Posted on 03/22/2016 10:59:17 AM PDT by xzins
While the big news of the day is obviously the awful terror attack in Belgium, something GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump recently said about the city of Brussels is resurfacing, and I have to admit, its a bit startling.
From Right Wing News:
Bomba attacks terrorized the capital of Belgium this morning, and its become reminder to some of the comments Trump has made about Brussels in the the recent past. Comments labelling Brussels as a jihadist hellhole it is those comments that had him criticized, but look whats happening now
Video at: http://www.youngcons.com/donald-trump-warned-about-condition-of-brussels-before-terrorist-attack/
Go to :48 of the video
Wow.
Yeah its scary how he nailed that one, and whether you think hes competent or not on foreign policy, he obviously knew what he was talking about in regards to Brussels.
What do you think of Trumps comments?
Trump is a vulgarian with little understanding of the facts. Speaking well into the issue after decades supporting the left, he is anything but a Churchill
Well to be fair to Trump, he did specify Brussels.
No reason to bash the guy because he’s insightful and truthful about it. Nobody is saying he’s freakin Nostradamus, but he does seem to get it and doesn’t cower behind political correctness.
>>Cruz already implied it.
Are you serious?? I thought only Progs wrote their own satire.
“Damn right! Churchill was begged to come back, after Chamberlains peace in our times didnt last.”
The big big difference here is that if “Hilda beast” gets elected, we can’t UNDO the damage, and then get Trump.
Yeah, and the dumb shit wants to import more terrorists to kill Americans. Crus is so stupid, he’s dangerous.
Newt is my choice for Trump’s VP or Chief of Staff.
Miss Libby,
You may want to wake up one day wearing a burka, I sure don’t.
The caliphate must not be allowed to conquer our nation.
Only one man has demanded a moratorium on the invasion.
And he is not going to be bought or persuaded to appease the status quo.
He stands unabashed and defiant to declare the truth!
His name is Donald Trump.
IOW, you believe that she may appear more attractive covered in a burqua?
Didnt someone say that Heidi and Ted! live in different towns.
And Ted! has a girl friend or something ?!
Have faith, he can still win.
$5, $10, $20,... what ever you can afford.
YOU need to be banned.
YOU are poison.
Video at: http://www.youngcons.com/donald-trump-warned-about-condition-of-brussels-before-terrorist-attack/
Go to :48 of the video
This should signal the man for the job, but the establishment class will find something stupid to say.
Cruz wants us to send more troops and spend more money on Europe because theyve let themselves be overrun with muslims.
= = = = = = = = = = =
Thanks very much for pinging me, dearest xzins.
You’re right, (as always)! :)
God bless Mr. Donald Trump.
He must win the nomination and then the presidency!
We will vote for him, work for him and of course, continuously pray!
They have a weird sort if government over there. If there’s a vote of ‘no confidence’, they can replace the leader before their term is up. I don’t know that much about it, whether the people or other politicians vote. Kind of like our recalls.
Amen to that.
And yet still stands head and shoulders over Trump.
Which city in the United States? Trump didn’t say Belgium, he said Brussels. Your comparison is not legitimate, unless you predict which city, and even then the U.S. is a much more obvious target than Belgium. Are you honestly telling us that you thought it was as clear as night and day that Brussels specifically would be hit by terrorists, rather than any of the many other European cities with large Muslim populations?
I would hope that GB puts some distance between itself and Europe (Airstrip 1?), but who knows. There are lots of muhamedans in GB, so they’ll likely want closer ties to ‘Eurabia’. In my opinion, in an ‘ideal world’, GB would leave the EU, joining with Canada, Aus, NZ and the US, and would draw closer together. This ain’t no ‘ideal world’, though!
My ‘leader’ is but a pale immitation of the _resident of the United States, both well schooled in socialism, at the knee of their papas (grandpapa in the case of the elder one). Cameron seems not as ‘conservative’ as even Tony Blair, a Labour PM. AFA the AU’s PM, I am not familiar with much of AU’s politics and NZ has traditionally been quite liberal/socialist. (Seems to have something to do with the Pacific Ocean and how it affects the views of English speakers! ;-) )
With the ‘cast of characters’ ‘leading’ the English speaking countries, I have little faith in any of them.
I think he meant the Hank Hill of our time.
You obviously don’t understand sarcasm.
IMO, Newt seems to be a better observer/adviser than active participant. For some reason, some people get too tangled up in things like Newt did in the 90’s.
The VP spot is the one I hope will be the next President after Trump. I don’t think Newt is the one for that. However, Chief of Staff? I don’t know, maybe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.