Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

“Lady, You have no idea whom your dealing with and who I know and don’t know. And you have no idea what access I have to find out, or how interested I may be in learning the facts. The names will be forthcoming and we will see exactly who they are.”

Am I supposed to be impressed?

By all means, when you find out who the full committe is post the names. But you knew, per the link that YOU included, that there will be 112 and that all 112 had not yet been chosen. So, you are either trying to make yourself seem more important than you are, stir up trouble or you are posting links without reading the information. My guess is all three. Put up or shut up until you have all the info.

You have no proof and no reason to believe that the final rules committee will be “stacked” with NeverTrump other than Politico story that several other articles rely on to stir up trouble. I agree, it will be an issue IF it works out the way you are guessing it will, but at this point there is no reason to believe it will.

Have I emailed Cruz yet? Cruz said he would support the nominee. Do we have a nominee? No, we won’t have one until June. I will give him the benefit of the doubt until then. As I have said before, if he doesn’t support Trump after the convention I will be disappointed that he has broken his word. Will I be surprised? No, he’s a politician. I won’t be a part of your handwringing about it.


106 posted on 05/19/2016 9:29:51 AM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Roos_Girl

In this case, the media isn’t stirring up trouble. They are reporting on the Machiavellian plots Cruz has underway. You are just embarrassed (rightfully so) that the Cruz Nevertrumpers have not stopped conspiring with Ted to win. You can read that the Politico article is full of “direct quotes” from the mouths of Cruz die-hards on the Rules Committee.

You said, to me: “Put up or shut up until you have all the info.”

Very rude girl- I don’t take directions from you and will continue to post the names of obstructionists Cruz delegates as they appear from across the county.

I have posted 16 names of RNC Rules Convention Committee Members.

You have posted ZERO names and continue to defend obstructionists.

There will be more obstructionists, like this one of YOURS from CO-Guy Short. He wants to reset the party power structure. Short plans to propose a “conscience clause.” The clause turns all the delegates into Super Delegates, just like the Democrats. It could open up the convention to multiple rounds of balloting, or they might all just stand up for TRUMP. Enough is enough.


110 posted on 05/19/2016 10:03:05 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Roos_Girl; Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Cruz said he would support the nominee. Do we have a nominee? No, we won’t have one until June.

That's YOUR position.

I don't think that's the position of the owner/operator of this website.

You might want to get your mind right, Roos.

112 posted on 05/19/2016 3:47:04 PM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson