Do Biological Facts No Longer Matter?

The pushback has been swift and strong against Target’s unsafe bathroom policy, along with the Obama administration’s demand that all public schools adopt pro-transgender policies for showers and locker rooms. But for long-term success against these impositions, the response must also be strategic.

The roots of moral issues always bring us to questions about human nature. Both classical Greek and Christian philosophy regarded the natural world as purpose driven or teleological – from the Greek telos, meaning purpose or goal. To ordinary human observation, it is evident that eyes are for seeing and ears for hearing; fins are for swimming and wings for flying.

Because the human body is part of nature, it too was regarded as having a purpose. The delightful diversity of male and female was not some cosmic accident. Instead it showed that the human body is ordered to the purpose of opposite-sex pair-bonding and reproduction. Teleology is the basis for natural law ethics, which aims to tell us how to fulfill our true nature, how to become fully human.

Today it is popular among Western elites to deny teleology. The key turning point was Charles Darwin. He did not deny that nature appears to be designed for a purpose. But as an agnostic, he hoped to use science to demonstrate that the appearance of design was the result of purposeless material process – random variations sifted by the blind, automatic forces of natural selection.

As historian Jacques Barzun writes, “This denial of purpose is Darwin’s distinctive contention.”

The Darwinian worldview implies that the cosmos is merely a vast amoral machine. It reduces the human body to a lump of matter, a collection of atoms and molecules, not intrinsically different from any other chance configuration of matter. There can be no natural law ethic because humanity has no purpose to fulfill. Philosopher Charles Taylor explains, “The cosmos is no longer seen as the embodiment of meaningful order which can define the good for us.”

The implication is that our biological identity as male and female is a cosmic accident after all. The sexual differentiation of male and female has no special dignity or meaning. The body is reduced to raw material to be manipulated and controlled to serve human needs and preferences – like any other natural resource.

These are the assumptions lurking behind the language of the transgender movement. The Obama administration’s letter, sent out jointly by the Departments of Justice and Education, asserts, “A person’s gender identity may be different from ... the person’s sex assigned at birth.” What's the key word here? “Assigned” – as though a person’s sex at birth were purely arbitrary instead of a scientific, biological fact.

What does that language imply? That biological facts do not matter. Your biology gives no clue to your gender identity. It is irrelevant to the “authentic self.” The result is a fragmented, dualistic worldview that denigrates the physical body as inconsequential and insignificant – a worldview that alienates people from their own bodies.

Consider a recent case in the Fourth Circuit, in which a girl who identified as a boy named G.G. demanded the right to use the boys’ restroom. According to the majority opinion, “G.G.’s birth-assigned sex, or so-called ‘biological sex,’ is female, but G.G.’s gender identity is male.”

Her “so-called ‘biological sex’” – in sneer quotes? This is a judge writing a formal ruling for a federal court, and he treats the very existence of biological sex with suspicion and disdain. Apparently he thinks the girl’s physiology, anatomy, chromosomes, and DNA are less real or knowable than her subjective feelings about her gender.

Is this fragmented view of sexuality actually liberating? Many who have tried it say no. Jonah Mix, who writes for “Gender Detective,” spent years immersed in queer theory, wearing makeup and nail polish: “It was in those queer circles that I first heard the common admonition to never define a person by their body.”

Eventually, however, he realized the promise of liberation was a lie. To discover whether you “identify” as a man, you must define manhood. If you do not define yourself by your biological sex, then you must define yourself by your actions. Do you act stereotypically masculine? Then you are a man. Do you behave in ways that are stereotypically feminine? You must be a woman. Queer theory actually reinforces gender stereotypes.

By contrast, if you base your identity on your physical anatomy, you can engage in a range of diverse behaviors without threatening your identity as a man. Mix writes, “When we are defined by our bodies, the whole width of human experience remains open. ... There is freedom in the body.”

On a trans website a commenter named Trish wrote, “As a little girl, I enjoyed both ballet lessons and playing in the mud. ... I liked miniskirts and wanted to be an astronaut when I grew up. It looks to me like the trans movement is fighting very hard to force everyone to choose whether to live in the blue box or the pink box, and no playing mix-and-match. To me this is the opposite of freedom.”

Contrary to what progressives say, there is greater diversity when we anchor our gender identity in the objective, scientifically knowable reality of our biology as male or female.

In culture war rhetoric, the existence of intersex people (hermaphrodites) is often used to disrupt the male/female binary. But intersex conditions are a matter of biology, not gender identity. A report filed to the European Commission in 2011 says, “Intersex people differ from trans people as their status is not gender related but instead relates to their biological makeup (genetic, hormonal and physical features).”

Policies that impose transgender ideology on children as early as kindergarten are teaching them to denigrate their own bodies – to see their biological sex as having no relevance to who they are as whole persons. Bathroom policies are teaching them that their male and female parts are not worthy of privacy and safety.

We would do well to retrieve the ancient wisdom that nature is teleological, just as people have long recognized. A teleological worldview leads to a positive view of the body; it acknowledges the purpose and dignity in being male and female; it leads to harmony between biological identity and gender identity.

And it gives a basis for welcoming common-sense protections for boys and girls as they mature into men and women – which should be one of the self-evident norms of the adults who run our governments, schools and corporations.

I vaguely remember hearing this from some time ago; I’m fairly certain it was early Obama administration. There was some harebrained scheme having to do with fighting global warming. Some dem congresscritter was told that it “violated the laws of thermodynamics.” The reply was “we’ll just have to repeal that law.”

This is more of same.

Isn’t it strange that the Charlotte Observer pontificates that scores [or hundreds or thousands] of real girls NEED to “get over” their discomfort at showering next to biological males but that those same few “transgender” males need NOT make any effort to “get over” their “discomfort” at being rejected by real girls?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!

Because I can tell you that I am old enough and my wife is old enough that if we saw someone in a restroom that was making other people uncomfortable we would either confront them ourselves or report them to the staff.

So because neither you nor your wife have had the frightening experience of seeing a biological male in the women's room, then - no problem? Never mind the growing number of cases of males (who don't even bother to present themselves as women - "the laws have changed - I have a right to be here...") who are presenting themselves in women's facilities.

I also note that you didn't address the very real concern about biological males being granted access to women's dressing rooms and shower rooms. You OK with that as well?

Oh, and by the way, this is not a distracting "non-issue" that only foolish conservative neanderthals are interested in. There is NO GREATER THREAT to our nation than the attack upon the fundamental God-ordained nature of male and female that is the basis of marriage, the family, and society itself.

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Excellent point. Where is the concern about the right of women and children not to be shocked and traumatized by the sight of a biological male presenting himself next to them in the locker/shower room?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!

You didn’t answer my question as to whether you have ever noticed a “transgender” person using a public restroom. My wife and I are both in our late 50s and have never seen this. I have asked everyone who has brought this up to me whether they have ever noticed this and the answer has always been no.

My wife has noticed men in the women’s room accompanying their young daughters. I have seen women take their little boys into the men’s room. Are you similarly freaked out by this much more common occurrence?

You are free to make as big a deal over this silliness as you want to. I am just telling you that the Obama administration is pushing this crap right now to distract people. Congratulations you are reacting exactly the way they hoped you would. Once Obama is gone everything will go back to normal. If Hillary somehow prevails expect much much, more of this kind of crap. If this is your greatest concern right now... you had best be working as hard as you can to make sure that Republicans do well next November.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.