Skip to comments.
Hickenlooper: Switch To Primaries Would Be A 'Worthy Expense' [Colorado]
Colorado Public Radio ^
| April 20, 2016
| Rachel Estabrook
Posted on 04/20/2016 7:21:15 PM PDT by snarkpup
Colorado would go back to holding a presidential primary under a bill that's expected to be introduced this week, after Democrat and Republican voters complained that caucuses, held in March, left them out of the nominating process.
The idea has Gov. John Hickenlooper's support, even though it might mean the state picks up the cost.
(Excerpt) Read more at cpr.org ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: caucus; co2016; convention; delegate
Secretary of State Wayne Williams estimates the cost at $5 million. I called his elections department and confirmed that this would be the price for a
standalone primary. If it is combined with the existing primary (for county commissioner, legislators, etc.) it would presumably cost very little, since it would just be a few more lines on an existing ballot. Some state legislation would be required to get the dates to line up.
If one adds up the direct and indirect costs of the current disaster, $5 million sounds cheap by comparison, anyway.
1
posted on
04/20/2016 7:21:15 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
To: snarkpup
If one adds up the direct and indirect costs of the current disaster, It sure does look like the "current disaster" was a windfall for Trump! And if it helps CO modernize its presidential primary process, so much the better.
2
posted on
04/20/2016 7:30:45 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: snarkpup
So what. Other states are able to perform their duties. You guys disrespect the people of your states. Primaries should be required for all states including Iowa. 1 a week for 50 weeks to give each state some love from the candidates. The dang thing lasts a year anyway.
3
posted on
04/20/2016 7:37:12 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: snarkpup
“Secretary of State Wayne Williams estimates the cost at $5 million.”
They collect that in less than a week, thanks to their Reefer Madness there.
4
posted on
04/20/2016 7:40:05 PM PDT
by
BobL
(A vote for Cruz...is now a vote for Romney / Jeb / Linda / Ryan (at the convention))
To: napscoordinator
Other states are able to perform their duties.One quick fix to the mess would be to simply look to one of the other states whose system has not created a national scandal and do whatever they're doing.
5
posted on
04/20/2016 7:40:49 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
(I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
To: snarkpup
The idea has Gov. John Hickenlooper's support, even though it might mean the state picks up the cost. With all the things government at all levels wastes money on, any office holder whining about the cost of an election to allow the citizens to vote should be removed from office and horsewhipped in the public square.
6
posted on
04/20/2016 7:42:01 PM PDT
by
Will88
To: snarkpup
True. And there are many to chose from. In fact, most states take their task seriously. It is the weird mountain states mostly that are disrespectful to their citizens.
7
posted on
04/20/2016 7:44:14 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: snarkpup
Colorado would go back to holding a presidential primary under a bill that's expected to be introduced this week, after Democrat and Republican voters complained that caucuses, held in March, left them out of the nominating process. The idea has Gov. John Hickenlooper's support, even though it might mean the state picks up the cost.Th last Colorado bill stopped in May of 2015 by the Republicans in committee was for an Open Primary.
Remember the days when we wanted our primaries closed?
8
posted on
04/20/2016 7:57:32 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
To: snarkpup
Colorado Dems and GOP want the Presidential Primary stand alone, so that other offices seekers can use the much more affordable Caucus system.
Otherwise, it will always be the monied interests seeking office.
9
posted on
04/20/2016 8:02:26 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
To: FreeReign
The existing (non-presidential) primaries are technically closed; but since you can change affiliation just before the primary, and since doing so only takes a couple of minutes at the Secretary of State's website, they are practically open, anyway.
10
posted on
04/20/2016 8:04:42 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
(I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
To: snarkpup
I couldn’t vote in here in Colorado for Trump.
My party disenfranchised me and awarded all the delegates to Cruz.
So much for heeding the voice of the Little People.
The caucus system is corrupt.
11
posted on
04/20/2016 8:15:13 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Will88
Well a little research would result in the very reason Colorado is a caucus system now is because the state told the republican party a stand alone primary would cost the state 5-6 million and the party would have to pay it because the state would not anymore.
This happened just a few years ago and I think it is funny now how the state is willing to pay for it.
12
posted on
04/20/2016 8:54:50 PM PDT
by
biff
To: snarkpup
**Hickenlooper: Switch To Primaries Would Be A ‘Worthy Expense’ [Colorado]**
Yes!
13
posted on
04/20/2016 8:56:14 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: biff
This happened just a few years ago and I think it is funny now how the state is willing to pay for it.Torches, pitchforks and the state becoming an international laughing stock may have had something to do with the change of attitude.
14
posted on
04/20/2016 8:58:59 PM PDT
by
snarkpup
(I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
To: snarkpup
It’s Hickenlooper, he’d just rig the primaries to give the results he wants. He just admits that the GOP-e were retarded for being as blatant about stealing votes as they were.
15
posted on
04/20/2016 8:59:24 PM PDT
by
Objective Scrutator
(All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
To: snarkpup
I thought Cruz and his bots said all was fine in Colorado and that it was only Trump whining...oh well, just another delusional lie by Cruz and his cult.
16
posted on
04/21/2016 3:58:36 AM PDT
by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: snarkpup
17
posted on
04/21/2016 4:00:30 AM PDT
by
exit82
(Road Runner sez:" Let's Make America Meeping Great Again! Meep! Meep!")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson