Posted on 06/02/2016 6:08:08 AM PDT by Mariner
Still, there are still a BUNCH of NeoCons in the Republican party who are likely to hear the siren song that leads to disaster.
This year the Democrats will run to the "right" of the Republican on Foreign Policy.
PIAPS fail
Ambassador Stevens isn’t available to comment on how dangerous Clinton’s policies are.
Trump Builds, Clinton Kills.
Yeah that going to sell with an American people. We come full cirle. Clinton Inc won in 1992 by making it all about “the Economy”. Bush I tried to run on Foreign Policy. NOW Clinton inc are the ones trying to run on Foreign Policy!
Dangerous, too bad we can’t ask our late ambassador Chris Stevens how dangerous Hillary’s leadership is.
After BENGHAZI, that is a completely ridiculous position to take for her. She has the worst track record of bad decisions for a SOS ever............................
As compared to What? Her Russia Reset, Arab Spring, Benghazi, Iran, China takeover of South China Sea. North Korea?
She’s done a HELL of a Job /sarc.
An army of strawmen, coming right up. The press will help this effort, lying comes naturally for the press too.
Yeah, dangerous to her ability to personally profit from foreign leaders.
Yeah, Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy as Secretary of State was so stellar. Uh-huh. She and Obummer set the Middle East on fire.
Then there were all the technology transfers to China for campaign contributions during her “husband’s” terms which made China’s ICBM’s more accurate. Traitors.
And let’s not forget selling American uranium lands to the Russians....another Hitlery “deal.”
And she has the nerve to criticize Donald Trump? That’s rich.
He’s setting a trap for her. And she’s walking right into it.
The Neo Cons eventually have to come to the sickening realization that the Democratic Party is now effectively anti Zionist. They would be making a huge gamble if they abandoned the Republican Party. The reality of the State Dept controlled by snippy anti Zionists combined with a deteriorated, low morale military under the clueless President Hillary Clinton should be a sobering thought.
Yeah! Why doesn’t Trump want to give American weapons systems to jihadis, to start destabilising wars across the world?
As dangerous as abandoning Iran’s Young People’s Arab Spring upheaval?, as dangerous as toppling Libya?, as dangerous as toppling Egypt?, as dangerous as f@cking up Syria and misreading the Russians? As dangerous as that, you bitch?
NOW THAT WOULD BE A BRILLIANT ADD..... Start with black screen, put up quote of Hillary saying Trumps foreign policy ideas are dangerous.... cut to flag draped coffin... Ambassador Stevens unavailable for comment... fade to black....
Look around: China, North Korea, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, ISIS, Europe... How's the libtard foreign policy been working these last few years? {snort} Well, I guess it has made Clinton Inc. wildly rich... Funny, selling out your Country for profit used to be called treason, now I guess it is libtard "policy."
Oh, wait ...
Notice she never uses Rodham any more.
The Counterpunch is going to hurt worse. Probably having to do with Bill giving our military hardware secrets to China for some cash. But, that might just be hearsay. /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.