Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ginsburg In 1975: Separate Bathrooms Are ‘In Some Situations Required
Daily Caller ^ | 05.10.2016 | Steve Guest

Posted on 05/10/2016 8:36:05 PM PDT by ameribbean expat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Mears

Just a joke about the beatnik poet and the stupid situation at hand.


21 posted on 05/10/2016 9:33:16 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

-—Ginsberg probably doesn’t now agree with her earlier statements - because...
.
.
.
...she’s senile


22 posted on 05/10/2016 9:35:26 PM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (I think I'm the RiNO - because I ain't buyin' what the RNC is sellin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Any doubt in your mind that she has “evolved”?


23 posted on 05/10/2016 9:38:55 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

The Hag will Flip-Flop like a fish.


24 posted on 05/10/2016 9:42:08 PM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus headsConservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat
Senator Larry Craig promises to fight with all he's got against single entry restrooms.

 photo 6E582F92-ABFE-40B6-8F5E-125A8E59657F_zpstbdid5si.jpg

25 posted on 05/10/2016 9:48:00 PM PDT by Yaelle (Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg


26 posted on 05/10/2016 10:32:18 PM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus headsConservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

know I won’t be going into any Target stores, staying at any Marriott hotels, or using Paypal. How many others are doing that? I have no idea.”

Trump said he is going to welcome the queers and perverts to use the ladies room in his properties.


27 posted on 05/11/2016 1:27:25 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Giggles the pig for POTUS - 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
I expressed my developing thought on a thread yesterday:

For a woman or girl in a sexually difficult environment or for one who has been sexually abused, not having privacy when having to use a public rest room could be devastating. What about girls and women who go to the rest room to get away from a guy situation? What about monthly situations which for most women are as private and personal as it gets? What about girls and women with strict religious convictions for whom this is totally out of bounds? All of that goes beyond the obvious problem of pervs dressing up as women to abuse girls and women.

It's about erasing all individual identity, including sexual.

28 posted on 05/11/2016 3:28:52 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Again, women are the losers

yeah, but since they are the main drivers of Social Justice, too bad...


29 posted on 05/11/2016 3:34:56 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

What the hell is the big deal with unisex bathrooms? They have been around since the Porta-Potties hit the sceen. People use them every day. Get over it stupid people. How many have you ever seen that a “multiple user”?


30 posted on 05/11/2016 5:22:45 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat
I can't think of a single instance where deviating from old "rigid norms" hasn't evolved into absurd rulings. Whenever a judge says it is absurd that their pet ruling won't eventually result in some defined absurdity, it is prudent to assume that the absurdity is a near certain eventuality. Some other judge will insist on it, and they will circle the wagons and defend the absurdity.

In short, the courts are transparently inconsistent and arbitrary. Their claim to legitimacy based on logic and "rule of law" is worthless.

31 posted on 05/11/2016 5:28:00 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
-- In other words, if 14A's EPC was intended to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex as activist justices have now argued concerning gay "marriage" for example, then there would have been no need for the EPA imo. --

Just shows that there is more than one way to skin a cat, and that courts will use whatever widget they find as the means to justify the desired outcome. Courts are outcome driven, not law driven.

32 posted on 05/11/2016 5:30:07 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
… no need for the EPA ERA that is.

Not much need for that one either

33 posted on 05/11/2016 5:57:56 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: grania

I don’t disagree with you at all. I don’t want to use a locker room or bathroom with a guy.

However - men dressed as women have been using the bathrooms for years. I’ve never heard of any problems. Maybe there have been some but not publicized.

I am sure that most women have shared a public bathroom with one of these guys. They probably didn’t know it. It’s not been a problem until the liberals and sex offenders decided to push the envelope.


34 posted on 05/11/2016 6:55:50 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

I’m betting that there are single stall bathrooms at Trump’s properties.


35 posted on 05/11/2016 7:01:47 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Single stall bathrooms are the solution.

OK for a small venue, but prohibitively costly for anywhere mass gatherings are frequent and many facilities are needed.

36 posted on 05/11/2016 7:19:45 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I agree, it wasn’t a problem because the transgenders didn’t make it one. The liberal maniacs create a problem and then demand their solution. With the way this has been publicized, there is NO WAY that it won’t be exploited.


37 posted on 05/11/2016 7:19:45 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

It’s not like everyone has to go to the bathroom at the same time. And if there’s a line....well then, they can just stare at each other.


38 posted on 05/11/2016 7:23:24 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bogie

“Just a joke about the beatnik poet and the stupid situation at hand.”

Sorry-—it was past my bedtime and my sense of humor gene was sound asleep.

.


39 posted on 05/11/2016 9:04:38 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I have no idea.


40 posted on 05/11/2016 9:23:02 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Giggles the pig for POTUS - 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson