Three simple questions
1. Where is the core now?
2. If this is all based on what Iran says, how can it be verified?
3. Has it been verified?
To: Eleutheria5
2 posted on
01/11/2016 2:46:19 PM PST by
backwoods-engineer
(AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
To: Eleutheria5
IMO, it takes a long time to remove a reactor core, depending on size. There are long procedures to make safe to dismantle and remove after operating..
It seems to me that this procedure would have started some time ago, long before the Iran deal.
But then my nuclear engineering creds do not exist so maybe someone who has them can advise.
6 posted on
01/11/2016 2:56:47 PM PST by
Cold Heat
To: Eleutheria5
The Iranian inspector has confirmed that the reactor has been deactivated. What further proof do you require?
7 posted on
01/11/2016 3:02:12 PM PST by
TheDon
(BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
To: Eleutheria5
Then they are making weapons grade material somewhere else.
This is just show, if it’s true to begin with.
10 posted on
01/11/2016 3:04:54 PM PST by
Vinnie
To: Eleutheria5
What could possibly go wrong?
12 posted on
01/11/2016 3:08:10 PM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Eleutheria5
It reached a high enough level of plutonium, so they took it out to enrich it.
14 posted on
01/11/2016 3:11:21 PM PST by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: Eleutheria5
“Under the terms of the deal, Iran agreed...”
Why do I have a hard time believing any of that crap?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson