Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tjd1454

Isn’t it strange that the Charlotte Observer pontificates that scores [or hundreds or thousands] of real girls NEED to “get over” their discomfort at showering next to biological males but that those same few “transgender” males need NOT make any effort to “get over” their “discomfort” at being rejected by real girls?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!


24 posted on 05/20/2016 1:58:19 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: pfony1; fireman15
This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Excellent point. Where is the concern about the right of women and children not to be shocked and traumatized by the sight of a biological male presenting himself next to them in the locker/shower room?

26 posted on 05/20/2016 2:10:44 PM PDT by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson