Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forest Service rejects proposed route of Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Richmond Times-Dispatch ^ | January 21, 2016 | MICHAEL MARTZ

Posted on 01/25/2016 10:15:38 AM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2016 10:15:38 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Seriously, why don’t we all just shelter in place because, you know, some critter somewhere could get injured. And, aren’t we all adding to the carbon footprint anyway by working, or living? So let’s just shut it all down — all of it.


2 posted on 01/25/2016 10:18:01 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney


3 posted on 01/25/2016 10:23:48 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I am so sick of tired of being tired of this crap. Environmentalists need to go to hell...an be done with it
Freegards
LEX


4 posted on 01/25/2016 10:24:22 AM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

No surprise there.

Must protect the salamanders and squirrels .. From any and all “assumed” and “projected” possible potential dangers.


5 posted on 01/25/2016 10:24:57 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

Environmentalists are just useful idiots. Turn the land over to the states.


6 posted on 01/25/2016 10:31:24 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And this is why the Feds shouldn’t own these lands.


7 posted on 01/25/2016 10:34:18 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why not use existing electrical transmission rights of way? There are already enough of those cutting through the forests and over mountains in WV and western VA.


8 posted on 01/25/2016 11:07:02 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Need to shut off the gas to region they can heat their homes with wind and solar.


9 posted on 01/25/2016 11:11:36 AM PST by fudimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

Why not using existing rights of way, following electric transmission lines or along highways?

We prefer to co-locate with existing rights of way where possible, but oftentimes it is not feasible. For example, electric transmission lines can traverse steep terrain in ways pipelines cannot. In addition, there often is not enough room along highway rights of way or there are other restrictions.

https://www.dom.com/library/domcom/pdfs/gas-transmission/atlantic-coast-pipeline/acp-faq-general.pdf?la=en


10 posted on 01/25/2016 11:13:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Cow Knob Salamander

Cheat Mountain Salamander

Cheat Mountain train wreck. They had one trainwreck and don't want a pipeline wreck

11 posted on 01/25/2016 11:18:32 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
"Turn the land over to the states."

You would think that WV would readily endorse the pipeline as a means of exporting their natural gas. Especially given the decline of coal. Good for their economy but I am sure the NIMBY's (not in my back yard) will fight tooth and nail to support the Forest Service's position.

12 posted on 01/25/2016 11:45:04 AM PST by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I’d be willing to bet that many of these Forest Service employees enjoy heat from natural gas, in their homes and offices...and that travels through a pipeline.


13 posted on 01/25/2016 11:52:36 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Consequently, the pipeline project does not meet the agency's minimum requirements for a special use permit to cross the George Washington

Oh, what irony.

14 posted on 01/25/2016 12:34:39 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (I got nothin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Of course they do.

If we are blessed with a shillary or burnie loss these USFS people should be let go and the rest sent packing back to tending Smokey the Bear.


15 posted on 01/25/2016 1:20:55 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ben Luckett, staff attorney at Appalachian Mountain Advocates, said the proposed 125-foot-wide construction right of way and 75-foot-wide permanent right of way for the pipeline would result in clear-cutting through the national forests, “causing dramatic forest fragmentation through some of the most high-quality forest habitat in our region.”

Bullspit. It creates habitat.


16 posted on 01/25/2016 1:21:45 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Game Trails


17 posted on 01/25/2016 1:30:50 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thackney; mikey_hates_everything; SunkenCiv; NicknamedBob; SoothingDave
Why not using existing rights of way, following electric transmission lines or along highways?

Electric power rights-of-way, depending on the voltage of the overhead lines, the cross-connections, and the height of the power lines (lowest point) can generate difficult underground voltages (corrosion and static voltages both) in pipelines that are parallel to the power lines.

Even if you “absolutely have to cross” the pipeline easement with the high voltage easement, you get construction problems, the galvanic corrosion and induced static charges, a nd the “parallel path” hills problem during construction.

Best to keep them separate. Or cross perpendicular to the other line.

18 posted on 01/25/2016 2:36:38 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Pipelines are built in HV Right-of-Ways.

Voltage mitigation is an expense, but not a major expense.


19 posted on 01/25/2016 3:07:57 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I call them fields of fire and ambush lanes but whatever.


20 posted on 01/25/2016 3:28:38 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson