Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As First Lady, Hillary Did Not Have Security Clearance But Received Classified Information
dailycaller.com ^ | 2/3/2016 | Chuck Ross

Posted on 02/03/2016 8:45:35 AM PST by rktman

When Hillary Clinton was first lady, she did not have a security clearance, but she was "often provided" classified information, she told her longtime friend and ABC News host George Stephanopoulos in a long-forgotten Dec. 30, 2007 interview rediscovered by The Daily Caller.

It was just weeks before the 2008 Iowa caucuses and Clinton was out touting her foreign policy experience, both as a senator from New York and as first lady. She wanted to be seen as the strong and experienced choice in contrast to upstart Barack Obama, then a senator from Illinois.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2007; cheats; clinton; hillaryfirstlady; liars; thieves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Still weird how those of us who have gone through the process of obtaining some level of security clearance wait for months but someone gets elected and BOOM! You're cleared. Maybe there's a little known clause in extra small print that says the spouse of the (p)resident has clearance by marriage. I don't know.
1 posted on 02/03/2016 8:45:35 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Isn’t that exactly what Petraeus did?


2 posted on 02/03/2016 8:53:44 AM PST by Defiant (RINOs are leaders of a party without voters. Trump/Cruz are leaders of voters without a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Because Rodham is politically immune, the abstract action was blameless in her case, therefore none of her confederates can GO TO JAIL. (DO NOT COLLECT $200.)


3 posted on 02/03/2016 8:54:56 AM PST by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
...and now she can got no clearance and wants to be President!
4 posted on 02/03/2016 8:55:16 AM PST by Baynative (If socialist democrat ideas are so good for people why must they be mandatory?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

See. It is not her fault, she just happened to be there when all that secret briefing stuff was disseminated.
Or something.


5 posted on 02/03/2016 8:55:44 AM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hitlary and her staff never did get security clearances. She even joked about how she was able to prevent the clearances from taking place.


6 posted on 02/03/2016 8:56:03 AM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

A lot of “news” (read: propaganda) coming out these days which “justifies” Hillary’s sloppy and illegal handling of classified material.

“Everybody does it”
“I’ve always done it this way”

They are preparing her Get Out of Jail card and being fairly blatant about it.


7 posted on 02/03/2016 8:56:35 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I assume Calipha MooseChelle is in a similar position since 2009.


8 posted on 02/03/2016 8:57:23 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

9 posted on 02/03/2016 8:57:41 AM PST by Daffynition (*Security, confiscate their coats. Get them out of here. It's 10 below zero out there ~DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Remember her statement when Bill took office?

“WE are the President!”


10 posted on 02/03/2016 8:58:30 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Judge Nepalitano explained that nothing is marked with the word “classified”, because they are marked with other words like “top secret” for example.
It’s a Clinton slippery word use again.


11 posted on 02/03/2016 9:03:22 AM PST by vrtom (Just an observer of the political scene, learning what I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hillary couldn’t ever pass the security clearance of a felon trying to enlist in the military on the advice of his parole officer

Any congressman approving her stare department appointment who pretends he did not know tgat is corrupt.

And that’s tge state of tge Union


12 posted on 02/03/2016 9:09:41 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

The union


13 posted on 02/03/2016 9:10:17 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rktman

We could fill the universe with the ‘irregularities’ in the Clinton WH


14 posted on 02/03/2016 9:12:38 AM PST by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Boundaries are not in the lexicon of the Clintonista mafioso. Not because the rules are only for “the little people”, but because they have basically criminal minds.

A bridge too far? Not for them. Bluster and blame and heap scorn upon the challenger, and others will retreat, rather than face that sort of abuse. Plus it is backed up by some rather wealthy plutocrats acting as the “grey eminences”, a person or persons who exercise power or influence in a certain sphere without holding an official position. Remember “Moveon.org”? George Soros?

And Sid Blumenthal.


15 posted on 02/03/2016 9:17:30 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
MEMO TO THE FBI There is new evidence surfacing that neither Hillary nor her key staff signed the official State Dept exit form required upon termination of employment.

My gut feeling is the cunning Clintonids didn't sign off b/c that would have cutoff their access to classified and other State Dept info......info the greedy Clintons and their cronies use to cash-in.

==============================================

The FBI should determine if Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Sid Blumenthal and other Clinton cronies are STILL considered State Dept employees---perhaps as contractors--- and are still receiving classified State Dept mail and cashing US govt paychecks.

REFERENCE Brian Pagliano---billed as Hillary's personal IT--- left her employ then surfaced on the public payroll as a State Dept contractor.

======================================

Taxpayers demand to know who else among the Clinton cronies are cashing US govt paychecks. It's an old bureaucratic trick for a politician to hand-pick top aides and put them on the public payroll long after you think they're gone. Who might still be cashing State Dept paychecks?

<><> Hillary?

<><> Bill Clinton?

<><> Sid Blumenthal?

<><> Huma Abedin,

<><> Anthony Weiner, Huma's husband?

<><> Cheryl Mills?

<><> Cheryl mills' live-in David Domenici?

<><> Chelsea Clinton?

<><> Chelsea's husband?

========================================

FREEPER ACTION NOW---CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

Demand Congress send you all available information on individuals connected to Hillary still cashing US govt paychecks.

In light of the $6 billion that went missing from the State Dept's contractor fund when Hillary exited, taxpayers demand to know who is listed as a State Dept contractor....and whether they are receiving classified State Dept info.

16 posted on 02/03/2016 9:23:26 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vrtom
Judge Nepalitano explained that nothing is marked with the word classified
The judge should stick to TV makeup and hair dye - I spent 10 years in the defense industry working with various naval piping and mechanical systems. The drawings that were "classified" were stamped as such in large letters and also said "not releasable to foreign nationals." If you left one sitting out over the weekend, you were fired.
17 posted on 02/03/2016 9:23:46 AM PST by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

You said,

“Still weird how those of us who have gone through the process of obtaining some level of security clearance wait for months but someone gets elected and BOOM! You’re cleared.”

To me, it’s not “weird”, it’s CRIMINAL,


18 posted on 02/03/2016 9:29:18 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
We could fill the universe with the irregularities in the Clinton WH.

I keep wondering who in the Clinton administration was the bagman in the Columbian deal? Recent events reveal billions of our tax dollars (disguised as US foreign aid) were being kept warm in corrupt Columbia......until Clinton felt the coast was clear to have their (cough) charity setup The Clinton Foundation's secret investment fund in Columbia in January 2016.

Every aspect of the Bill Clinton presidency must be examined for wrongdoing......recent news reports say the notoriously greedy Clintons used their tax-exempt Clinton Foundation charity to setup a money-making private equity fund in the corrupt country of Columbia.

Why Columbia?

WIKI REFERENCE---In 2000, the Clinton administration committed $1.3 billion in foreign aid to the corrupt country of Columbia...... and up to five hundred military personnel to train local forces.

An additional three hundred civilian personnel were allowed to assist in the eradication of coca. This aid was an addition to $330 million of previously approved US aid to Colombia. $818 million was earmarked for 2000, with $256 million for 2001.

The Clinton-era appropriations for his Columbia Plan made Colombia the third largest recipient of foreign aid from the United States at the time.

--SNIP--

As of 2008, the U.S. has provided nearly $1.3 billion to Colombia through Clinton Plan Colombia nonmilitary aid programs:

<><> Alternative Development (2000-2008 cost: $500 million)

<><> Internally Displaced Persons (2000-2008 cost: $247 million)

<><> Demobilization and Reintegration (2000-2008 cost: $44 million)

<><> Democracy and Human Rights (2000-2008 cost: $158 million)

<><> Promote the Rule of Law (2000-2008 cost: $238 million)

LONG READ--REST AT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Colombia

==============================================

ADDENDUM When the Columbian deal surfaced, Bill Clinton hurriedly closed it down....what is he hiding?

19 posted on 02/03/2016 9:33:40 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Liz, check out the link(s) at this post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3391438/posts?page=181#181

According to these links, Huma made the “mistake” of signing her 109 & turning it in.

Cheryl typed in her name - not a signature & of course, Hilligula’s can’t be found.


20 posted on 02/03/2016 9:33:48 AM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson