I listed what was posted to comment #1 and said,
“If there are other delegates on this committee, clue me in. These are the only ones listed.” At the time, I was unsure why they’re were not more. I was asking for information.
Lady, You have no idea whom your dealing with and who I know and don’t know. And you have no idea what access I have to find out, or how interested I may be in learning the facts. The names will be forthcoming and we will see exactly who they are.
If the ratio remains stacked with never-Trumpers, that will be a real shame and lead to greater animosity at a time when unity is the answer.
Have you emailed Ted Cruz yet, and asked him to honor his pledge to the republican party?
“Lady, You have no idea whom your dealing with and who I know and don’t know. And you have no idea what access I have to find out, or how interested I may be in learning the facts. The names will be forthcoming and we will see exactly who they are.”
Am I supposed to be impressed?
By all means, when you find out who the full committe is post the names. But you knew, per the link that YOU included, that there will be 112 and that all 112 had not yet been chosen. So, you are either trying to make yourself seem more important than you are, stir up trouble or you are posting links without reading the information. My guess is all three. Put up or shut up until you have all the info.
You have no proof and no reason to believe that the final rules committee will be “stacked” with NeverTrump other than Politico story that several other articles rely on to stir up trouble. I agree, it will be an issue IF it works out the way you are guessing it will, but at this point there is no reason to believe it will.
Have I emailed Cruz yet? Cruz said he would support the nominee. Do we have a nominee? No, we won’t have one until June. I will give him the benefit of the doubt until then. As I have said before, if he doesn’t support Trump after the convention I will be disappointed that he has broken his word. Will I be surprised? No, he’s a politician. I won’t be a part of your handwringing about it.
PS - Anyone worth “dealing with” understands the differences between your and you’re and there, they’re and their. You may consider learning the differences if you want to be force you claim.