That’s fair enough.
I do have grave reservations though whenever scientists expound on things.
Look at what’s going on with Black Holes now. Some of them are saying there’s no such thing. They are reworking what the phenomenon is right now.
So I do listen and I find it all interesting, but I often keep it in reserve until the next morphing of accepted thought.
The idea behind black holes makes perfect sense. Because escape velocity increases proportionally to a body's mass. At some point escape velocity reaches and surpasses light speed.
But I get what you're saying. The history of science is littered with mistakes and revisions. Troubling thing is, it's not that way with so-called "man-made global warming". There, it's all "settled" with no room for debate.
Close. There are some physicists who dispute the nature of the event horizon of black holes.
But we do now know, for a fact that they do exist -while we can not see them, we do have images of their glowing accretion disks through telescopes, and we can infer the existence of others by the gravitation effect that they have on nearby visible bodies.