Obama has a real dilemma. He is ideologically bound in his hatred of this country to ensure Hillary continues his legacy (on the basis of her promises). But the real problem is that the promises of her, like that two dick billygoat husband of hers are worthless.
If he were truly a prescient zealot hell bent on destroying this country, he would never indict her, because the true measure of a zealot is that success isn’t measured by individual recognition. However, Obama is fundamentally not that sort willing to forego recognition and acclaim for himself for the attainment of the overall goal. The ego must be fed.
What he refuses to recognize is that Hillary would make him the new “Bush Did it” scapegoat in her quest to attain all the power and wealth of the earth’s first Empress.
Hillary will be taken down. JMHO!
He is keeping her contained and managing the consequences at the DOJ. It's his version of pay to play. Getting a few hundred million from her foundation and a no show job for mooch is well worth the wait.
The ego must be fed.
***************
Absolutely right. First and foremost, and above all else, Obama is a pathological narcissist. This obsession of self drives everything he does and says.
Obama has a real dilemma. He is ideologically bound in his hatred of this country to ensure Hillary continues his legacy (on the basis of her promises).I doubt that is true.
That's the real reason for Obama's Argentina visit, to pay a sentimental memorial to the Castros and to Che Guevara.
Clinton is from a competing faction of the Democratic elite. She won't continue his legacy because she does not share his ideology.
Obama (and Valerie Jarrett)'s camp would be happy to throw her under the bus if they do not get too splattered themselves when it happens.
Clinton is a complex self-serving "whatever benefits me and my friends" corrupt liberal politician, IE, a "useful idiot" for the Marxist crowd.
“If he were truly a prescient zealot hell bent on destroying this country,
.....
.......would make him the new “Bush Did it” scapegoat in her quest to attain all the power and wealth of the earth’s first Empress.”
Point taken. But by the same token he’d be the hero of the Muslim world thereby, wouldn’t he? At a religious level. Versus being a scapegoat as you said on a “reputational level”. I don’t think 0bama fears to any great extent a whole segment of American society reviling him. He’d get the devotion of 1.2 billion Muslims to offset that little ego-bruise. Reputation? You mean, they’d take away his SS protection for life, pension, the Hawaii digs he’s destined for and the towering adoration of the leftists he surrounds himself with? I shed no tears for any diminuition in his lifestyle post-pres based on reputation.