Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE OLIGARCHS' SUPER-PAC ANTI-TRUMP SAVAGERY
WND ^ | 3-7-16 | PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

Posted on 03/07/2016 6:00:40 PM PST by dynachrome

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: Elyse

How many speeches has Romney made on TV attacking Cruz? How many establishment PAC dollars from have been spent on attack ads targeting Cruz? How many times has the Speaker of the House and Republican office holders falsely called Cruz a racist?

Romney supported Cruz in his speech and asked voters to vote for him.

They may hate Cruz but they are using him as a tool to defeat Trump.


121 posted on 03/08/2016 4:09:03 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Our Principles PAC...

There only principle is the Fed feeding trough remain full.

122 posted on 03/08/2016 5:06:17 AM PST by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I watched the Perot takedown too and thought the same thing. Perot wasn’t a nutcase in my book. If the American people let this happen to Donald Trump then we truly are finished as a free nation. The globalists, open border supporters and one world order buy ins will have won.

Prayers up for Donald Trump.


123 posted on 03/08/2016 5:43:47 AM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The GOPe killing their part of the party like no one else ever could.


124 posted on 03/08/2016 5:45:50 AM PST by WilliamRobert (As the Trump circus rolls forward the clowns in the car grow in number.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeaugaRepublican

Please, please keep posting these! Perhaps the truth may sink in for some who insist on ignoring it.


125 posted on 03/08/2016 5:50:21 AM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GeaugaRepublican

Ted people are mistaking the free ride as a surge of support.


126 posted on 03/08/2016 5:52:49 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Cruz has cast his lot in with them. The salving message would be we love you Trumpians, come to us since we understand the policy better. But, no. Instead he’s latched onto the #nevertrump side. He’s become their useful idiot. If they knock Trump down with all the neg ads, next up will be him with even more. Dopey.


127 posted on 03/08/2016 5:56:10 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GeaugaRepublican

Thanx for doing that work!


128 posted on 03/08/2016 5:57:36 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Hear! Hear! Well said! That’s why I’m trying with all my heart not to give up hope completely for America. However, reading your spot on post; I can’t help but think that the devils have laid their groundwork too well and that Americans have allowed them to do it. The task of impressing what you just said on a dumbed down, social media addicted, hedonistic population that’s been spoon fed their mind numbing dope for decades is going to be a gargantuan task.


129 posted on 03/08/2016 6:08:03 AM PST by Aleya2Fairlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Cruz = Status Quo


130 posted on 03/08/2016 6:08:21 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

When “they” (Eliot Cohen and the other 115 people at the meeting referred to in the article - the oligarchs from here on out) are saying she’s the lesser evil, they’re not judging good and evil the way you and I do.

They are judging what a Clinton presidency would mean to their goals vs. what a Trump presidency would mean to their goals and they’ve decided that Clinton would be “less bad” than Trump. The question then is “what are their goals?”

As you say, Hillary’s time as SoS (and Senator, and First Lady) were disasters. If she’s the better choice to fulfill those goals then safety, security and prosperity of the US cannot be the goals of the oligarchs as she has proven to be miserable at achieving those goals.

If the goals are “keep the Washington DC gravy train rolling, keep importing cheap labor” are the oligarchs goals then Clinton makes much more sense. Much, much more.


131 posted on 03/08/2016 6:08:21 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (We need a separation of press and state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Of course nearly all the members of the GOP flock to Hillary and the DEMs rather than to Trump. She is closer to them, ideologically. The GOP is a globalist party, and has not a shred of nationalism in it, save for a handful of people in the peanut-gallery referred to as "Congress."
132 posted on 03/08/2016 6:12:52 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxFlint
Ted Cruz is their 2nd to last pick, but Ted's willingness, check that, desire to take money from billionaires gives them a future seat at the table if Cruz gets in. Ted Cruz is 2nd only to Hillary Clinton on Super Pac money. Trump reminds me of another New Yorker. As far as Trump goes, as they said about Serpico, "Frank, You don't take money. How can we trust a guy who doesn't take money."

Can't Trust a Guy Who Doesn't Take Money


133 posted on 03/08/2016 6:13:06 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican (Angry not mad. Phyllis Schlafly and Jeff Sessions are great endorsements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

You are Welcome! ;)


134 posted on 03/08/2016 6:15:03 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican (Angry not mad. Phyllis Schlafly and Jeff Sessions are great endorsements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Please borrow it. Send it far and wide!


135 posted on 03/08/2016 6:17:57 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican (Angry not mad. Phyllis Schlafly and Jeff Sessions are great endorsements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Ted Cruz is the lawyer for the Marxist globalist uniparty and he is prosecuting Trump. Cruzs’ job is to split the anti vote and thus deny Trump the GOP nomination.

You know who never criticizes other candidates? Losers. Cruz's job as a candidate is to win the nomination. Of course he's going to go after the frontrunner. Reagan would have done the same thing.

The result may be a brokered convention, but that's not why Cruz is doing it. He thinks he has a shot. It's a long shot but it's better than what Rubio has - no chance.

136 posted on 03/08/2016 6:34:12 AM PST by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; maggief; LucyT; Liz

Cleveland Stocking Up On Riot Gear Ahead Of Republican National Convention...
http://www.cleveland.com/rnc-2016/index.ssf/2016/03/cleveland_seeking_to_buy_riot.html

not related but ...

CLAIM: NOAA Data Shows NO Warming For 58 Years
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years


137 posted on 03/08/2016 6:56:02 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Dire Threat to Internet Free Speech? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3394704/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
“Hillary is the lesser evil, by a large margin,” says Eliot Cohen of the Bush II State Department. According to Politico’s Michael Crowley, Cohen helped line up neocons to sign the “Dump-Trump” manifesto. Another signer, Robert Kagan, wailed in The Washington Post, “The only choice will be to vote for Hillary Clinton.” Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid for their work.

Kagan and Cohen are just saying out loud what most neoconservatives and the rest of the GOP establishment is thinking. To them, establishment Democrats are just political opponents with whom they differ over small matters of tactics. Their real (common) enemies are the populist and libertarian grassroots.

138 posted on 03/08/2016 7:02:27 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks AW!M.


139 posted on 03/08/2016 7:10:20 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Liz
They duped Bush into spending trillions of American treasure and wasting rivers of young blood in their Iraq pipedream.

I agree that the neoconservatives were the loudest voice pushing the war in Iraq, but the notion that they "tricked" Bush implies that he was just their innocent dupe. Bush and (especially) Cheney knew exactly what they were doing. The alternative is that they are so stupid that they were easily manipulated by transparent lies and propaganda - which makes them even less fit for high office than if they were the masterminds.

140 posted on 03/08/2016 7:17:53 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson