Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s ‘classified’ comments strike nerve
The Hill ^ | 4/11/16 | Julian Hattem

Posted on 04/11/2016 3:00:28 PM PDT by markomalley

President Obama’s latest defense of Hillary Clinton has struck a nerve with both the GOP and government leakers such as Edward Snowden.

The president’s comments — “there’s classified and then there’s classified” — suggested some classified information is more sensitive than other classified information, uniting in scorn critics across the political spectrum.

To advocates for government transparency, the remarks stunk of duplicity by suggesting that federal classification rules are arbitrary and don't apply to the Democratic presidential front-runner. “If only I had known,” tweeted Snowden, the former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor who fled the country in 2013 before leaking reams of classified documents about global surveillance. Snowden is now facing multiple federal charges for his leaks.

“For a lower rank-and-file person, that’s not a defense you can ever use,” said Bradley Moss, a lawyer who handles matters related to classified information.

Conservatives saw new reasons to worry that the administration cannot be trusted to adequately investigate Clinton's exclusive use of a primate email server as secretary of State.

Obama “concede[d]” that Clinton “mishandles classified information” and then “twist[ed] to defend her,” blared the Republican National Committee.

“It leaves you with a sense that he is reaching his thumb toward the scale,” said Ron Hosko, a former high-ranking FBI official. “I think it is, as I said, unnecessary and, from an investigators’ point of view, not at all beneficial.”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest was forced to defend the remark, which he said was a sign of the “disputes in the national security bureaucracy” about how to treat classified information that has been widely discussed in the media.

Obama made the comments in an interview with “Fox News Sunday” in response to a question about Clinton’s “homebrew” setup.

“There’s stuff that is really top-secret, top-secret, and there’s stuff that is being presented to the president or the secretary of State, that you might not want on the transom, or going out over the wire, but is basically stuff that you could get in open source,” Obama said.

The government does have different levels for the sensitivity of classified material, ranging from “confidential” to “top-secret.” But criminal charges for mishandling classified information are largely blind to the distinction.

Obama has often prided himself on leading “the most transparent administration in history,” and in fact the number of new classified documents has declined under his watch.

Yet at the same time, the Obama administration has been pilloried for its poor responsiveness under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), with requests that can take years to fulfill and record levels of agencies withholding documents. Additionally, more leakers have faced charges under the 1917 Espionage Act under this president than all others combined.

Trying to split hairs with Clinton’s setup, his critics say, is hypocritical.

“I can’t make an excuse for someone mishandling a confidential document by saying, ‘Oh it was just confidential,’” said Moss, referring the lowest level of classification. “I’ll get laughed out of the room by security.”

The White House said on Monday that Obama has never asked for or received a classified briefing about the federal investigations concerning Clinton’s machine.

“His knowledge of the case is based on public reporting,” Earnest told reporters.

But if Obama had not been kept abreast of the investigation related to Clinton’s machine, then critics were left wondering why he would seek to characterize the contents of the roughly 2,000 emails now considered classified.

“How does he know?” said Hosko.

“For the president to weigh in on what might be the facts or might be wildly erroneous, I think it does little to help preserve the view of the integrity of the investigation and that it isn’t being politicized,” he added. “His comments certainly influence people.”

According to the State Department, none of the material on Clinton's machine was marked as classified at the time it was sent.

Obama’s distinction about what should and should not be classified will serve as little solace to journalists filing FOIA requests or people charged with mishandling sensitive documents. But they will surely be cited in legal briefings nonetheless, potentially undermining the government’s moral high ground.

Just last Friday, the Navy reportedly brought charges against Lt. Cmdr Edward Lin for handing classified information over to other countries, including potentially China and Taiwan.

“Now does this guy get to pick and choose what’s classified and what’s not classified?” said Morgan Wright, a cybersecurity consultant who has worked with the U.S. government.

“Can you imagine now the legal arguments that people are going to create because of this?”

If nothing else, Obama opened his administration up for jokes at his own expense.

“Anyone have the number for the Attorney General?” Snowden tweeted on Sunday.

“Asking for a friend.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: edwardsnowden; hillarycriminalprobe; obamahillary; obamainterview; obamalawless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2016 3:00:28 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

In other words, he probably treats Top Secret information with the same disdain and disregard as Hil.


2 posted on 04/11/2016 3:01:50 PM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Like “rape-rape”...


3 posted on 04/11/2016 3:02:04 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


4 posted on 04/11/2016 3:06:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

That depends on what your definition of “is” is.


5 posted on 04/11/2016 3:08:34 PM PDT by Purdue77 ("Infringement is only for the little people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Or with BJ Clinton, he wasn’t “alone” with some underling because the fact that she was there meant he couldn’t be “alone”...


6 posted on 04/11/2016 3:12:09 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
But in keeping with republican gutlessness the republicans again promise to do nothing but whine and, when pushed by their democratic party bosses, will promptly assume the standard republican position for anal dry humping by their masters in the dnc.

The gutless old party does, however, promise to continue their scorched earth policies to drive any and all non-gop establishment republicans out of their party using any and all dirty tricks at their disposal.

One person one vote? That is the greatest myth perpetuated in the USA today.
7 posted on 04/11/2016 3:15:15 PM PDT by DonPaulJonesII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Obama is the American Justinian.

From the Justinian code: "What pleases the prince has the force of law."

Obama will do whatever it takes to ensure a Democrat win in November--to preserve Obamacare, the war on cops, and a pro-Iran foreign policy. The public in general doesn't care about the rule of law or the Bill of Rights.

Bob Woodward was on a panel on FNC yesterday minimizing the email scandal and accepting the Obama-Clinton spin on the matter. That's an indication that the media in general will follow suit.

8 posted on 04/11/2016 3:15:28 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Obama is the American Justinian.

From the Justinian code: "What pleases the prince has the force of law."

Obama will do whatever it takes to ensure a Democrat win in November--to preserve Obamacare, the war on cops, and a pro-Iran foreign policy. The public in general doesn't care about the rule of law or the Bill of Rights.

Bob Woodward was on a panel on FNC yesterday minimizing the email scandal and accepting the Obama-Clinton spin on the matter. That's an indication that the media in general will follow suit.

9 posted on 04/11/2016 3:15:28 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
...Clinton's exclusive use of a primate email server...

That's the problem. She had a monkey handling her email.

10 posted on 04/11/2016 3:18:14 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Where is the outrage from Democrat Obama?


11 posted on 04/11/2016 3:20:21 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

But...but - these people just don’t understand. Suppose Trump gets the Republican nomination. If Hillary goes down, then what?


12 posted on 04/11/2016 3:29:04 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
If nothing else, Obama opened his administration up for jokes at his own expense.

Administration nothing, he's been doing that his entire life.

13 posted on 04/11/2016 3:29:18 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

And this turkey 0bama is the CinC of our armed forces, little wonder our world wide allies and adversaries are laughing at him and our nation.


14 posted on 04/11/2016 3:33:45 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What a great defense strategy...

“Your honor. I didn’t intend to run over that child after I had 12 shots of tequila and got behind the wheel of my car.”


15 posted on 04/11/2016 4:08:14 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It amazes me that Wallace didn’t set this up in the context of the Valarie Plame investigation, which Obama was all for, like this ... Mr. President you certainly were for full accountability and transparency when Democrats were investigating the Valarie Plame outing of a CIA agent, we know now that Hillary’s emails contained methods and sources of Human Intelligence and somehow you want to misrepresent that as really not classified....


16 posted on 04/11/2016 4:21:08 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Obama has destroyed the office of the presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Silly you... in Obama Merika... all animals are equal except asses are more equal than elephants... See DOJ, IRS, EPA, etc...


17 posted on 04/11/2016 4:23:24 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Obama has destroyed the office of the presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

“The president’s comments — “there’s classified and then there’s classified”..........

That bastard wouldn’t know a “routine” message from a “Top Secret” message if it had his name on it.


18 posted on 04/11/2016 4:26:34 PM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

One classified is used to nail and destroy their enemies.

The other classified is to let their friends off the hook.

He is totally lying.


19 posted on 04/11/2016 5:43:34 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“According to the State Department, none of the material on Clinton’s machine was marked as classified at the time it was sent.”

I thought it was Hillary that said that, not the State Department.


20 posted on 04/11/2016 5:56:00 PM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson