Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Theranos founder's net worth goes from $4.5 BILLION to nothing amid fraud claims
Daily Mail ^ | 1 June 2016 | Regina F. Graham For Dailymail.com

Posted on 06/01/2016 11:50:25 AM PDT by CorporateStepsister

Last year she was on top of the world, but now Elizabeth Holmes has a net worth of zero.

Holmes, who is the founder of blood-testing company Theranos, was at the top of Forbes' list of the richest self-made women in America with a net worth of $4.5billion last year.

However, Forbes has lowered their estimate of her net worth to nothing, amid allegations that the blood-testing company she founded in 2003 has inaccurate tests and is being investigated by federal agencies.

Theranos Inc was sued on Thursday, accused of endangering customer health through 'massive failures' that misrepresented the accuracy and quality of its blood tests, according to court papers.

The proposed class action was brought in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by the law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodtesting; california; federalagencies; forbes; fraud; health; medicaid; medicare; networth; selfmadewomen; testing; theranos; theranosinc; usdistrictcourt; wealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: BipolarBob

“Maybe she wasn’t a crook.”

Maybe.


21 posted on 06/01/2016 2:47:41 PM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

But, But, But; can I keep the STUFF.


22 posted on 06/01/2016 2:50:27 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Yes; I also was born a poor black child, but can I keep the stuff?


23 posted on 06/01/2016 2:54:22 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CorporateStepsister

If she had good lawyers, she sold it least $50 million of her stock, which should have netted her after-tax at least $35 million, at least half of which she moved offshore to be out of reach of any creditors.


24 posted on 06/01/2016 3:04:41 PM PDT by only1percent ( who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

That’s all I’m saying.


25 posted on 06/01/2016 3:26:43 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CorporateStepsister

Cangingnametouranus


26 posted on 06/01/2016 3:38:46 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Yeah, but after that, her gig might end.


27 posted on 06/01/2016 4:41:43 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CorporateStepsister
Went to bed a multi-billionaire and wakes up to having nothing.

You'd think that she would have a little something (cash, jewels, gold etc.) stashed away where the cops couldn't get at it.

28 posted on 06/01/2016 5:46:18 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I don’t think she was thinking of that. I don’t think she’s in a good place right now, with the collapse of her company.


29 posted on 06/01/2016 6:17:21 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

However, some successful women end up having been crooks all along, just like some men are. It’s there that I do not see a difference between businessmen and businesswomen.


30 posted on 06/02/2016 1:34:24 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

The problem is that their machines WEREN’T 91% accurate. I’ve read other stories where accuracies varied from 65% to 80%.

Further, I’ve also read where Theranos started into subcontracting their tests to an outside firm, not using their machines - this apparently is illegal.


31 posted on 11/24/2016 2:39:30 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson