Posted on 02/27/2016 4:20:58 PM PST by gg188
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., penned a joint op-ed for the Wall Street Journal Wednesday calling on Congress to pass Trade Promotion Authority legislation. The two conservative lawmakers argue that the legislation, also known as "Fast Track," is urgently needed to strengthen the U.S.'s ability to negotiate future trade deals.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Cruz sells out country sovereignty. Yet one more reason to doubt his credentials as a conservative. Or wise.
Trump is the only one I trust to go against the globalist tide.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Cruz, Ryan urge Senate to pass Fast Track, lodi90 wrote:
So that must mean Trump accepting Christie’s endorsement means he’s as liberal as Christie?
Good question. Does Cruz’s enabling Obama’s secret trade agenda make him a liberal?
______________________________________
What secret are you refrain to?
The TPA requires 30 days for congressional review, then 60 days for public review before an up or down vote. Currently it looks like no booted prior to the election.
Apparently you’re laboring under some misconceptions, albeit willfully on your part...
https://www.tedcruz.org/a-note-to-conservatives-on-trade-agreements/
Texas Senator and GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) argued Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) "is not giving the president more authority" and that Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is "not accurate" in some of his claims regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Friday's broadcast of "The Kuhner Report" on Boston's WRKO.
Cruz argued that he had been the staunchest opponent of President Barack Obama in Congress. He then separated TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) and the TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership). He touched on TPA first, stating that "history has demonstrated, the only way to get a trade agreement adopted is with fast-track. Since FDR, consistently, for 80 years, presidents in both parties have had fast-track. Anytime fast-track has lapsed, trade agreements don't get negotiated."
He later added that it was a "misunderstanding" to say TPA gave away the Senate's treaty power. Cruz stated that "Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law. Number one, you can pass a treaty ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate. Or number two, you can pass legislation passed by a majority of both of houses of Congress and signed by the president. ... TPA uses the second constitutional path."
And "it's been long recognized that the Constitution's Origination Clause applies to trade bills, which means the House of Representatives has to be involved. There's a reason why trade bills have historically not been done as treaties, because the Constitution says that anything concerning the raising of revenues, and trade bills concern tariffs, which are the raising of revenues, has to originate in the House of Representatives. So, the process of approving a trade agreement through both houses of Congress has been the way it has been done for roughly a century. And it is not giving the president more authority."
Regarding TPP, Cruz said he was undecided because there was no "actual agreement" regarding TPP.
He later blasted classification of the text of TPP as "idiotic." He continued that claims made by Senator Jeff Sessions were "not accurate"... this trade agreement, now, at least the current draft... does not impact, change, alter, or effect US immigration law. There is a brief section in the TPP that concerns issues of immigration, but explicitly, the United States doesn't join that section."
He further pointed to his amendment to prevent trade agreements from impacting immigration that the House agreed to include. Cruz continued, "Beyond that, the notion of giving up sovereignty and an international body that can alter US law, Jeff, I have spent 20 years fighting to defend United States sovereignty. There is no one in the Senate who has been a stronger opponent of international bodies taking away our authority. ... And it is simply false that the TPP trade agreement gives up our sovereignty. There is nothing in TPA or TPP that can give a foreign body the ability to make binding law in the United States of America under our Constitution." Although, he stated that it was natural and understandable people would be suspicious of a secret agreement.
He added that "if this president tried to slip something in, it would have to be approved by Congress, and by the way, under the terms of fast-track, TPA, any trade agreement, including the TPP, must be public at least 60 days, the text of it, before it's voted on."
Later, Cruz conceded that while he hasn't "studied" TPP "the way one would for weeks and weeks on end, the way one would during the 60 days when it is public. In a six, seven-hundred page agreement can there be things buried in a footnote that one doesn't see? Sure," Sessions' claims that TPP would undermine US law are "not accurate."
He concluded that the Obama administration would like people to blame job losses on free trade, but that free trade is not to blame for job losses.
(h/t The Right Scoop)
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/06/12/cruz-tpa-doesnt-give-obama-more-power-sessions-on-not-accurate-on-tpp/
______________________________________
GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that he would vote against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal between the United States and 11 other countries on Friday while campaigning in Iowa.
According to the Des Moines Register, Cruz said he is "deeply concerned" with the trade pact.
"While Cruz said he supports free trade, he believes the Trans Pacific Partnership would undermine U.S. immigration laws and the nation's sovereignty," reported the Des Moines Register.
"There are a number of Republicans on that (debate) stage who support TPP, who support (the Trade Promotion Authority)," Cruz stated. "I voted against TPA and I intend to vote against TPP." ..."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/21/ted-cruz-vows-vote-tpp-trade-deal-iowa/
It doesn’t seem to matter how many times you try to explain the difference between TPA and TPP people still don’t understand but maybe they will read this again and understand why Cruz voted the way he did. He was trying to insure that Obama’s secret deal couldn’t go through without the details being made public before the vote.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3299491/posts
This is a one sided Cruz hit piece. Read the whole story!
Thanks for posting that, Melania is HOT!!
I’ll see if I can find one of the wookie for you, she’s more your style.
How far Rush has fallen from October 2015!
Trump’s hairdo is a tad lopsided .
.
since I’m a lady who’s quite heterosexual post a picture of Steve McQueen and I’ll be very happy!!!!
Here’s a Breitbart article about Trump and TPA:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/22/donald-trump-tells-senate-to-vote-no-on-obamatrade-tpa/
Trump posted on Twitter: “The Senate must NOT pass TPA! Any Senator who votes for it is disqualified for being POTUS. Protect the American worker and manufacturer!”
GOP presidential candidates... Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)... voted for it.
Double BS in spades. When CRuz voted cloture on TPA it was over. Period.
Prove it. Just because he believed that Congress would never approve anything negotiated by Commander Xero and wants the next President to have that authority is not a sellout. It may be an error in judgment (considering Ryan and McConnell) but it is not prima faceae evidence of his intent.
“Cruz was better before the campaign handlers and donors got their hands on him. “
100% agree! Cruz has maybe three or four people on his current staff that were with him during his Senate run. Cruz has gotten some very BAD advice. It’s not Trump or Carson or their supporters sinking Cruz. It’s Team Cruz that’s sinking Cruz.
Got any recent pics of the Trumps and Clintons? That one is ten years old. Hillary actually looked female.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.