Posted on 05/06/2016 7:02:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Maybe Sean Hannity can get these kids together again, eh? Donald Trump told Fox and Friends this morning that he and Paul Ryan will meet next week to discuss party unity and Ryan’s trepidation in supporting him. First, though, Trump tweaked Ryan for not getting behind the presumptive nominee, and that “he was the only one that was surprising.” Noting that Ryan and Mitt Romney lost a winnable race in 2012, Trump wondered why Ryan doesn’t grasp the need for unity now (via Twitchy):
"I was really surprised by it…he talks about unity, but what is this about unity?" @realDonaldTrump on Paul Ryanhttps://t.co/iLwc2aFdUG
— FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) May 6, 2016
Meanwhile, it appears that someone has gotten these two kids together, or will soon. Trump tells the F&F panel that he and Ryan will meet on Wednesday to discuss the distance between them, and presumably how to close ranks and present a united Republican front:
.@realDonaldTrump says he will meet with Paul Ryan next week, possibly Wednesday.https://t.co/WvEADRKi0M
— FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) May 6, 2016
Ryan’s reluctance — his #TrumpSkeptical position, if you will — seems a bit curious at this stage. Chris Cillizza wonders whether Ryan’s trying to shield the GOP from so-called “Trumpism”:
Lost somewhat in the maelstrom of press coverage of Ryan’s announcement — it came during an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper — was the “why” behind Ryan’s decision to not simply get in line behind Trump.
The answer is important and telling about where Ryan sees both himself and the party not just in this election but in 2020 and beyond. He is not running for president. Instead he’s working like hell to preserve a Republican Party that can be viable in future national elections. …
Seen through that lens, Ryan’s unwillingness to simply throw his support behind Trump makes perfect sense. Ryan knows the numbers. He gets that Trump is an underdog against Hillary Clinton in the fall. And what he wants to avoid is sacrificing (or appearing to be sacrificing) the core principles of the Republican Party for the easy expediency of backing the party’s nominee.
There’s not really anything preventing from Ryan from offering a public statement of party loyalty while continuing to work to advance those principles. Ryan doesn’t have to campaign for Trump or to extol him; all he needed to say was, “The voters have elected our nominee, and I will support our party in November.” Most of the endorsements Trump cites in the clips above have been of that nature, focusing more on beating Hillary Clinton than on the virtues of Trump himself. As a member of party leadership — which the Speaker is ex officio — this reluctance could come across as sour grapes after the party’s own primaries and caucuses.
Going #NeverTrump won’t “preserve a Republican Party that can be viable in future national elections”; it will create all sorts of grudges and divisions that will complicate matters in 2020 and beyond (and probably in 2018 as well). That problem comes from a disconnect from voters profound enough that the GOP’s loyal voters chose Trump over the more reliable expression of those core principles. As I wrote yesterday at The Fiscal Times, the solution to that won’t come from a refusal to recognize that feedback, but from long, patient work to make the kind of connections to communities that addresses it:
People in swing counties see Republicans, and especially the conservative factions within it, as the party of no, not the party of solutions. Opposition parties and movements have to say no, but to succeed they have to find ways to get voters to say yes as well.
Fortunately, conservatism is not destined for irrelevance. Some conservative organizations – Americans for Prosperity chief among them – have eschewed electoral politics and philosophical rhetoric in favor of community engagement. They make themselves part of their communities, offer real assistance to people while contextualizing free-market economics as the solution for the lives of those who live there.
An explosion of regulatory activity at the federal level now has Washington encroaching on the businesses and lives of more Americans than ever, the cost for which the Competitive Enterprise Institute estimates as $15,000 a year for every US household. That gives even greater opportunities for small-government conservatives to offer specific solutions that will improve the lives of people in a direct and concrete manner.
Conservatism has to be more than a debating society. It has to offer practical improvements, and in order to do that it has to engage people where they live. For too long, the conservative movement has mainly argued philosophy and employed obstructionism while assuming the rest of country understood the stakes. As this primary has demonstrated, even many self-identified conservatives have tired of ideology and all-or-nothing politics.
Most of the present contretemps between Trump and his doubters/opponents comes from voices urging an immediate demand for loyalty to the nominee. The convention is more than two months away; perhaps everyone can take a deep breath and allow others to come to terms with reality at their own pace. Roger Simon urges everyone to do just that, including the #NeverTrump contingent:
When I read this afternoon that Speaker of the House Paul Ryan announced (on CNN!) his reluctance to support Donald Trump, his party’s assumed presidential nominee, I knew it was time for the Republicans to take a time out, to shut up for, say, a week and let things cool off. Furthermore, hard as it may be, they should not for that period give any press interviews and they should refrain from making any public pronouncements. (Ryan, generally a smart guy, was absolutely a sucker for Jake Tapper.)
And that includes Mr. Trump, who won the primary election far more quickly than even he thought he would. He needs to take a breather to figure things out. Anybody would.
Naturally the #NeverTrump crowd needs to go silent for a few days as well.
All branches should stop and think, not do anything definitive. It won’t hurt. They can come out and be just as mean to each other in another week, destroy the party, start a third party, move to Canada, invade the Balkans, whatever they want to do. But maybe they won’t. Maybe they have more in common than they think. They should at least try to find out.
It’s good advice, and perhaps the strident voices on both sides should listen to it.
Ryan was not promoted.
Ryan is the Unelected Speaker of the House.
The disgraced former Speaker eg Boehner appoints the new leader to be shamed by the people.
The shamed Ryan then appoints a new shamed leader.
House real elections are cancelled and outgoing shamed leader appoints next leader.
Speaker of House is Unelected position.
Shamed leader cancels election and appoints future shamed leader.
You can’t get through to brilliant. He never does his homework and acts like a liberal, he ignores facts.
Most of the present contretemps between Trump and his doubters/opponents comes from voices urging an immediate demand for loyalty to the nominee.
Those voices are the press, trying with all its might to create a fire storm.
Thanks for the clue! Are you saying he/she might be less than brilliant??
At heart, he is a businessman and burning bridges is not a best practice, unless absolutely necessary.
Well Trump himself says that he’s trying to get Ryan on board. My point is just that he’s doing it in a very awkward way. On one hand he slaps him down. On the other he says he’s going to get him on board.
I don't do links, but you can copy/paste:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/06/paul-nehlen-paul-ryans-elitism-is-showing-his-disdain-and-disrespect-for-the-american-electorate-is-breathtaking/
It’s called “Art of the Deal” and if anyone knows it better, it’s Trump, he wrote the book, and built his 10 Billion dollar company on it...
If anyone can turn this Country around, it’s Trump...
Yup.
Paul Ryan is a pure and unasulterated Jerk , so Self Absorbed with himslf he should be Committed.
1). Paul Ryan is not displaying leadership (your definition)
Trump is the nominee, and it’s his job to get people like Ryan on board. Trump needs the support of everyone he defeated and those, like Ryan, who might disagree with some of his positions to defeat Hillary in the general election.
2). Donald Trump will display leadership when he explains to Paul Ryan the Trump plan!
Yes, that’s my point. His initiative to reach out to Ryan is a move in the right direction.
Thanks for your thoughts, I don’t think Trump will coalesce to the GOPe on any of his major platform issues.....
Get on board and play nice or I’ll endorse Nehlen and throw him a huge rally. Your choice. Have a nice day.
Unification depends on having compatible world views. Right now, the GOPe and DEMs are approximately unified, see "uniparty."
Something has to give if nationalism is to take root, and the GOP is where that fracture is. Sometimes "unification" comes about by removing certain factions from your club. The GOPe is trying to remove Trump, but it has to do so delicately, in a way that allows plausible deniability. And at the same time, Trump is trying to remove or expose the globalists, and has to be careful about it.
The flexibility will be in how much time he has to decide.
No. He’s there because the Establishment wanted someone they could control in there. A real Establishment apparatchik. So, Paul Ryan it is.
The republican gone is dead and if they think Trump loses and they can go back to TPP and open borders..well they could not be more wrong
What a bunch of losers
**Donald Trump says he will meet with Paul Ryan next week, possibly**
The negotiator strikes again!
He should just say, “Look, I don’t even know if I’ll be working with Paul Ryan,” and let them interpret it how they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.