Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran removes core of Arak reactor
Arutz Sheva ^ | 12/1/16 | Ben Ariel

Posted on 01/11/2016 2:44:33 PM PST by Eleutheria5

Iran has removed the core of its heavy-water nuclear reactor in Arak and filled it with cement, the BBC reported on Monday, citing Iran’s semiofficial Fars news agency.

The fate of the reactor was one of the sticking points in nuclear negotiations between Iran and the six world powers, which reached a deal in July of last year.

Under the terms of the deal, Iran agreed the heavy-water reactor would be reconfigured so it was not capable of yielding material for a nuclear weapon.

Behrouz Kamalvandi, the spokesperson for Iran's atomic energy agency, told the Etemad newspaper on Monday Iran "has met its commitments under the July nuclear agreement earlier than expected".

"Implementation of JCPOA will finish in the next seven days," he said.

Satellite images from several years ago showed that the Arak plant was operational, raising fears that it is trying to produce plutonium for a nuclear bomb. Iran invited inspectors to visit the plant a year later, shortly after an interim agreement was signed with world powers.

Removing the core of the heavy water reactor to produce less plutonium is a crucial step...

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ankara; core; iran; iraniannukes; israel; lebanon; nukedeal; putingaveiranthebomb; russia; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Three simple questions

1. Where is the core now?

2. If this is all based on what Iran says, how can it be verified?

3. Has it been verified?

1 posted on 01/11/2016 2:44:33 PM PST by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

And we believe this WHY?


2 posted on 01/11/2016 2:46:19 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

What do you mean we, kimosavee? John Kerry believes this and is doubtless beside himself with joy.


3 posted on 01/11/2016 2:49:17 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I bet he wet himself.


4 posted on 01/11/2016 2:52:25 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Well, it was reported by Farce after all.


5 posted on 01/11/2016 2:56:33 PM PST by Darth Reardon (Is it any wonder I'm not the president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
IMO, it takes a long time to remove a reactor core, depending on size. There are long procedures to make safe to dismantle and remove after operating..

It seems to me that this procedure would have started some time ago, long before the Iran deal.

But then my nuclear engineering creds do not exist so maybe someone who has them can advise.

6 posted on 01/11/2016 2:56:47 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

The Iranian inspector has confirmed that the reactor has been deactivated. What further proof do you require?


7 posted on 01/11/2016 3:02:12 PM PST by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Where is the sarc tag?.....lol


8 posted on 01/11/2016 3:03:37 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

With No. 1 or No. 3?


9 posted on 01/11/2016 3:04:47 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Then they are making weapons grade material somewhere else.
This is just show, if it’s true to begin with.


10 posted on 01/11/2016 3:04:54 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

But did he say “honest injun?”


11 posted on 01/11/2016 3:05:36 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

What could possibly go wrong?


12 posted on 01/11/2016 3:08:10 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

John Hanoi Kerry believed that he was in Cambodia for Christmas.


13 posted on 01/11/2016 3:10:12 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

It reached a high enough level of plutonium, so they took it out to enrich it.


14 posted on 01/11/2016 3:11:21 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

I don’t think Plutonium needs enrichment. It is ipso fatso weapons grade.


15 posted on 01/11/2016 3:16:13 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

it’s da bomb...


16 posted on 01/11/2016 3:20:19 PM PST by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

That should be the first question posed to the traitor and SoS at his next news conference.


17 posted on 01/11/2016 3:25:59 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

“Under the terms of the deal, Iran agreed...”

Why do I have a hard time believing any of that crap?


18 posted on 01/11/2016 3:27:46 PM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

A portion of the uranium in a reactor core turns into plutonium. It has to be at a high enough level to make isolation practical. Also, about 25 lbs is needed to make a bomb.

I guess the Iranians calculated the reactor core had cooked enough plutonium to be usable.


19 posted on 01/11/2016 3:32:12 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Indeed, the fuel rods they removed contain the plutonium. Filling the containment vessel with concrete is a meaning less gesture. Where they removed the core to is the question.

Removing the core means they are in the final stages of bomb construction.


20 posted on 01/11/2016 4:24:14 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson