Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor: Court needs greater diversity, in several ways
Associated Press ^ | Apr 8, 2016 10:07 PM EDT | Jennifer Peltz

Posted on 04/08/2016 7:24:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor says the nation’s highest court needs more diversity in personal background and professional experience. […]

The court’s first Latina justice says she feels there’s “a disadvantage” to having a court made up entirely of Ivy League graduates who are either Catholic or Jewish, several of them from New York. She notes that none specialized in criminal defense outside white-collar settings. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: diversity; liberalagenda; sotomayor; wiselatina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Olog-hai

Want diversity? I say grab a name at random from the phone books of 9 American cities. There is your at random lady! And I think we’d have a pretty good court too.


21 posted on 04/08/2016 7:47:00 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I’m pretty sure she’s pimping for a Caitlin Jenner appointment.


22 posted on 04/08/2016 7:50:02 PM PDT by Border Terrier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She needs to be removed a sap.


23 posted on 04/08/2016 7:54:37 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

They need to have more non Harvard grads.

The need to figure out why Catholics make better SCJs.

And of course, Stare Decisis means you value Justices opinions more that the words of the constitution.

DK


24 posted on 04/08/2016 7:54:41 PM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bgill
It needs only Conservatives. No others need apply.
25 posted on 04/08/2016 7:57:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Unwise Latina got a promotion waaaaay over her head. She could have been head of housekeeping services at the Las Vegas Hilton as the pinnacle of career success. So much more her speed and a service to the nation instead of a lieberal bench occupant with inferior brains.


26 posted on 04/08/2016 7:58:19 PM PDT by tflabo (truth or tyrrany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yeh the court needs three more wise white,black or Hispanic conservatives. :-)


27 posted on 04/08/2016 7:59:24 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I might agree - might - if greater diversity would have one qualification, that is that every new member of court agreed that they are members in order to judge whether any matter that comes before it must be evaluated as to its CONSTITUTIONALITY. By constitutionality I mean the bottom line is the Constitution in its original intent.

If something needs to be changed in the constitution, then do it according to the constitution, which plainly allows for amendments.

I am so sick of fad-driven, trend-driven, ideology-driven reinterpretation of the wording of the constitution that clearly does not mean what the people trying to change the meaning say it means. This is sheer delusion. Words mean something. It is not that difficult to ascertain. If the words don’t please you, find an orderly way to address what you see as a problem. Otherwise it will lead to anarchy. (Which I know is the goal of some.)

Sadly, diversity has come to mean that we as a nation cannot and do not agree on much of anything; and the side that screams and throws frightening enough tantrums wins.


28 posted on 04/08/2016 8:01:02 PM PDT by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A steaming pile from the WIDE Latina.


29 posted on 04/08/2016 8:03:15 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Live Free or Die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That bitch need impeachment.


30 posted on 04/08/2016 8:06:40 PM PDT by WENDLE (I guess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"Diversity" is used by someone who is an atheist, a materialist, a behavioralist.

When I taught Great Books in my 20 years in the high school classroom, I was able to
convey that the world of ideas cuts across all cultures, all time, all races, because ideas
come from the spiritual realm, which knows none of these boundaries.
31 posted on 04/08/2016 8:19:09 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She’s acting as a politician, not a judge. impeach her.


32 posted on 04/08/2016 8:28:27 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: akalinin

I share your dissatisfaction with Kennedy, but consider this: he has been quoted as saying, because he was appointed by a Republican, he will not retire until another Republican can appoint his successor. That might be his greatest achievement.


33 posted on 04/08/2016 8:32:47 PM PDT by kitchen (If you are a luthier please ping me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Sonia: The Supreme Court is not a social program. Even though you stupidly believe that is what it is. Your mentality shows that you have absolutely business being there.


34 posted on 04/08/2016 8:39:27 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Goldie Hawn? Henry Gibson?


35 posted on 04/08/2016 8:41:50 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I agree, let’s make three permanent appointments for SCOTUS to only be occupied by veterans. If they are asked to risk their lives to support and defend the constitution, they sure deserve a seat at the table. (Veterans with law degrees, while I thank them for their service, should be barred from these three positions.)

I’m sure that will give the diversity that other justices crave.


36 posted on 04/08/2016 8:48:46 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A few people with some respect for the Constitution would be nice.....


37 posted on 04/08/2016 8:50:02 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

Catholics are the most populous single religion.


38 posted on 04/08/2016 9:03:22 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
We need more non-lawyers in all branches of government.

Or does Diversity simply mean anything but white male conservative heterosexuals again?

39 posted on 04/08/2016 9:04:56 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Gump Shrimp

Interesting observation.

I think the idea is, on one level, that there isn’t any truth, so we might as well get votes from as many contingents on earth as possible.

But on another level, it’s that it’s pretty easy to lead these shallow followings around by the nose.

Now I didn’t say there was no truth! I’m just saying that’s what the idea seems to be.


40 posted on 04/08/2016 9:06:42 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson