Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interview with a Candy Wrapper
https://avengersocial.wordpress.com ^ | March 26, 2016 | AvengerSocial

Posted on 03/26/2016 9:30:12 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

It’s not often, I do a story myself. I have a team writers so I don’t have to. This leaves me the freedom to investigate and track leads. But this story is so hot, I felt I should do this one.

If you have been on twitter #cruzsexscandal has been over the top and widely circulated but let’s not forget the anonymous video released that promised if Cruz did not drop out his dirty secrets would come out. I can say this day has come, given the release from the National Enquirer. But Avenger has a leg up on everyone. Our anonymous source found one of the alleged escorts who Ted Cruz frequented. Her picture released in our previous story is not how she looks today. Let’s call her Jane Doe.

We were given the exclusive interview done by the detective that found her. We will not disclose her real identity nor her location, since the initial leak she has gone off the radar. She was found in a West Texas trailer park after a former escort feared that she would too become part of this drama and gave up her location. As promised, both identities are strictly confidential and shall remain anonymous. For now, we are just releasing some parts of this explosive transcript. An excerpt of his interview with our Jane Doe is transcribed below. Be forewarned it’s explosive. While we believe 100% that is true, we’re are advised to refer to the statements below as allegations. I do have the video of this conversation. Our job is to shed light and not to master.

Detective: As agreed during our interview, your identity and location will be kept secret, as sworn and recorded. When, did you first meet Ted Cruz?

Jane Doe: 2004, I was 18 and my regular client in Dallas gave him the contact. It is not unusual for this to happen, many clients for the service I worked with are lobbyist, donors, attorneys and politicians. That is why, I am scared for my life that you found me.

Detective: I will not disclose any location or your true identity, I found you because one of your former clients gave me the information. That led me to one of your associates that brought me here. I did this because if I can find you, others can as well. This interview is only to assure you are who they say you are. Your face will be not shown, nothing will be asked to directly identify you.

Detective: Did Ted Cruz ever tell you he was married? Jane Doe: Some clients do and some do not, he never said anything about being married. He seemed to need mothering of some sort, before we engaged in some of his requested acts.

Detective: Requested acts?

Jane Doe: sometimes I would dress as a catholic school girl for role play, that is popular with many clients though. Other times he would request for me to dress like a judge.

Detective: I see, so would you say he is odd than other clients?

Jane Doe: Who am I to judge my clients? I just do what, I am paid for and go on my way.

Detective: What locations would you meet him?

Jane Doe: Houston/Dallas and I have been to Alexandria as well.

Detective: Virginia?

Jane Doe: Yes

Detective: How many times would he visit you within a week?

Jane Doe: In the beginning, it was every time he had business in either of the locations. He would even pay for my flights to Baltimore then rent a car for me to drive to Alexandria.

Detective: Have you ever seen his wife?

Jane Doe: Yes, many times were close calls. I guess that is why I am terrified how I was found.

Detective: I only found you because of your friend/associate. I think she is about to leave as well.

Jane Doe: After this, I will have to move again. I am leaving Texas and I wished I had never met him. I never experienced this kind of problem as an escort. I knew, when he said he was going to run for president that I would be at risk. As a senator, I was not worried. I have met many politicians doing this service but never had my life been at risk.

Detective: You have my contact so you can reach me if you need help. Let’s get back to talking about Ted more.

Did anyone give you a specific phone at any time for contact?

Jane Doe: Yes, until recently. I was getting weird calls with no way to call it back. The number would be local and I would answer to silence. None of the calls were of the same number, so I threw away the phone. Detective: So, you are saying this is why you feel threatened?

Has he ever called you recently?

Jane Doe: Yes, it is why I feel threatened and No, he has not called since January. This is when all the strange calls started.

At this time, we are deciding to either pass this on to syndicated publication or what are our legal options. We will update once a decision is made.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; cruzmistresscrises; cubanmistresscrises; elections; sexscandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
More on the Cuban Mistress Crisis.
1 posted on 03/26/2016 9:30:12 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Anonymous sources all around.

How credible.


2 posted on 03/26/2016 9:31:08 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“How credible”

It is to trumpsters. They are more than willing to take a rumour and run with it


3 posted on 03/26/2016 9:34:45 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Cruzbots would NEVER do that.


4 posted on 03/26/2016 9:35:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

It has the unflattering oeuvre of Edwards, Cosby, and Bubba wrapped into one.


5 posted on 03/26/2016 9:35:57 AM PDT by StAnDeliver ("Too bad your overhauled unicorn start-up failed, Ted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; All

The interview has the ring of truth to it.

Likewise, the publisher states that there is video of the interview.

But Cruz can blow this all out of the water by making the following statements:

1.) “I have never been unfaithful to my wife Heidi”

2.) “I have never had an affair, or a mistress or mistresses”

3.) “I demand an immediate apology and retraction from the National Enquirer, or I will direct my legal team to being legal proceedings against them.”

That’s all he has to do. But he won’t.

Why?


6 posted on 03/26/2016 9:37:12 AM PDT by mkjessup (JEB, MITT, GLENN even LINDSEY managed to keep their peckers in their pants, what happened with TED?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Interesting Candy Wrapper. /Snickers


7 posted on 03/26/2016 9:37:35 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I wonder if each of these 5 or 8 women knew about the others? If not, they do now and their scorn will be directed at Ted.


8 posted on 03/26/2016 9:37:41 AM PDT by r_barton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

being = begin


9 posted on 03/26/2016 9:38:02 AM PDT by mkjessup (JEB, MITT, GLENN even LINDSEY managed to keep their peckers in their pants, what happened with TED?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

When the hooker dressed like a judge for Ted, was he imagining Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginsburg? ;-)


10 posted on 03/26/2016 9:38:06 AM PDT by r_barton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

“Trumpster” checking in here.

I think this particular “scoop” is a bulls**t creative writing exercise that’s just getting the hashtag applied to drive traffic to a blog. No one speaks they way this “interview” is written in real life.

That being said, the fact that Ted Cruz has not really responded to the National Enquirer at all and instead focused on mentioning Trump’s name a zillion times, makes me think that perhaps where there’s smoke, there is some fire. Guess time will tell. But this blog is not solid evidence of anything.


11 posted on 03/26/2016 9:38:11 AM PDT by 20yearsofinternet (Border: Close it. Illegals: Deport. Muslims: Ban 'em. Economy: Liberate it. PC: Kill it. Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I suspect Cruz has cheated on his wife, but this “interview” sounds like a bunch of baloney intended to confuse the issue.


12 posted on 03/26/2016 9:39:40 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yup. Completely unsubstantiated so it’s all untrue.
Which means an uber smart Harvard Law School grad would realize how easy it would be to sue the NE for libal.
Oh, that’s right. Ted hasn’t.
In fact, he didn’t even blame the source, he attacked Trump.


13 posted on 03/26/2016 9:40:59 AM PDT by sillsfan (Reagan and Sarah are right- WE win, they lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Do you not recall Anthony “Carlos Danger” Wiener and Bill Clinton vehemently DENYING the sex allegations!?

Cruz should lead with sex has been ruled off the table in presidential politics. Ref Clinton v. USA


14 posted on 03/26/2016 9:41:51 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

It’s very reminiscent of the TANG story reported by Dan Rather. Totally unverifiable. And for a good reason. Because it’s fabricated. But the crazies are babbling about it as though it were true.


15 posted on 03/26/2016 9:42:24 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 20yearsofinternet

Strange that the so-called “Constitutional expert lawyer” has not mentioned suing the National Enquirer. Only Trump he wants to badmouth, when this info has been floating around for months on Cruz.


16 posted on 03/26/2016 9:42:56 AM PDT by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sillsfan

What’s “libal?”


17 posted on 03/26/2016 9:42:59 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Anonymous sources all around.

**************

Agree, but sometimes anonymous becomes reality. We’ll see. I’m not sure what
this does for the campaigns as Trump is already leading so what is this doing?


18 posted on 03/26/2016 9:43:49 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gratia

I don’t like Cruz lately but I doubt this “story”. No one in it gives their name. And not too many 18 year old hookers are going to have a costume wardrobe.


19 posted on 03/26/2016 9:43:54 AM PDT by Williams (Dear God, please save us from the Democrats. And the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I’m a major Trump supporter, but I don’t cotton to this kind of innuendo. If there’s actual evidence, then fine, it could be a legitimate issue, but only because Cruz operatives attacked Melania Trump and because Cruz presents himself as wholesome as apple pie and “holier than thou”. Otherwise, I generally could give a rat’s behind about who sleeps with who because don’t necessarily think it’s particularly relevant. After all, Ronald Reagan was MAJOR womanizer even while married to Jane Wyman and to some degree when he was first married to Nancy Davis.

But right now, I’ve seen no EVIDENCE about these putative Cruz peccadilloes, just a bunch of BS innuendo. And I don’t necessarily assume there’s fire just because there’s smoke because the enemedia is REALLY good a blowing smoke up peoples’ behinds.


20 posted on 03/26/2016 9:43:55 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson