Skip to comments.
Roger Stone: Trump Should Pick Military VP
newsmax.com ^
| 03 May 2016
Posted on 05/09/2016 3:05:30 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Donald Trump can beat Hillary Clinton in November if he selects a running mate with a strong military background because of her support for the disastrous Iraq War, Trump supporter Roger Stone told Newsmax TV on Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; 2016veep; military; rogerstone; stone; trump; trumpdod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: Helicondelta
2
posted on
05/09/2016 3:10:36 PM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
3
posted on
05/09/2016 3:11:31 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Biggirl
4
posted on
05/09/2016 3:14:22 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
To: Fantasywriter
Exactly the first name that popped into my brain.
To: Biggirl
6
posted on
05/09/2016 3:14:28 PM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Helicondelta
how dare you post that “tone” of communication to all the “no bad language” conservatives???
Gotta love this guy you posted quotes from. Relative of Patton? or MacArthur? or just your run of the Mill, retired Marine General.
7
posted on
05/09/2016 3:15:35 PM PDT
by
MIA_eccl1212
(10 rounds 10 meters 10 seconds 10 centimetres)
To: Helicondelta
Duncan Hunter Jr. if you want to go military, and still have someone who knows what’s really going on in Paul Ryan’s house.
8
posted on
05/09/2016 3:16:01 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(The definition of being a Republican is supporting its nominee. I am not a Republican. Ryan is.)
To: Helicondelta
Ernst, but West works for me too.
9
posted on
05/09/2016 3:16:01 PM PDT
by
TwelveOfTwenty
(See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
To: Fantasywriter
Allen West.
West would be an interesting choice. Maybe Mattis for SECDEF.
To: Helicondelta
Would picking General Petreaus be the ultimate trolling of Hillary?
I don’t know. I’m asking.
11
posted on
05/09/2016 3:17:38 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(Oil: natural, organic, and gluten free)
To: Helicondelta; jazusamo; RedRover; Girlene; smoothsailing; 4woodenboats
After Haditha, I wouldn’t recommend Mattis for anything more than a state legislator’s job. He is not presidential material.
He was caught engaging in illegal command influence trying to railroad the Haditha Marines falsely prosecuted for protecting their lives in Haditha, Iraq.
He should NEVER be anywhere near a heartbeat from the presidency.
IF you want a warrior general, then look elsewhere.
12
posted on
05/09/2016 3:17:51 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: georgiegirl
Wouldn’t West be great? He’s positively fearless, not to mention eloquent and razor-sharp. His conservative credentials are second to none, and he’s got the military box checked with room to spare. If Trump listened to me I’d beg him to choose West. As it is, I can only hope.
13
posted on
05/09/2016 3:18:25 PM PDT
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Helicondelta
No offense to Allen West but I would prefer a very high ranking military person with lots of connections inside our military. Also with a very high IQ and a brilliant strategic mind.
14
posted on
05/09/2016 3:18:34 PM PDT
by
McCarthysGhost
(We need to repeal and replace the Republican Party)
To: McCarthysGhost
Also with a very high IQ and a brilliant strategic mind.That would be Cruz
15
posted on
05/09/2016 3:22:46 PM PDT
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: NeoCaveman
Petraeus would be a good one!
16
posted on
05/09/2016 3:24:21 PM PDT
by
aynrandfreak
(Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
To: Helicondelta
To: Helicondelta
Recent generations aren't that familiar with generals. It's not like it was back in the 1940s. Plus, military brass won't have much patience with the kind of massaging of voters that candidates have to do (admittedly, some generals do too much of that sort of thing -- being ingratiating with people they need to impress -- but those who hit the right balance of independence and persuasiveness are hard to find).
Unconventional candidates haven't had much luck with military running mates: Wallace-LeMay 1968, Perot-Stockdale 1992.
18
posted on
05/09/2016 3:25:28 PM PDT
by
x
To: Helicondelta
If people in this country do not get wise and cool their jets. He will be made POTUS.
19
posted on
05/09/2016 3:26:12 PM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: Fantasywriter
20
posted on
05/09/2016 3:27:31 PM PDT
by
AdaGray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
