Posted on 02/13/2016 3:19:03 PM PST by OneVike
Meant to say FIFTH Amendment, last two sentences (not 2nd).
Difficult to get behind a sitting Senator when NONE of the 99 OTHER Senators in the Senate have endorsed him.. NOT ONE!
WHY is that???
I meant to say I’ll buy every fifth round of tequila, but I’ll buy every second round!
Tequila for everyone!
That’s if you believe Trump didn’t just “convert” to “conserving-tism” on guns, abortion, taxes, etc. just to win the primary. He is still liberal on many issues, like NSA surveillance which he loves. If he looks for a judge who backs the NSA surveillance he likes, we’re losing something already. Not to mention, if many GOP presidents appointed bad judges they didn’t “sniff out” properly, how can we expect political newbie Trump to not make the same mistake?
Will any of his immigration policy stand when there is a court who will block it on “equal protection” violations? No conservative law will stand.
Why are you looking to people like Lindsey Graham to help you make your decision?
7 Senators endorsed Rubio,
5 Senators endorsed Yeb.
2 endorsed Huckabee.
1 each endorsed Kay-sick, Paul and Graham.
Which of those candidates are you backing due to those oh-so-valued Senate endorsements? The Senate being the liberal cesspool that it is.
>>>Trump say the SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage was the “law of the landâ€<<<
It is the Law of the land. Try and stop a Gay Wedding and see what happens. Sorry, the truth is a bitch sometimes.
Just wait until the inevitable “If they can do it so can I” Lawsuits pop up for Incestuous and Polygamous Marriage.
You ain’t seen noting yet.
Give it a rest with the avoidance of answering my SIMPLE question.
So.. ANSWER my question.
WHY does Cruz NOT have ONE endorsement from a fellow Senator.. NOT ONE! WHY???
You’re absolutely right. A “conservative” appointee can and may turn liberal, but a liberal appointee only gets more liberal. aka Earl Warren, Souter, Roberts
Many valid counterpoints from you and others, JediJones. Most all of the remaining players have brought us to this point -
Problem. They did build that. They (current and former) should all be in prison for plundering America.
Socialism Is Legal Plunder - Bastiat
Enforcer/Beneficiary - IRS and the weaponized agencies of the superstate.
“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.” - list of grievances; Declaration
6. But the grand nostrum will be a public debt
7. It must not be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have a deep stake in the game. This is an essential point, and happily is attended with no difficulty. A sufficient number, properly disposed, can alternately legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy, until a due portion of the property of their constituents has passed into their hands to give them an interest against their constituents
8. The ways in which a great debt, so constituted and applied, will contribute to the ultimate end in view are both numerous and obvious. (1) The favorite few, thus possessed of it, whether within or without the government, will feel the staunchest fealty to it, and will go through thick and thin to support it in all its oppressions and usurpations. (2) Their money will give them consequence and influence, even among those who have been tricked out of it. (3) They will be the readiest materials that can be found for a hereditary aristocratic order, whenever matters are ripe for one. (4) A great debt will require great taxes; great taxes, many taxgatherers and other officers; and all officers are auxiliaries of power.
Rules for Radicals? No, “Rules for Changing a Limited Republican Government into an Unlimited Hereditary One”
http://www.constitution.org/cmt/freneau/republic2monarchy.htm
You cannot understand my point that the Senate is NOT conservative? There’s a reason Mark Levin says the amendment to give us direct election of Senators was a major turning point in the decline of our country. The vast majority of Senators have not endorsed anybody. Do you think that means they hate all the candidates?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.