killed a white girl?