Posted on 01/26/2016 9:13:45 AM PST by Isara
Simply click each policy or issue to read the back-story.
And it doesn’t matter.
IBTDS.
Please click on the dots for more details on the ratings of the candidates.
Budget, Spending & Debt | ||
Civil Liberties | ||
Education | ||
Energy & Environment | ||
Foreign Policy & Defense | ||
Free Market | ||
Health Care & Entitlements | ||
Immigration | ||
Moral Issues | ||
Second Amendment | ||
Taxes, Economy & Trade |
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
It is telling that the only example of Washington Examiner’s hit piece on Trump mainly cites a 1994 opinion by him. I’ve been castigated by some here for citing opinions of various candidates going all the way back to irrelevant 2013. 1994? Oh my what a frigging travesty.
Stealing the land from the Indians (or forcing them to "voluntarily" sign a treaty under threat of military action) didn't hurt the growth either.
and Ted Cruz's campaign ad lied about her house being bulldozed. Nice conservative values.
Actually Trump has repeated his support for Kelo during this campaign, including in one of the debates. So this is not an opinion from 1994, but his current stand on the issue.
Um, isn't the Fifth Amendment a "core conservative belief"? It was for the Founders, and it is what allows for Eminent Domain. How do they think we built the interstate highway system? Private property rights are NOT absolute, and can be taken by the govermnent, so long as "just compensation" is offered.
Until the last few months I hadn’t realized what a “challenged” group we have here.
The same issues are raised almost daily by people who don’t seem to know. You feel so sorry for them.
Some of them post things here that are demonstrably untrue.
They don’t have the mental faculties to know it, or the morals to know that isn’t right.
Some of them know they are doing it, and then ask us to contact a third party, as if that third party owned their morality.
Sad really.
And of course the man they support is the most moral person in all the world.
The amoral assure of that, and we smile.
Yet the WE article prominently mentions the 1994 thing as prima facie evidence. We can all imply and equivocate all we feel is necessary for our candidate. I like Trump now mainly because my prior support for Cruz was diminished by constant ridiculous attempts by his supporters that border on reckless invective. I STILL like both of them and would be happy to have either as the nominee, but I don’t personally countenance the diminishment of either among what I think are like minded supporters here in the end.
We are getting out of hand here and this needs to stop.
Thank the Lord, Cruz is defending the rights of a crack house to exist in Atlantic City. Where would the crack heads go had Trump been able to develop that property?
â[W]hen you have a hero, leading the troops in the heat of battle against a despised oppressor, you donât worry about his marriages, past ideological indiscretions or salty language. You charge right behind him.â This is largely why Trumpâs contradictions donât matter.
-Selwyn Duke
tagline says it...
The desires of King Donald supercede the Constitution. Got a problem with that?
When you have a hero, leading the troops in the heat of battle against a despised oppressor, you don’t worry about his marriages, past ideological indiscretions or salty language. You charge right behind him. This is largely why Trump’s contradictions don’t matter.
-Selwyn Duke
Trying again...
Bankruptcy laws are older than anyone here
Jobs created by Cruz? 0
Property rights were lost by GH Bush appointee David Souter not Trump
Cruz lies about a house that still stands
Talk about standing ?
You can have Glen Beck
And Trump is on record saying that he 100% supports it.
Personally I think they are both sociopaths. On a continuum they may even be at about the same place.
So I will vote for either or the one that will keep us the farthest from communism. That libertarian one looks good but won’t beat Hernia.
(Hillary+Bernie)
Cruz lied, this story died.
Kelo wasn't about public works projects; it defended the government's taking private property to sell or give to another private owner. Trump thinks that's just fine.
That's what's troubling us -- not the blasted interstate highway system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.