Top US naval intelligence officer barred from access to classified naval intelligence

So … what has transpired over the last 800 days or so in the national-security arena? ISIS went from being the “jayvee team” to a terrorist quasi-state launching deadly attacks from the Sinai to the streets of Paris. Iran’s navy fired missiles at US Navy ships and captured ten American sailors. China built an island in the middle of the ocean and claimed the area as territorial waters. North Korea has … continued being North Korea.

What did two top officials of naval intelligence know about any of these crises, and others? Probably nothing at all other than what appeared in the papers, because the admiral in charge of naval intelligence has had all of his clearances suspended since November 2013. The Washington Post reported last night that one of Vice Admiral Ted Branch’s key aides had his clearance suspended at the same time:

Loveless got shifted out of that assignment eventually to what the Post’s Craig Whitlock describes as “a slightly less sensitive position,” but Branch remains in charge of naval intelligence. How, though, can Branch effectively run an intelligence service while not having clearance to access the intel it produces? Better yet — why has it taken more than two years for this decision to get seriously challenged?

For one thing, it turns out that the Justice Department never completed its corruption investigation. It has gone on for more than 800 days without a determination of whether Branch and Loveless committed criminal or liable acts. Investigators have not shared their findings with the military, for good reason, and the Navy assumed that it wouldn’t take long. Whitlock hears from one senior Navy official that "until these things resolve themselves, we're kind of frozen.”

Actually, no, they’re not frozen at all. All due respect to Admiral Branch and the presumption of innocence, but the security of the US and the need for maximum effectiveness in naval intelligence takes precedence over the man’s career. Leadership in the Navy and in the White House should have taken action to move Branch and Loveless completely out of the way so that a new commander for naval intelligence could take the reins. That should have happened two years ago. The lack of action by the Obama administration to deal with this situation demonstrates an appalling lack of seriousness about national security at a time when threats are rising, not receding.

For that matter, the 800-plus days Justice has taken on the criminal case seems a little long, too. Corruption cases can become very complicated, but is it taking this long because it’s complicated, or is it being stalled?

CENTRAL VIEW for Monday, January 18, 2016
by William Hamilton, Ph.D.
Iranian coup: A tale of two U.S. Navy vessels

Last week, the U.S. Navy dispatched two of its fearsomely armed Riverine Command Boats (RCBs) to patrol between Kuwait and Bahrain. Somehow, the RCBs were seized by the Iranian Navy; the crewmembers arrested, and — even though the U.S. and Iran are not technically at war — treated as Prisoners of War (POWs). How could this happen?

The Swedish-designed, U.S.- manufactured RCBs cost $2.8 million per copy. Each RCB carries six machine guns, to include a .50 caliber Gatling gun, plus grenade launchers. Covered with armor plating able to deflect AK-47 fire, the RCB’s 49.4 mile-per-hour top speed means RCBs can outrun every known surface warship.

To guard against surprise attack, RCBs carry the Sea FLIR III infrared sensor system, thermal imaging, a laser rangefinder, and long-range radar. Navigation is by a top-of-the line GPS and chart plotter system, along with traditional chart and compass back-up. The RCB’s world-wide communications gear nets with ships, aircraft, and ground forces.

Operating in pairs, the RCBs provide each other with mutual fire support. If one RCB is disabled, the other RCB can tow it to safety. Thus, the question arises: How could two RCBs lose their ability to navigate at the same time and stray into Iranian waters? And how could two world-class weapons platforms be seized by the, arguably, inferior Iranian Navy?

Apparently, one of the RCBs had a propulsion problem and radioed U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain for assistance. Congressman Louis Gohmert (R) of Texas claims the Obama White House intervened, asked the Iranian Navy to provide assistance, and ordered the U.S. 5th Fleet to stand down.

By long-standing naval custom, disabled boats found in territorial waters are rendered assistance, and simply escorted back into international waters. Their crews are not subjected to POW treatment or put on world-wide video display, looking like criminals.

But, instead of being treated as distressed vessels exercising the mariners’ right of innocent passage, the Iranians arrested the crew members, treated them as POWs, and, somehow, got the officer-in-charge to make filmed statements praising the Iranians and saying the treatment the crew received was: “Fantastic.”

Absent Congressman Gohmert’s explanation — citing White House intervention — it appears Articles II and V of the U.S. military’s Code of Conduct were violated. Article II states: “I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist.” Article V reads: “When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the best of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.”

Alternatively, could it be that the White House-imposed Rules of Engagement (ROE) robbed the RCBs of their “means to resist”? Were the RCB’s awesome weapons even permitted to be loaded? Congress should demand to see the Operations Order under which the two RCBs left Kuwait for Bahrain and demand copies of all the communications between the RCBs, U.S. 5th Fleet, and the White House. Meanwhile, the RCB crews are left twisting in the wind.

Nationally syndicated columnist, William Hamilton, is a laureate of the Oklahoma Journalism Hall of Fame, the Colorado Aviation Hall of Fame, the Oklahoma University Army ROTC Wall of Fame, and is a recipient of the University of Nebraska 2015 Alumni Achievement Award. He was educated at the University of Oklahoma, the George Washington University, the Infantry School, the U.S Naval War College, the University of Nebraska, and Harvard University.

2016. William Hamilton.

Dr. Hamilton can be contacted at:
P.O. Box 2001
Granby, CO 80446

http://www.central-view.com/past.asp?number=1819

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.