Two-Thirds of NH GOP Voters Support Trump’s Muslim Ban

Breitbart ^ | 9 Feb 2016 | John Nolte

[mandaladon]

According to the New Hampshire exit polls, a full 66% of Republican voters back a “ban on Muslims from entering the U.S.” This obviously is good news for Donald Trump, who proposed a temporary ban on foreign Muslims entering the country until our government is in a better position to avoid another Sacramento terror attack. The female jihadist who committed that terror attack was here on a fiancée visa.

By all accounts, Trump made this proposal based only on his instincts, not any kind of focus group polling. Every other candidate in the Republican primary disagreed with the proposal, many outright condemned it as bigotry.

[AbolishCSEU]

And the irony is that liberalism greatly fans the flames of Islamic terrorism. It only proves to the Muslims that the Western world is the Great Satan.

The only solution would be to adopt unfettered conservatism.
Once that is accomplished the Middle East can be turned into a glass parking lot.

[Mr Apple]

No to all towel head Islamic Muslim Rapefugees!

[baltimorepoet]

The funny thing is, my interpretation of the Constitution would be that banning one specific religion among hundreds does not establish a state religion.

By comparison, I find it amusing that the Germans can be so hostile towards the cult of Scientology, and yet not so hostile to the cult of Islam. Scientology seems mainly to be a bunch of weirdos, whereas Islam results in horrific murders and terrorism.

[Teacher317]

Japan has severe restrictions on Islam already, as does Angola... and as we all know, ALL Muslim nations have severe restrictions on all other faiths.

[baltimorepoet]

Japan has severe restrictions on Islam already, as does Angola... and as we all know, ALL Muslim nations have severe restrictions on all other faiths.

Exactly! Turnabout is fair play.

I say the same thing about Mexico's harsh immigration policies towards Central America. They have no room to complain about our much laxer policies.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

‘... banning one specific religion among hundreds does not establish a state religion ...’

Not to mention, states have no authority to ban refugees. Immigration is a genuine constitutional power of the federal governement. And only US citizens are covered by the Bill of Rights.