Posted on 03/10/2016 7:24:48 AM PST by jimbo123
Conservative radio host Mark Levin endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) late Wednesday as a tribute to former first lady Nancy Reagan.
“I decided today was the day ultimately because of Nancy Reagan’s death,” he said on “LevinTV.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Everyone is entitled to some screw-ups, and Mark was honorable enough to admit that his endorsement of Hatch was one. This time, Cruz is the right call, miles ahead of his competition. Thank you, Mark!
Just heard Mitt’s Senator from Utah did the same thing.
Cruz - the establishment candidate.
NOw I know this guy is a flake.
He’s endorsing Cruz, in honor of Nancy Reagan. YOu pompous little smug faced @ss.
Hilariously, Ed Klein, one of her biographers this morning was laughing about her “My goodness” crap. He said she has a filthy mouth in private, which those of us who disdain this woman, have known for years.
So please, campaign for her.
DITTOS! It's very sad to see Cruz, and other true conservatives, including even Rush, trashed on this site by Trump people, (which says something about which side they are really on IMO).
But please don't let them get you down. Cruz people need to stay here and counter their BS.
Also, I think some of them are actually "Team Hillary" trying to stir up as much division as possible so Republicans will stay home in the general election.
Exactly. This guy is a blooming idiot.
Hasn’t Levin been a Cruzer for a long time, his girlfriends son or something works for Cruz.
Cruz is the new Stealth Bush, the stench of warmed over Bush gets stronger minute by minute.
So, a successful business man who has employed thousands of people, generated numerous construction jobs, and helped spur local economies doesn't compare to a talk radio hack and junior pol whose only production is hot air? Sounds a lot like 1% talk to me.
I for one am not upset about Cruz getting an endorsement, I’m upset that Levin is evoking Nancy Reagan’s name in the process. That’s gauche as it gets.
Is Levin channeling Glen Beck, because it sounds very Beckian.
ROTFL!!
Levin’s endorsement doesn’t change the numbers. All the punditry in the world won’t change the numbers.
If Cruz doesn’t win Florida and Ohio, he has no pathway to victory.
You know, that's a very important point. I don't have any expertise when it comes to the Constitution or a lot of historical matters, even though I absolutely agree how important they are. As a result, I always used Mark Levin as my compass, and there was no one comparable. After this, and a few other things he's done lately, I don't feel that way any longer. If he can be consistently untruthful in other areas, there is no reason not to believe that doesn't bleed over into other elements. It has been a very difficult awakening for me or maybe I'm just growing up.
Unless we have a convention of the states where 34.222% of the delegates switch their votes 4 times on an odd day of the month. Tune into Levin TV for further details or pick up his latest book at BJs.
Jeez man stop the post whoring, we get it, Cruz walks on water, he’s Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson and Reagan rolled into one. If I hear a Cruz supporter use the term “principled” or “authentic conservative” one more time, its the knockout game for them. Kidding of course, but you guys need to stop selling so hard. He’s a nag running in the Kentucky Derby, crossing the finish line when the winner is getting that saddle of flowers. Principled loser and will be mathematically eliminated within the next few weeks.
Yeah, funny how that works, eh? The butthurt is strong from the idiots on the left and the Trump camp (coincidence there?). And now, alluva sudden Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin are 'the enemy". Only....they were always the enemy to 'this crowd'.
Old news. I guess “Constitutional expert” Levin doesn’t care if an illegal immigrant from Canada runs from president.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/02/report-ted-cruz-entered-us-illegally-1974/
Not as much of an insult as the obscene Trump attempting to compare himself to Reagan. Reagan never ridiculed the handicapped or used filthy language to describe women or during any campaign.
BTW Trump insulted Nancy Reagan’s appearance. “The transcript runs 68 pages long, but here are the parts of the interview that are truly damaging for Trump:
Smith: I’ve been invited to go to Ronald Reagan’s funeral. I’m debating about going.
Trump: Do you like her?
Smith: I did. I do like her. I think she’s….
Trump: You know, I respect that she was so loyal.
Smith: She’s, I don’t think she was terribly smart. She’s not a smart person.
Trump: I never heard that statement that you didn’t think she was that smart.
Smith: I don’t believe she’s very smart.
Trump: That’s very interesting.
Smith: She had really trivial….
Trump: She was never very beautiful. That’s for sure.
Smith: No, she wasn’t great. She was pretty. But not great.
Why Trump thought it was necessary to comment on the former First Lady’s appearance is beyond us, but her looks somehow seemed to matter. This is revealing for how Trump views women in general and their worth. Despite what he said about Mrs. Reagan, though, he had nothing but good things to say about Mr. Reagan’s appearance.
“President Reagan, on the other hand, was truly a handsome man.”
If Cruz loses Ohio and Florida, he will need 77% of the remaining votes to win. With Trump leading in most states, that isn’t a rational expectation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.