Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: Unborn Children Don't Have Constitutional Rights
weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN

Posted on 04/03/2016 7:35:14 AM PDT by Nachum

On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights.

"The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion.

Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; evil; hillary; rights; slipperyslope; unborn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: haircutter
One of Bill's bimbo's told the media, that Bill informed her that Hillary had several abortions, so she knows first hand what an abortion is..
Yet she birthed Chelsea, as it was the Political thing to do..hum mm, Web Huddle must have thought so too, often wonder what HIS family thinks???

just wondering.

81 posted on 04/03/2016 12:06:41 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights,"

I am sure we will have a retraction. Hillary admitting that it is an unborn person is a major gaffe for her. A person connotes something other than a mass of tissue and should be treated separately from the mother. The Reps should jump on this one,

82 posted on 04/03/2016 12:06:54 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If only her mother had felt the same way.


83 posted on 04/03/2016 1:48:00 PM PDT by jmacusa ("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!''-- Popeye The Sailorman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A REAL pro-life Constitutionalist.


84 posted on 04/03/2016 1:55:15 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; afraidfortherepublic

Our state is inundated these days with her ads, as our Primary is this coming Tuesday.

Her ads are superbly crafted and very engaging...

...and then, she speaks....

Milk curdles. Babies scream. Our elderly stroke out. Animals run for shelter. Birds fall from the sky.

She’s so absolutely, ghoulishly AWFUL. Who on Earth could EVER vote for this Fabian Socialist Harridan? Aarrgghhh!


85 posted on 04/03/2016 3:02:15 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I pray for her redemption, but I would love to be there when she’s judge. My own scares the h@ll out of me.


86 posted on 04/03/2016 3:50:28 PM PDT by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Don’t point it out, just insist that she and everyone else keeps using the correct term acknowledging that theses people they are murdering are in fact people whom 5 Federal employees in black robes robed of their right to life in the name of anther ‘right’ no where mention in the Constitution nor ever before protected by the laws of the State or Congress.

The 9th amendment was violated by the one part of the Government it most applied to. And that is not the first or the last time that same corrupt body of dishonorable men and women violated their oaths and the law by striping us of our rights in the interest of their policy making agenda.


87 posted on 04/03/2016 4:04:44 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well, Dred my Scott and let’s kill babies.


88 posted on 04/03/2016 4:06:01 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

“But illegal aliens and Muslim terrorists have constitutional right according to her.”

Honestly the Federal Constitution applies to the Federal government not the people or their states. There is no such thing as a ‘constitutional’ right except that expressly given to the Federal government in terms of the ability to make law.

When the Federal employees in black robes decide to make their own law. They started inventing a select handful of polices they wanted to push and created individual ‘rights’ which they would elevate above all others as a means to create,abolish, or alter existing law in cadences to whatever their agenda is as they apply it to any given case.

Primarily thou when it comes to their ability to prosecuted Government and State officials do they find their real power, to superseded not only the Constitution’s restrictions upon their power but to directly govern the people by hijacking their other elected agents.

There uses to be a concept called solvergin immunity and the 11th amendment that prevented this hijacking of the legislative and executive branch by the federal employees in black robes. Those restrictions have over the 20th century been cast away. Primarily in the now fascist but formerly simply fanatical crusade against the never ending boggy man of racism.

Until the people unite against the Federal employees in black robes and strip them of their legislative and executive power over the Constitution and all other parts of the Government there can be no justice or freedom in this country.

The lawyers will run everything, as policy makers using judges as enforcers. Just like they been doing with increasing degrees of success over the last 50 years.


89 posted on 04/03/2016 4:14:57 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Unborn Children Don't Have Constitutional Rights

Is the Wicked Witch a descendent of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney?

90 posted on 04/03/2016 6:05:33 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Pre 1970s the unborn had the same constitutional protection as those outside the womb.


91 posted on 04/03/2016 6:28:49 PM PDT by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

as bad as the Donald. Donald Trump’s 3 positions on abortion in 3 hours
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-positions/index.html?sr=twnwsrm033116donald-trump-abortion-positions0159PMVODtopPhoto&linkId=22912617


92 posted on 04/03/2016 8:54:00 PM PDT by GailA (any politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Why Trump is not Pro Life
http://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2016/04/03/why-trump-is-not-prolife-n2142750?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=


93 posted on 04/03/2016 8:57:58 PM PDT by GailA (any politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“This is the other side of Clinton's message: against the ugliness of state control, she wants to raise the banner of morality as well as freedom. Pro-choicers have tried this for 40 years, but they always run into a fatal objection: Abortion is so ugly that nobody who supports it can look moral. To earn real credibility, they'd have to admit it's bad. They often walk up to that line, but they always blink.

Not this time. Abortion is “a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women,” said Clinton. Then she went further: “There is no reason why government cannot do more to educate and inform and provide assistance so that the choice guaranteed under our constitution either does not ever have to be exercised or only in very rare circumstances.”

“Does not ever have to be exercised”. I searched Google and Nexis for parts of that sentence tonight and got no hits. Is the press corps asleep? Hillary Clinton just endorsed a goal I've never heard a pro-choice leader endorse. Not safe, legal, and rare. Safe, legal, and never.

Safe, Legal, and Never: Hillary Clinton's anti-abortion strategy.”
www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2005/01/safe_legal_and_never.single.html

94 posted on 04/04/2016 12:29:51 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; onyx; Hunton Peck; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; JPG; ...

Illegal aliens have constitutional rights, but unborn children don’t, according to Madame Hillary. Doesn’t she remind you of Mme. LeFarge (knitting a special stitch every time a head (IOW a US freedom) rolls off the guillotine?

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


95 posted on 04/04/2016 2:02:56 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

It’s a shame her mother didn’t have the same opinion, but I digress.

Wouldn’t it be great to see a dem candidate get asked during a debate, “if a late term aborted baby survives the abortion, what do you think the actions of the doctor should be?”


96 posted on 04/04/2016 3:56:10 AM PDT by BuckeyeGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

I have always wondered about that dichotomy myself.


97 posted on 04/04/2016 4:19:33 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

OF COURSE women who murder their unborn children should be punished; we punish men who don’t pay child support, don’t we?


98 posted on 04/04/2016 6:38:33 AM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Absolutely correct.
Abortion is not removing cancer or a tumor.
What is it removing?
It’s removing the viability of a child.


99 posted on 04/04/2016 7:37:08 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Trump/Johnson Libertarian Party 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

She calls the unborn child a person rather than a fetus like most abortion supporters do. Yet this unborn person has no rights. Can she even hear herself? Why are there laws that charge a murderer with two murders if a pregnant woman is killed? She is the face of evil.


100 posted on 04/04/2016 7:46:07 AM PDT by austingirl (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson