Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/25/2016 10:15:38 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Seriously, why don’t we all just shelter in place because, you know, some critter somewhere could get injured. And, aren’t we all adding to the carbon footprint anyway by working, or living? So let’s just shut it all down — all of it.


2 posted on 01/25/2016 10:18:01 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney


3 posted on 01/25/2016 10:23:48 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I am so sick of tired of being tired of this crap. Environmentalists need to go to hell...an be done with it
Freegards
LEX


4 posted on 01/25/2016 10:24:22 AM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

No surprise there.

Must protect the salamanders and squirrels .. From any and all “assumed” and “projected” possible potential dangers.


5 posted on 01/25/2016 10:24:57 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

And this is why the Feds shouldn’t own these lands.


7 posted on 01/25/2016 10:34:18 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Why not use existing electrical transmission rights of way? There are already enough of those cutting through the forests and over mountains in WV and western VA.


8 posted on 01/25/2016 11:07:02 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I’d be willing to bet that many of these Forest Service employees enjoy heat from natural gas, in their homes and offices...and that travels through a pipeline.


13 posted on 01/25/2016 11:52:36 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Consequently, the pipeline project does not meet the agency's minimum requirements for a special use permit to cross the George Washington

Oh, what irony.

14 posted on 01/25/2016 12:34:39 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (I got nothin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Of course they do.

If we are blessed with a shillary or burnie loss these USFS people should be let go and the rest sent packing back to tending Smokey the Bear.


15 posted on 01/25/2016 1:20:55 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Ben Luckett, staff attorney at Appalachian Mountain Advocates, said the proposed 125-foot-wide construction right of way and 75-foot-wide permanent right of way for the pipeline would result in clear-cutting through the national forests, “causing dramatic forest fragmentation through some of the most high-quality forest habitat in our region.”

Bullspit. It creates habitat.


16 posted on 01/25/2016 1:21:45 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson