Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton to Portray Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Positions as Dangerous
The New York Times ^ | June 1st, 2016 | By AMY CHOZICK

Posted on 06/02/2016 6:08:08 AM PDT by Mariner

Hillary Clinton plans to deliver a scorching assessment of Donald J. Trump’s foreign policy prescriptions on Thursday, casting her likely Republican rival as a threat to decades of bipartisan tenets of American diplomacy and declaring him unfit for the presidency.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign aides said the speech, which she will deliver in San Diego, would be the start of a persistent assault to portray a potential Trump presidency as a dangerous proposition that would weaken American alliances and embolden enemies.

The argument will include specific criticism of comments Mr. Trump has made about rethinking the United States’s support of NATO; his proposal to allow Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons; his vow to temporarily bar Muslims from entering the United States; and his pledge to advance the use of torture and kill the families of suspected terrorists.

But Mrs. Clinton will also invoke her experiences as secretary of state, including in 2011 when she supported President Obama’s decision to send Navy SEALs on a raid in Pakistan that killed Osama bin Laden, to make the case that Mr. Trump does not have the temperament to make such decisions.

“Donald Trump is unlike any presidential candidate we’ve seen, maybe ever, certainly in decades, in that he does not cross the threshold of fitness for the job,” said Jake Sullivan, Mrs. Clinton’s top policy adviser, who helped draft the speech.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 900fbifiles; benghazi; foster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Yes, the NeoCons came from the Democrat party and still have great affinity for it.

Still, there are still a BUNCH of NeoCons in the Republican party who are likely to hear the siren song that leads to disaster.

This year the Democrats will run to the "right" of the Republican on Foreign Policy.

1 posted on 06/02/2016 6:08:08 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

PIAPS fail


2 posted on 06/02/2016 6:11:17 AM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Ambassador Stevens isn’t available to comment on how dangerous Clinton’s policies are.

Trump Builds, Clinton Kills.


3 posted on 06/02/2016 6:12:38 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yeah that going to sell with an American people. We come full cirle. Clinton Inc won in 1992 by making it all about “the Economy”. Bush I tried to run on Foreign Policy. NOW Clinton inc are the ones trying to run on Foreign Policy!


4 posted on 06/02/2016 6:12:53 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Dangerous, too bad we can’t ask our late ambassador Chris Stevens how dangerous Hillary’s leadership is.


5 posted on 06/02/2016 6:13:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

After BENGHAZI, that is a completely ridiculous position to take for her. She has the worst track record of bad decisions for a SOS ever............................


6 posted on 06/02/2016 6:14:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
to portray a potential Trump presidency as a dangerous proposition that would weaken American alliances and embolden enemies.

Trump's response to THAT is gonna be priceless!


7 posted on 06/02/2016 6:14:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

As compared to What? Her Russia Reset, Arab Spring, Benghazi, Iran, China takeover of South China Sea. North Korea?

She’s done a HELL of a Job /sarc.


8 posted on 06/02/2016 6:14:12 AM PDT by wetgundog ("Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is No Vice" -AuH2O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Heh. What Hillary is going to do is make up some foreign policy and policy positions that Trump does not have, and then explain how these made up policies are harmful.

An army of strawmen, coming right up. The press will help this effort, lying comes naturally for the press too.

9 posted on 06/02/2016 6:14:43 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yeah, dangerous to her ability to personally profit from foreign leaders.


10 posted on 06/02/2016 6:15:36 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yeah, Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy as Secretary of State was so stellar. Uh-huh. She and Obummer set the Middle East on fire.

Then there were all the technology transfers to China for campaign contributions during her “husband’s” terms which made China’s ICBM’s more accurate. Traitors.

And let’s not forget selling American uranium lands to the Russians....another Hitlery “deal.”

And she has the nerve to criticize Donald Trump? That’s rich.


11 posted on 06/02/2016 6:15:48 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The GOPe must be defeated.....the sooner the better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

He’s setting a trap for her. And she’s walking right into it.


12 posted on 06/02/2016 6:15:58 AM PDT by mmichaels1970 (Hillary lied over four coffins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The Neo Cons eventually have to come to the sickening realization that the Democratic Party is now effectively anti Zionist. They would be making a huge gamble if they abandoned the Republican Party. The reality of the State Dept controlled by snippy anti Zionists combined with a deteriorated, low morale military under the clueless President Hillary Clinton should be a sobering thought.


13 posted on 06/02/2016 6:17:05 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yeah! Why doesn’t Trump want to give American weapons systems to jihadis, to start destabilising wars across the world?


14 posted on 06/02/2016 6:17:26 AM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

As dangerous as abandoning Iran’s Young People’s Arab Spring upheaval?, as dangerous as toppling Libya?, as dangerous as toppling Egypt?, as dangerous as f@cking up Syria and misreading the Russians? As dangerous as that, you bitch?


15 posted on 06/02/2016 6:17:34 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

NOW THAT WOULD BE A BRILLIANT ADD..... Start with black screen, put up quote of Hillary saying Trumps foreign policy ideas are dangerous.... cut to flag draped coffin... Ambassador Stevens unavailable for comment... fade to black....


16 posted on 06/02/2016 6:19:23 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Great thinkin' there Hillary...'cause we all know how well appeasement and pandering to our enemies works out. Just ask any of the tens of millions of dead from the wars of last century about that.

Look around: China, North Korea, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, ISIS, Europe... How's the libtard foreign policy been working these last few years? {snort} Well, I guess it has made Clinton Inc. wildly rich... Funny, selling out your Country for profit used to be called treason, now I guess it is libtard "policy."

17 posted on 06/02/2016 6:21:18 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Yes, Hillary, let's take this country back to the bipartisan tenets of American diplomacy that the Democrats demonstrated during the George W. Bush years.

Oh, wait ...

18 posted on 06/02/2016 6:21:26 AM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Notice she never uses Rodham any more.


19 posted on 06/02/2016 6:22:12 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The Counterpunch is going to hurt worse. Probably having to do with Bill giving our military hardware secrets to China for some cash. But, that might just be hearsay. /s


20 posted on 06/02/2016 6:23:36 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson