Posted on 04/30/2016 5:27:02 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Need English Translation:
Partido Republicano afronta “hora de la verdad” con posible candidatura de Trump NACIONAL - 29 ABRIL 2016 Se acerca cada vez más el momento en que el Partido Republicano tendrá que aceptar a Trump como su candidato a la Presidencia
Manifestantes obligan a Trump a entrar por la puerta trasera de su evento en California DE LA BAHÍA - 29 ABRIL 2016 “Sentí que estaba cruzando la frontera”, dijo Trump ante una audiencia conformada por miembros del partido republicano en California
Visita de Trump a Costa Mesa genera masivas demostraciones de simpatizantes y opositores NACIONAL - 28 ABRIL 2016 Discusiones acaloradas marcan la visita del magnate republicano al sur de California
No es fácil ser un latino republicano en California NACIONAL - 28 ABRIL 2016 Son cada vez menos y los que hay, o han dejado el partido, o están inconformes con las opciones. Algunos fieles a Trump encuentran las (...
Google Translate
It is talking about his speech at the California Republican thingamabob yesterday
Thanks.
If you go to their website, those are actually all separate headlines over the past day or so.
I was trying to see if La Raza was inciting protests or riots from their election coverage page.
Hmmmm, they left a corrupt government...to force us into a corrupt government like theirs.
Of course, given our liberals, we were pretty far along the corrupt path already.
This will lead to violence.
Period.
The purpose is to facilitate "evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons." The law is administered by the FARA Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security Division (NSD) of the United States Department of Justice.[1] As of 2007 the Justice Department reported there were approximately 1,700 lobbyists representing more than 100 countries before Congress, the White House and the federal government.[2]
==============================================
History of the Act----- The Act originally was administered by the Department of State until transferred to the Department of Justice in 1942.[3] From passage in 1938 until 1966 when the Act was amended, enforcement focused on propagandists for foreign powers, even if it was not "for or on behalf of" those powers. It was used in 23 criminal cases during World War II. For cases not warranting prosecution, the Department of Justice sent letters advising prospective agents of the law.[3][4]
In 1966 the Act was amended and narrowed to emphasize agents actually working with foreign powers who sought economic or political advantage by influencing governmental decision-making. The amendments shifted the focus of the law from propaganda to political lobbying and narrowed the meaning of "foreign agent".[5] From that moment on, an organization (or person) could only be placed in the FARA database if the government proved that it (or he or she) was acting "at the order, request, or under the direction or control, of a foreign principal" and proved that it (or he or she) was engaged "in political activities for or in the interests of such foreign principal," including by "represent[ing] the interests of such foreign principal before any agency or official of the Government of the United States."[6]
This increased the government's burden of proof; since 1966 there have been no successful criminal prosecutions under the FARA act.[5] However, a civil injunctive remedy also was added to allow the Department of Justice to warn individuals and entities of possible violations of the Act, ensuring more voluntary compliance but also making it clear when the law has been violated. This has resulted in a number of successful civil cases and administrative resolutions since that time.[3]
(RIPE FOR CHANGE)
In 1995, the term "political propaganda" was removed from Subsection 611 following the 1987 Supreme Court case, Meese v. Keene, in which a California State Senator wanted to distribute three films from Canada about acid rain and nuclear war, but felt his reputation would be harmed if he distributed films that had been classified officially as "political propaganda".[4][7] The Court backed up an earlier lower court ruling in favor of one of the film's distributors in Block v. Meese.[8] The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA), 2 U.S.C. § 1601, removed from the Act certain agents engaged in lobbying activities who register under that Act, which is administered by Congress.[9]
In 2004 the Justice Department stated that the Foreign Agent Registration Unit's database for tracking foreign lobbyists was in disrepair.[10] However, in 2007 The Justice Department launched an online database which can be used by the public to search filings and current reports.[2]
================================
Scope of the Act------ The Act requires periodic disclosure of all activities and finances by people and organizations that are under foreign control ("agents") of a foreign government, of organizations or of persons outside of the United States ("foreign principal"), if they act "at the order, request, or under the direction or control" of this principal or of persons who are "controlled or subsidized in major part" by this principal.[6]
Organizations under such foreign control can include political agents, public relations counsel, publicity agents, information-service employees, political consultants, fundraisers or those who represent the foreign power before any agency or official of the United States government.[6]
SNIP---more at WIKI
I suppose that our philosophy is that of the Chinese who practice passive resistance. To wit: If you wish to strike me, go ahead. Soon your arm will grow tired and you will not wish to strike me.
They have plenty of flag poles. We have plenty of heads. The only remaining question to be answered is, will we run out of heads before they run out of flagpoles, or will they run out of flagpoles before we run out of heads to smash.
One thing that you can take to the bank is that as long as we keep taking it, they will continue to dish it out.
The way a great nation falls is to flood the polls with outside agitators. It is a numbers game and they must be repelled or it will not end well.
La Raza’s Growing Influence: Gaining clout and tax dollars in all branches of government FEBRUARY 23, 2015
Finances and Organizational Structure
The National Council of La Raza, which has about 165 employees, is extremely well off, according to data provided in its 2013 annual report. The group, a 501(c)(3) “public charity,” disclosed net assets of $109,269,832 as of Sept. 30, 2013. It reported total expenses of $44,589,483.
NCLR also maintains at least one separate related nonprofit entity, the Strategic Investment Fund for La Raza Inc. It is also a 501(c)(3) and serves essentially as La Raza’s piggybank, reporting $31,944,200 of “funds held in trust” for its parent group at Sept. 30, 2013. Its purpose, according to its IRS filings, is “to support the charitable and educational activities of National Council of La Raza, to engage in any and all activities necessary or appropriate to raise funds for the purposes of the organization.…”
National Council of La Raza receives tremendous support from the usual suspects in left-wing philanthropy. Major donors include Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ($29,367,869 since 2003); Ford Foundation ($18,745,600 since 1999); Neighborhood Reinvestment Corp. ($9,098,857 since 2008); W.K. Kellogg Foundation ($7,838,113 since 2002); Charles Stewart Mott Foundation ($6,076,000 since 1999); John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($4,920,000 since 1999); George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society ($2,562,500 since 2009) and Open Society Institute ($2,487,331 since 1999); and Carnegie Corp. of New York ($1,425,081 since 2002). It has also enjoyed $5,472,379 in support from the Walton Family Foundation since 2001.
La Raza receives considerable support from corporate philanthropies as well. Among them are Pepsico Foundation ($12,021,107 since 2001); Bank of America Charitable Foundation ($8,416,200 since 2004); UPS Foundation ($6,587,296 since 2004); Walmart Foundation ($3,700,000 since 2010); Verizon Foundation ($2,925,000 since 2001); General Motors Foundation ($2,240,000 since 2004); Comcast Foundation ($1,845,000 since 2007); Citi Foundation ($900,000 since 2001); and Wells Fargo Foundation ($750,000 since 2011). These funds come from corporate foundations that are legally separate from the businesses themselves. No doubt considerable sums are given, without any required disclosure, directly from major corporations.
National Council of La Raza
**************************
They never translate the entire title.
National Council of The Race
Blatantly racist organization should always be identified with full English translation
It’s in some European language.
And they all get a tax write off to support racism...ain’t America great
Exactly.
An uninformed freeper tried to equate La Raza with the KKK.
The KKK gets no funding from fedGov or wealthy elites; small group w no power.
La Raza has had their funding tripled by the current WH; big numbers + growing power.
MAMA = Make America Mexico Again. That’s all you need to know
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.