Posted on 06/02/2016 5:29:52 AM PDT by HomerBohn
A mother and her lesbian partner not only engaged in unnatural acts with each other, but apparently had seared their consciences so bad that they engaged in abuse of the mother's two-year-old boy to such an extent that the boy died.
Rachel Fee, 31, and Nyomi Fee, 29 were convicted of killing Liam Fee by causing severe blunt force trauma to his little body at a house in Fife, Scotland.
That was not all. These two degenerates caused Liam to endure a very short life of pain and abuse, along with his brother.
These two women engaged in such behavior as locking the boys in cages, given cold showers, tied up in a dark room where snakes and rats were kept, and forcing them to eat dog feces and their own vomit.
The Mirror reports:
The couple were convicted of all eight charges they faced, with a majority verdict returned on the murder charge after around 10 hours of deliberations by the jury.
In addition to this charge, the pair were found guilty of assaulting Liam over a period of more than two years prior to his death by jurors at the High Court in Livingston.
They were also convicted of ill-treating and neglecting the toddler January 2012 onwards by leaving him for prolonged periods of time, failing to provide him with adequate exercise and mental stimulation and - in the days leading up to his death - failing to get him proper medical attention for a broken leg and a fractured arm.
At an earlier hearing, paediatric pathologist Dr Paul French had told how Liam died after suffering a ruptured heart caused by a severe blunt force injury to his torso.
Horrific as the fatal injury was, it was far from the only injury suffered by Liam during his short life.
The pathologist found fractures to the boy's upper arm and thigh, likely sustained in separate events in the hours and days before the child died.
The women also attempted to blame Liam's death on another young boy.
Jurors cried as video showed Liam's body was presented in court. His body dressed in cartoon character pajamas with a duvet covering him up to his neck.
The report says that neither of the women showed any remorse for their crimes when they were convicted.
Biblical justice would require that both these women pay with their lives. Jesus was clear about harming little ones.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. Matthew 18:6
Homosexual behavior is an abomination as well.
The lack of incorruptible people, morally upright enough to do the job, may be regrettable. Jesus had a thought on this.
Good comment, indeed. Torturous punishment leads to cutting the hands off of thieves and beheading blasphemers, which amounts to a spectical and reduces us to savages. Just quick and effective without all the sport. I think it sends a better message by denying celebrity to the scumbag. Let their names be buried with them.
You miss the point. Do you have small children? Are you getting enough exercise for them? Who will you let monitor your children for exercise?
How did I know, before reading even the excerpt, that the toddler was a boy. I’m surprised there isn’t some government program now that will pay for infant sex changes.
Amen.
Where did I say that? I said she "gets pregnant." Unless she was raped, she had the final word on whether she would have sex or not.
And I don't see the father(s?) of her children breaking their arms and legs and finally killing them. So however responsible or irresponsible he (they) was (were), this is not about him (them).
However this doomed little boy came into existence, he has a natural father out there somewhere.
That natural father is AWOL for whatever reason. He's the sperm vendor (oops, "donor") who disappears after he pocketing his pittance for his 5 ml of fatherhood; or he's the drunken hit-and-run inseminator, or the bye-bye husband (unlikely, with the lesbian dam, but possible) ---
For whatever reason, as I said, he's a gone dude. Thus he is, will-he or nill-he, one half of the problem.
The child has a natural right to his natural father for identity, for one half of his kinship universe, for providence, and yes, for protection.
The fact that the natural father never assumed his obligations, is part of the reason why this little boy is dead.
“100 lashes with a brine-soaked rattan cane, then hanged by the neck until quite dead. “
This is the UK, they’ll be “strongly cautioned.”
I agree that his irresonsibility contributed in some measure to the situation these unfortunates found themselves in, but he did not beat them, torture them, and finally kill them. He just left them to be be beaten, tortured, and finally killed.
So yes, he is as big a POS as the deviant sadists who snuffed the life from that child, but his was a sin of omission. He was notable only by his absence.
The only consolation I can muster is that this child is in the arms of Jesus now and he will know what real love is. Liam certainly never knew it on Earth. May these two monsters be damned to Hell for all time and suffer what they did to this innocent child.
Even with it, it's not very funny in a case like this. Not at all.
The canard about whose most dangerous of all to kids.....it ain’t daddy
Men are more wired not to kill spawn
Woman in home not related to child......most likely to harm child
Blood moms kill more than blood dads
Not counting abortion
Fembots who don’t want kids anyhow have constructed a false narrative
“”Might not a cherry picker work better?””
Yes - the right word wouldn’t come to mind when I was writing. I thought about “boom” but I guess “cherry picker” is the same thing, right?
Sins of omission can be fatal that way.
I never agreed with JPII about the death penalty, and I always thought he played right into the hands of the Bernardins, always ready to help Catholics rationalize voting for pro-aborts. As Mario Cuomo said, “The Pope is saying that ‘pro-life’ isn’t just about abortion.”
In the last 20-some years, no execution has ever been carried out without a statement from the local bishop calling for “mercy.” The rigid fulfillment of this duty is astounding.
Someday many Americans will gladly volunteer for the job of wielding a brine-soaked rattan cane on the back of one of those who has caused the demise of this nation.
Let the incorrigible evil ones, the murderers, those who have committed so many depraved-heart crimes--- yet having been given a chance to repent, and may God have mercy on their souls--- be executed.
And that, in a solemn manner, as befits men: swift, sure, and certain.
too good. LEt them be slowed tortured over days, months, years.
I wrote that for two reasons:
1. To dispel this myth that mothers are by nature better parents than fathers. This poor child (this poor victim of our failed social experiments) had not one but two mommies and they couldn't muster a grain of morality between them to stop what they were doing.
2. To show that 5000 years of traditional families have proven what the best structure is for children. Allowing same-sex couples to adopt children is a recipe for disaster and the victims of that disaster will be the children themselves, whose moral compass is being and will continue to be smashed to bits by a socio-political agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.