Skip to comments.FBI interviews Clinton aides including Huma Abedin as part of email probe
Posted on 05/05/2016 3:41:22 PM PDT by simpson96
(CNN)Some of Hillary Clinton's closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven't found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.
In recent weeks, multiple aides have been interviewed -- some more than once, the officials said. A date for an FBI interview of Clinton has not been set, these officials said, but is expected in the coming weeks. Abedin has cooperated with the probe, the officials said. Lawyers for Abedin declined to comment.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
...tick, tick, tick...
They’ve had months to coordinate their stories. Months.
Read the CNN article, it is an exercise in excuses.
Time to quit interviewing and actually do something.
“Did not willfully violate” has no meaning under the law. A violation can be either willful or not. It’s still a violation.
Someone’s in the tank for Hillary. Spin!
Arrest and convict every damn one of them,
But if those stories conflict with forensic evidence that was recovered from the server...Whoops!
That won’t happen. The Clinton crime family has people on the inside of the investigation. Count on it. Hillary and her myrmidons have already been tipped off to anything which could incriminate.
Yep, and it would add fuel to a charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Yeah, “willfully violated”? Really? Since when does it have to be willful? How about RECKLESS or, at the very least, negligent and careless. SHE decided to have her own server, that is a very deliberate decision. SHE mixed secure/non-secure data. SHE didn’t secure the server. SHE put people’s lives at risk.
This is coming from “U.S. officials” who were briefed on it.
That means Democrats are acknowledging that Huma has been questioned.
Everything else is conjecture and second-hand.
This isn’t from the FBI or the Justice Department.
This is an attempt to soften the blow for the Democrat voters.
The law in question has a clause for “gross negligence”.
And, there are emails in which Hillary explicitly instructed an aide to move a message from a secure system and remove the markings
The DOJ does not have the integrity to indict Hillary. But maybe some of her aides will go down, and that could be bad for Hillary’s campaign as well, assuming it happens before the election.
Get them on record under oath...Pagliano knows where all the bodies are buried...
“FBI probe into the security of her private email”
Spellcheck is so weird, it changed “criminal investigation” into “probe into the security”.
Paul Shanklin...Try to remember the ...
“I’m sorry, I can’t remember”
At this point it's just another way for the media to sell copy. These stories sell... even though everyone knows nothing will ever come of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.