(Me-Again!) Kelly Says She Doesn't Expect Trump Hostility In Debate

Associated Press ^ | Mar 2, 3:40 PM EST | David Bauder

[drewh]

Anticipating another appearance on a debate stage with Donald Trump, Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly says their public feud hasn't affected her preparation and she doesn't expect a renewal of hostilities with the Republican presidential front runner.

Kelly, who is moderating Thursday's debate with colleagues Bret Baier and Chris Wallace, said Trump was more in her head before the GOP debate prior to the Iowa caucuses, which he ultimately boycotted.

"I think he's much more focused on securing the nomination now and not on me, and that's how it should be," Kelly said. Thursday's debate, the 11th among Republicans, will be held at Detroit's Fox Theater from 9 to 11 p.m. EST.

Kelly's questioning angered Trump during the first GOP debate last August, most prominently when he was confronted with some of his past comments about women. He responded harshly, and skipped Fox's Iowa debate when the network refused to remove Kelly as moderator. Ted Cruz beat Trump in Iowa.

[Blue Highway]

They need to remove this witch from the panel. She cannot be unbiased.

[SevenofNine]

Well on gettv they showing Three Stooges movies on Gettv on Thursday night this month

And OTA channel Movies tv network going have the Chase

Vikings are going be on History channel tommrowo night

[Blue Highway]

Actually, shouldn’t it be, “It’s a twapppp”

[Blue Highway]

did she really sleep with Britt Hume? There are lots of rumors about an affair.

[Blue Highway]

do you not get that she has an agenda? An an agenda she wouldn’t use against the real enemy the Democrats?

[chris37]

She just so... not

[Gumdrop]

My, how dignified of you? Are you sentimental about your sophomoric HS years?

[maggief]

It’s a trap!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3404328/posts

Murdoch: GOP ‘would be mad’ not to unify around Trump if he’s nominee
The Hill ^ | March 2, 2016 | Jesse Byrnes

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3404331/posts?page=26

More Bad News for Marco Rubio: He Just Lost the Support of Fox News
NY Magazine ^

In his role as the donor class’s darling, Marco Rubio has enjoyed support from the Republicans’ media arm, Fox News. Throughout the primary, Fox provided Rubio with friendly interviews and key bookings, including the first prime-time response to Barack Obama’s Oval Office address on ISIS. Many of the network’s top pundits, including Stephen Hayes and Charles Krauthammer, have been enthusiastic boosters. Bill Sammon, Fox’s Washington managing editor, is the father of Rubio’s communications director, Brooke Sammon.

But this alliance now seems to be over. According to three Fox sources, Fox chief Roger Ailes has told people he’s lost confidence in Rubio’s ability to win. “We’re finished with Rubio,” Ailes recently told a Fox host. “We can’t do the Rubio thing anymore.”

Ailes was already concerned about Rubio’s lackluster performance in GOP primaries and caucuses, winning only one contest among the 15 that have been held. But the more proximate cause for the flip was an embarrassing New York Times article revealing that Rubio and Ailes had a secret dinner meeting in 2013 during which the Florida senator successfully lobbied the Fox News chief to throw his support behind the “Gang of 8” comprehensive immigration-reform bill. “Roger hates seeing his name in print,” a longtime Ailes associate told me. “He was appalled the dinner was reported,” the source said.

[jimbo123]

Its a trap. Why would anyone trust Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes?

[maggief]

Limbaugh does.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2009/11/11/rush_and_roger_ailes_speak_at_boy_scouts_awards_dinner

Rush and Roger Ailes Speak at Boy Scouts Awards Dinner
November 11, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

EXCERPT

RUSH: ... And the person that taught me to deal with this and to remain psychologically healthy was Roger Ailes. And had that not happened I wouldn’t be anywhere near where I am tonight. My relationship with Roger has been more deeply personal on a friendship level and a professional level than I’ve never experienced with anybody else that I’ve worked for or worked with. And even though Roger has had nothing to do with my radio show — he was the exec producer of my TV show for four years — the things I’ve learned from him about being a man, about the country, about how to be a professional, nobody else taught me.

[Bigg Red]

Trump vs. Tramp

[Bigg Red]

I guess I missed something. The “penis issue”? What?

[Bigg Red]

Yep.

[jimbo123]

Amnesty pimps. Ailes and Murdoch.

[blueplum]

"I think he's I'm much more focused on securing the nomination now the possibility I may be addressing the future president of the United States and not on me, and that's how it should be," Kelly said

fixed it

[Parley Baer]

“I guess I missed something. The “penis issue”? What?”

That was in reference to Rubio bringing up Trump with “small hands” and the corresponding insinuation of a “small penis”.

[digger48]

You must have forgotten that we CAN look at ones posting history.

I just looked at yours and found where you posted those 3 words.

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fake Rolex watches.

16 posted on 02/25/2016 9:22:47 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3402039/posts

You had exactly ONE reply to that comment and it made no mention of Germany or voting

To: Berlin_Freeper
https://dcgazette.com/2016/trump-recites-poetry-of-the-vicious-snake-it-goes-viral-in-europe/#

I thought of you when I heard Trump recite this poem...

27 posted on 02/25/2016 9:50:42 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot’s wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[emotionalcripple]

I guess I missed something. The “penis issue”? What?

---

Rubio said that Trump had exceptionally small hands. He implied that he had a small penis.

[Stentor]

She’s a despicable narcissist who will do anything to advance her career, and I do mean “anything”.

If she gets any more butch she's going to have to do gender reassignment. Does that help the career in some way?

[Berlin_Freeper]

You must have forgotten that we CAN look at ones posting history.

No, it is fine that you "CAN" do that since I don't mind being corrected on a small error. I am very important and what I posted is just so unbelievable you were understandably compelled to find something amiss.

But if you follow the replies, which is easy to do, you can see me getting teamed up against by a person who even admitted entering from another thread just to harass me on something off topic.

The other attacks I have mixed up with another thread posted that same day (a week ago) and only an hour later and you can follow those replies too.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3401580/posts?page=94#94

Unfortunately, those kinds of crazy attacks have become more frequent from Trumpters. Like just an hour ago I dared to post "#NeverTrump". What do you think the kind of reply that could possibly bring? It would be unbelievable to you if I posted that a person brought up a criminal case that I posted about five years ago and said that shows "a pattern".

Whatever that crazy abuse bs is supposed to mean... but certainly you do not believe it and must see what I have amiss from an hour ago compared to my memory from a busy week ago.

Get busy. Won't take you long.