Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mikey_hates_everything

Why not using existing rights of way, following electric transmission lines or along highways?

We prefer to co-locate with existing rights of way where possible, but oftentimes it is not feasible. For example, electric transmission lines can traverse steep terrain in ways pipelines cannot. In addition, there often is not enough room along highway rights of way or there are other restrictions.

https://www.dom.com/library/domcom/pdfs/gas-transmission/atlantic-coast-pipeline/acp-faq-general.pdf?la=en


10 posted on 01/25/2016 11:13:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: thackney; mikey_hates_everything; SunkenCiv; NicknamedBob; SoothingDave
Why not using existing rights of way, following electric transmission lines or along highways?

Electric power rights-of-way, depending on the voltage of the overhead lines, the cross-connections, and the height of the power lines (lowest point) can generate difficult underground voltages (corrosion and static voltages both) in pipelines that are parallel to the power lines.

Even if you “absolutely have to cross” the pipeline easement with the high voltage easement, you get construction problems, the galvanic corrosion and induced static charges, a nd the “parallel path” hills problem during construction.

Best to keep them separate. Or cross perpendicular to the other line.

18 posted on 01/25/2016 2:36:38 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson