Posted on 04/11/2016 1:03:32 PM PDT by pabianice
My student debt surrounds me like the construction on the University of Massachusetts campus; no matter how hard I try to avoid it, it shows up everywhere. It keeps me from getting to class on time, it ripped a hole in my backpack and it just puts me in a terrible mood. Like the construction, my student debt affects my every decision: what books I buy for classes versus which ones I can access for free, the amount of hours I work to pay my rent and if I can even continue my education at UMass. You can get rid of the Hasbrouck fence, but student loans are for life.
Lucas Coughlin, another Collegian writer, claimed in his op-ed on Jan. 26, 2016 that college should not be free. I disagree. Higher education is a right. Free higher education would take the burden off students (and non-students) while providing access to good paying jobs and economic advancement to people whose family wealth or personal financial circumstances do not allow them access to college without a life-long debt sentence. The total amount of student debt in the United States surpassed $1.3 trillion in 2015 and the UMass class of 2015 graduated with an average of $28,565 in debt. The burden of student debt makes going into the job market post-college extremely stressful.
The problem with higher education now is that it is becoming less and less accessible due to skyrocketing costs and wage stagnation at the time when more folks need it. Colleges need to be more accessible and turn into a viable option for students instead of something thats immediately out of the question, or is an unattainable goal. Low income students and students of color are less likely to afford the rapid rise in the cost of higher education, and this limits opportunities for a huge number of potential college students.
To clarify, when I talk about free higher education, I mean completely free: four years of tuition-free public higher education as well as access to free food, housing, books and any other cost necessary. Right now, one-third of UMass students currently work on campus, which does not include the residential assistants and peer mentors in Residential Life or off-campus jobs. The total number of students who work at UMass is significantly higher, and many of these students rely on their jobs to stay in school. Even with those jobs, students are still accumulating debt.
If higher education were free, low-income and working class students wouldnt have to chose between working long hours at low-wage jobs to help finance their education, which often distracts from and jeopardizes their education. Many opponents of free higher education argue that students need to work hard and earn their way for a mediocre paying job after graduation and that current college students think were entitled to everything. Last semester, I was working 40 hours a week some labor unpaid and ended up with the worst GPA Ive ever had in my academic career. My student debt is around $45,000 right now, and I dont know how Ill be able to pay that off with an 11-percent interest rate. I am struggling, and many other students are struggling as well. How is that entitlement when were just trying to get by?
Coughlin thinks students can get their higher education degree cheaply in todays society. He suggests students should attend junior colleges for a year or two, or attend a commuter school. But what happens when these students move to universities to complete the remainder of their four-year degrees? What I want to ask Coughlin is if he and his family always considered college as an option? How many hours does he work a week? Does he work for spending money or to pay bills? Has he ever had to decide between paying rent and textbooks? Does he struggle under the weight of loans hell carry for decades after graduation?
Now I ask you, Coughlin, do you understand why higher education should be free? Students across the United States are demanding it and taking direct action for this to become a reality. Higher education needs to be free so students can go to college instead of being funneled into low-wage jobs with little chance for economic mobility. Higher education needs to be free so undocumented folks, who cant even access federal financial aid, can attend college without paying from pocket. Higher education needs to be free so students can finally become learners, and not consumers and products of a privatized system.
Erika Civitarese is a Collegian columnist and can be reached at ecivitarese@umass.edu.
And why isn’t THAT guy living/working in his home country? Maybe because his home country is a sh!thole and he would be having the bejeezus taxed out of him if he was there.
They want free not freedom. They don’t realize they will be enslaved later to pay for it.
This is like a scene from the movie Idiocracy.
Dr. Lexus: Don’t worry scro’! There are plenty of ‘tards out there living really kick ass lives. My first wife was ‘tarded. She’s a pilot now.
Most would be overpaid at that.
I was just going to post the same thing... WTH?
Blasphemy!!
I think everything should be free and I should be able to have as much as I want!! where do I sign up for this utopian splendor?
The problem is the enormous expense. Loan shelters should be in place for college tuition. Limits on tuition amounts, loan interest, etc. These same universities take federal money to enforce sensitivity crap, the can rein in their rates. They can cut out useless, frivolous classes. They can downsize to STEM. They can stop restricting male sports, and charge admittance for crowds - people don’t watch female sports nearly as much.
But the last people on earth who should be asked about fiscal balancing are snowflakes.
You will not be able to pay for today’s engineering programs with anything but a loan. You haven’t kept up with the cost of an undergrad degree in engineering. It starts at $9000 per year just for tuition.
If you try to work while going to school, your grades will go down.
The schools are flooded with foreign students who don’t have to work. So, if you’re trying to work, you will be at a competitive disadvantage to the foreigners.
There are too many of you on this thread with no knowledge of what’s actually happening in our engineering schools and tech companies.
Fortunately, America is still producing a sufficiency of young men who are not 'little snowflakes'. The snowflakes probably wouldn't even make it past the front door of the "Armed Forces Career Center".
Actually, he got it for free, here.
And that is the argument that makes the most sense.
And ham trees should be free. I want a free ham tree in my back yard RIGHT NOW. Don’t bother me with that “ham trees don’t exist” crap. You’re just trying to oppress me and deprive me of ham! I have a right to free ham!!!!
You say that as if all grads are stupid.
The fact is, the majority of the grads are working and steadily paying off the debt. The debt and easy money parts are true, but the snowflake garbage is garbage. You hear only the few who are whining about it.
What I learned in my college economics class is, if anything of value is made to be free it will have to be rationed.
So, if you can pass the wicked entrance requirements you get free college. This is how it works in other countries, but the Dems leave that part out.
“And what is the acceptance rate in his country? In other countries, if you do not have what it takes to achieve (IQ plus evidence of studying hard) you do not get in. “
Many colleges here have no or low entrance requirements; however, they also have high failure rates.
Nothing is more expensive than ‘free’ things
Because his home country couldn't give him gainful employment, so he had to undercut the wage structure in this evil capitalist country by undercutting wages on an H1B program.
When I worked in Japan (1988-2002) as their equivalent as an H1B employee, the companies had to pay us a PREMIUM over the locals as a condition for the visa. Imagine that! Fewer foreign workers but happier ones who didn't resent the natives and, instead, appreciated the opportunity.
Further, I actually raised the wage level on my Japanese counterparts by earning that wage premium, encouraging more of them to go into similar work and forcing me to get better every year so I could justify that premium pay.
Free ham sandwiches for all! And free beer!
But only if, after you graduate and get that great job, your work is free of charge as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.