Posted on 03/01/2016 3:51:53 PM PST by jazusamo
God’s gotta do Santa Claus just this ONE TIME lol
Who would have thought that our society would start supporting men in the women’s restrooms?
Shakes head...
Howza bout the Boxing Glove of Grace being a .50 caliber Barrett M-82?
That is anti gospel except when it literally comes to having to kill a would-be physical murderer and it is obviously not a sacrifice for witness situation either.
We are vastly far from that. Put that sword down Peter and let God put the centurion’s ear back on.
OMG - another “wide stance” Republican?
Our worse problem here is the liberals forcing a one size fits all answer upon us. We think we’re so smart with conservative one size fits all answers? Liberals know how to follow in our wake and work the maximum mischief. We’ve taught them!
Mothertrucker.
His alleged reason, he’s for “local control”.
Eff Ewe, Governor Doucheregard.
“They are all rolling over for “Big Anus.” Better get used to it.”
LOL! “Big Anus”... ROTFL!
This is another reason to support home schooling, if some lib wants to raise their boy as a girl they can do it AT HOME!
And leave the rest of the taxpayers the heck alone...
Sad....my last motorcycle tour to the Black Hills is my last....such beauty. Glad I have my photos...
Me too...I’m from the older generations like I believe you to be, the wife and I can’t quite wrap our heads around stuff like this.
We’ve got grandkids, some are adults and thank the Lord they don’t look at us like we’re nuts when these kind of things come up, they understand and agree because of their upbringing...We’re blessed I guess.
He’s on the PAC train.
And I mean it... morality efforts that attempt more grand a sweep than necessary, just because we are frustrated, will further perpetuate the social idea that all moral issues call for this.
Let mores shift a bit, such as with regard to sanctity of life, and we find this attitude coming right back down the road at us with the likes of Roe v. Wade and “righteously” defended too!
Small scale, local freedom based answers tend to work better in the long run. Getting ordinances in cities is a quiet revolution that trying for a statewide law would never achieve. It might only plug 80% of the hole but that’s better than plugging none of it, because the answer was wished on willfully recalcitrant big cities too.
You might not know wisdom until your folly comes down and bites you on the rear, with “non local control” exercised by liberals in their (inverted) righteous indignation.
This is some of the stuff I want rolled back.
I’m a big enough guy to let a tranny in my restroom if there has to be a place for them to use the head.
I wouldn’t have wanted them around my wife or daughter. The shock value would be something I wouldn’t have wanted them to have to deal with.
I identify with your comments.
Which suggests some other answers, like making the default destination in case of doubt, be the men’s room.
Might a smart move. Let the normal people see what happens when any male can go poke around the girls room. Exposure of the sick mentality that the left espouses.
Sounds like any swinging Richard can go where he claims he belongs. The only way to end this sickness is to expose it.
Recall the fuching traitor bastard.
Who might have actually done the wisest thing given the limited choice available.
How about revising the law a little differently. Perhaps the destination of doubt should be the men’s room or a dedicated unisex facility.
Not every problem needs sturm and drang.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.