Posted on 01/12/2016 4:12:34 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Since the scores of New Year's Eve sexual attacks on German women by hundreds of men identified as Arab or North African, the left in Germany has faced a dilemma: which to fight for first -- women's human rights or multiculturalism?
This was the same dilemma that faced British authorities between 1997 and 2013. During those six years at least 1,400 girls from the age of 11 in just one English city (Rotherham, population 275,000) were raped by gangs of men, nearly all of whom were immigrants (mostly from Pakistan) or their sons.
But British authorities kept silent. Why?
In 2014, the reason finally was revealed: The perpetrators were Muslim, and British authorities were therefore afraid to publicize -- or often even investigate -- the crimes. They feared being branded Islamophobic and racist. Politicians on the left and right acknowledged this fact.
As I wrote in a column in 2014:
"In 2002, a Labor Party MP from nearby Keighley, Ann Cryer, complained to the police about 'young Asian lads' raping girls in her constituency. In her words, she 'was shunned by elements of her party.' And note, that as is demanded by the left in the UK, she didn't even mention that the rapists were Pakistani, lest Muslims be blamed for this evil. They were 'Asian lads.'"
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
The muslems were voting for the labor party. Labor wanted to stay in office. Therefor the welfare state party did nothing.
bttt
This was my comment on the RCP thread:
“The New Year’s Eve coordinated mass sexual assault committed by thousands of Muslim “rapefugees” across Europe was merely a warm up and a pep rally for the horrors about to unfold in 2016. Note carefully that while the German police were absent during the Muslim-against-German rape-fest on NYE, a week later they came out in force with water cannons and pepper spray hoses to break up a rally by Germans in defense of German women. This disgusting appeasement of the hostile “hijra” invaders will only be taken as a sign of abject surrender, and a green light for the Great European Jihad of 2016. Please read “Tet, Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive” to understand what is about to unfold.”
http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-take-two-islams-2016-european-offensive/
Right now, my money is on multiculturalism, but I hope they prove me wrong.
“All the isms of the left — multiculturalism, feminism, environmentalism, socialism, Marxism, egalitarianism — distort the individual’s and society’s moral compass.”
As I have repeatedly said, all of the “isms” are simply tools the left uses to break down the existing social structure and replace it with a Marxist one. The tool that “works best today” is given priority over the others which is why feminism must temporarily take a backseat to multiculturalism.
What happens when these Arabs start going after the most protected class, homosexuals? I will buy tickets to see how the liberals turn themselves inside out to handle that.
We temporarily delegate to governments some of the powers necessary to protect the people from all threats, foreign and domestic. When governments are unable or choose not to provide that protection, we have the natural right and the human duty to protect ourselves and others.
The citizens of Germany (and of the United States) have a moral obligation, if physically capable, to protect their children, brothers, sisters, wives, parents, friends, and neighbors from evil. If any government will not act to defend its citizens, then the people have a moral obligation to act as needed to stop the threat.
This was the same dilemma that faced British authorities between 1997 and 2013. During those six years............
*************************************************
Common Core math?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
