Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When a Porn Company Tries to Take the High Moral Ground
Townhall.com ^ | April 15, 2016 | Michael Brown

Posted on 04/15/2016 11:42:24 AM PDT by Kaslin

A major porn website has announced that it is blocking North Carolina users in protest of HB2, the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act.

So, North Carolina decides to keep its bathrooms and locker rooms safe from sexual predators and a porn company gets morally indignant.

Oh, the irony. (For the bathroom side of the bill, see my questions to Bruce Springsteen; for the religious protections side, see the points made by Ryan Anderson; for Gov. McCrory’s partial compromise, while standing strong on other key points, see here.)

An internet porn company, by definition, is not only immoral but literally traffics in immorality, and every dime it makes is immoral.

It degrades and exploits women (and men), marks them for lifelong shame, takes advantage of older teens and young ladies wanting to make easy money, turns sex into a filthy business, contributes to the destruction of marriages, leads to harmful addictions, and even pollutes innocent children, who are being exposed to internet porn at younger and younger ages.

Some pornography goes even farther in terms of its destructive activities and effects.

So, if there is “dirty money” being made anywhere, it is being made by the pornography industry, which is anything but a victimless business.

Yet a porn company is so upset with the North Carolina government that it will not do business with customers living in that state.

As a current North Carolina resident I say, “Thank you!”

Perhaps a few less men, women, and children will be taken captive in your snares.

Of course, these days, porn websites are ubiquitous. But perhaps, just perhaps, a North Carolina resident who was going to this website and gets blocked will feel a pang of conscience. Perhaps it will be a struggling Christian who will take this as a sign from the Lord to stop and get help. Let it be!

And perhaps this porn company could start a trend so that other porn companies would also boycott North Carolina.

What a delightful thought!

As for the moral absurdity of a porn company boycotting North Carolina’s bill, that would be like the Mafia boycotting a company because it intimidated its workers.

Or bartenders boycotting a car service because its drivers drank while on the job.

Or strippers boycotting a clothing store because its blouses were immodest.

Or prostitutes boycotting customers because they weren’t respectful to women.

The big difference here is that the porn company is boycotting North Carolina for doing what’s right rather than what’s wrong.

As I said before, oh, the irony.

Not to be outdone, actress Sharon Stone, who became famous for playing a psychopathic, bisexual, icepick murderer in a sexually explicit film, has decided to boycott Mississippi because of that state’s religious freedoms bill.

And then there’s Ringo Starr, who toured Russia with his all-star band in 1998 but will not perform in North Carolina this June, Russia, of course, being famous for its gay-friendly, trans-embracing policies, a bastion of “equality”!

Which reminds me of PayPal’s hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of other major companies threatening North Carolina and Mississippi and other states which are standing for public safety and religious freedom.

Did I say “oh, the irony”?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; gaykkk; h1b; hb2; homosexualagenda; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; northcarolina; obamacare; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: sickoflibs
Some years ago, I read that ICANN actually proposed an .xxx domain for the exclusive use of porn sites. Easy to remember, easy to find and easy to block for those filters which wanted to keep them out.

The industry would have none of it because they liked sneaking through filters. I seriously think that a large swath of their business comes from minors and the unsuspecting.

21 posted on 04/15/2016 1:30:24 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Maybe Grindr will block app users in NC too. Won’t that drive them crazy.


22 posted on 04/15/2016 2:19:03 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: henkster

In Heinlein’s “Friday”, America has balkanized and broken up into several separate countries. The Country of California only allowed unisex bathrooms. The movie version of his Starship Troopers had the troops showering coed, but I don’t recall that in his novel.


23 posted on 04/15/2016 10:12:43 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; fieldmarshaldj; sickoflibs; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker

Publicity stunt. I bet it will pay off, a lot of gays looking for porn will go there, those in other 49 states at least.


24 posted on 04/15/2016 11:37:41 PM PDT by Impy (Did you know "Hillary" spelled backwards is "Bitch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789; Impy; BillyBoy

Yeah, and the one actress in “Troopers” that should’ve been in the coed shower scene (Denise Richards) wasn’t, and the one with the flapjack boobs (Dina Meyer) was.


25 posted on 04/16/2016 12:05:16 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Well, Denise Richards was not in the Mobile Infantry so couldn’t be in THAT shower scene. There was no real detail about barracks life for the Navy personnel. There was just no excuse for not picking more attractive actresses than Dina Meyer, though. I have to assume the casting auditions did not include relevant aspects.


26 posted on 04/16/2016 7:29:56 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

Well, Denise’s shower could’ve been broken and she had to use theirs... I don’t know what bugged me more about Dina Meyer, the runny eggs t*ts or her Debbie Washerwoman Schultz hairdo. Meh.


27 posted on 04/16/2016 7:37:59 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson